View Single Post
Old 04-24-09   #2266 (permalink)
clubhouse
*cough* Stock *cough*
 
clubhouse's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: London UK
Posts: 20

Rep: 2 clubhouse Unknown
Unique Rep: 2
Trader Rating: 0
Arrow Here you go...

Quote:
Originally Posted by clubhouse View Post
Anyway, I managed to hook up an old hard drive and I am right now running a new set of read/write tests with the RAID volume being unpartitioned. I will post them as soon as I am done with all RAID10 and RAID5
OK folks... after 24 hours of running tests, here are the results! Surprisingly, they are very different from what I ran before, as this time I used a separate hard drive to run HDTune from. The RAID volume was unpartitioned for each test, so I was also able to run write tests.

Not so surprisingly, RAID5 beats RAID10 indeed, as suggested by RobiNet previously. But now I am a bit confused... Should I really go with RAID5 and a strip size of 128k for a workstation that I will use for standard office work, running Vista x64? Any suggestions welcome...

EDIT: I attached all the results screenshots from HDTune, as well as a results.zip containing the Excel file with all tables and charts.

Please note that I was not able to run write tests at 32k block size, as HDTune was crashing

Comments welcome!



Attached Files
File Type: zip results_screenshots.zip (3.00 MB, 24 views)
File Type: zip results.zip (24.0 KB, 15 views)
__________________
My benchmarks for different RAID5 and RAID10 configs on my system: read | write

System: i7 Love Fest
CPU
Core i7 920
Motherboard
Asus P6T WS Pro
Memory
Corsair Dominator 6Gb DDR3-1600
Graphics Card
Asus EAH4350 fanless
Hard Drive
Perc5i + 4x300 Gb SAS Seagate Cheetah 15k.6
Power Supply
Silverstone NightJar ST45NF fanless
Case
LianLi PC-V2110B
OS
Vista Ultimate x64
Monitor
Dell S2309W

Last edited by clubhouse : 04-24-09 at 10:42 AM
clubhouse is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Page generated in 0.05278 seconds with 8 queries