Out of all the components/sub-systems that comprise the modern PC, the sound sub-system is the most difficult to review and evaluate.
Why do I think this? Unlike most other PC components or sub-systems, the performance of sound cards, headphones/headsets, and speakers sytems is not so much objective as it is subjective. After all, can headsets/headphones or speakers add frames per second (FPS) to a game? Some might claim that a sound card would indeed add to system performance because it takes on some calculations that the CPU would normally do, but whatever gains are made are so small they are rather insignificant. This is especially true today, the age of the poly-core CPU and mega-powerful GPUs.
It's true that there are metrics and measurements by which you can measure sound outputs. There are SNRs (signal-to-noise ratios), input/output bit-rate, number of output channels, number and type of inputs/outputs available, etc. At the end of the day, though, sound sub-system components are all about what your ears hear. Assuming that the reviewer has fully-functional ears, the review then becomes an attempt to describe what is likely a unique experience.
After all, how do you quantify a sensory experience? In a way, it's a bit like a piece of binary code: It's either a one or a zero. In terms of a sound card or speakers, it either produces sound output, or it doesn't. Obviously, though, there is much, much more going on than that.
How can you describe what sounds "good"? What is "great" sound? How much better is "good" compared to "very good" or "great"?
Moreover, what may sound good to one set of ears might very well be not so good to another.
Curiously, though, it's easier to have agreements as to what is "not good," or even "bad" sound. Sometimes, all you have to say is "It doesn't sound good." You often don't have to elaborate, as in "the high notes sound thin," or "the bass is muddy and muffled."
Good sound (and, by extension, great sound) is much harder to describe, especially when making comparisons. Moreover, positive evaluations of sound are always going to be colored by the individual value judgments of the reviewer.
Some reviewers prefer to have copious amounts of bass; others like excellent definition in sound, so that you can hear lows, mids, and highs clearly and precisely. Positional audio performance also counts for much for many reviewers. Some reviewers, for whatever reason, think that an audio component's visual appearance (!) should count for a lot.
With such a diverse and wide variety of criteria, it's no wonder why it's all too easy to just parrot the same recommendations over and over and over again ("Psst. Get the X-Fi thingamajig!", or "Don't get 5.1 headphones, man!"). The only true way to know which audio subcomponents are the best for you is to try it out for yourself.
Alas, there's the rub. It's all but impossible to go out and get (if only just to "test drive") all sorts of parts to see which combination will work best for your ears. Even for those with deep pockets, it's simply a black hole just waiting for any money to grab.
So to where does this discussion ultimately lead? I think that prospective buyers should definitely read as many reviews as possible. I would seek out positive as well as negative appraisals, for this is the only way to really have a complete picture of the product(s) you want to buy and use. If you have opportunities to try out various pieces of kit, never pass up those rare chances. Also, never be afraid to explore a different solution compared to everybody else; your requirements are unique, so your solutions should also therefore be unique. Finally, when you finally do get your audio components, BE HONEST WITH YOUR OWN SELF-APPRAISALS. This last bit is the most important thing to do.
You can't fool your own ears, after all.
Alphabetical Article List
Currently, there are 2161 Active Users (328 Members and 1833 Guests)
- › *Official* Intel DDR4 24/7 Memory Stability Thread 2 seconds ago
- › Forza Motorsport 7 Information & Discussion Thread 4 seconds ago
- › Skylake-X/Kaby Lake-X Combined Discussion 1 minute ago
- › [AMD Reddit/Videocardz]No AIB Vega cards before mid October 1 minute ago
- › [WCCFTech] Intel to launch 8C/16T Icelake CPU in H2 2018, feature... 2 minutes ago
- › [Various] 6C Coffee Lake Lineup: i7-8700K & i5-8600K / CPU-Z +... 3 minutes ago
- › X5460 overheating ?? 4 minutes ago
- › Project "Headless Linux CLI Multiple GPU Boinc Server" - Ubuntu... 5 minutes ago
- › Preliminary view of AMD VEGA Bios 6 minutes ago
- › Anything wrong with going i7 7700K for gaming 6 minutes ago
- › Corsair Obsidian 750D Computer Case With Side Panel Window by The_Rocker
- › Asus Xonar Essence STX 124 dB SNR / Headphone AMP Card by The_Rocker
- › Creative Sound Blaster Z Series ZXR (70SB151000000) Sound Card by The_Rocker
- › Intel Core i7-5820K Haswell-E 6-Core 3.3GHz LGA 2011-v3 140W... by foofer1233
- › Intel Core i7-3930K 3.2 1 LGA 2011 Processor - BX80619I73930K by powerhouse
- › HDPLEX H5 Fanless Computer Chassis by michelme67
- › Nuance Power PDF Standard by Lady Fitzgerald
- › ID-COOLING SE214L Snow Edition CPU Heatsink by DaveLT
- › Team Dark 16GB (2 x 8GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200)... by ADmodz
- › Logitech Wireless Keyboard K360 (Dark Silver) (920-003366) by enes13mes
- › Hands-On: TCL 55″ P-Series 4K HDR TV is...
- › (OPINION) AMD shot themselves in the foot by...
- › The Best CPUs of 1H 2017 (DRAFT)
- › AM4 Motherboard manufacturers , make...
- › AsRock, you dissapointed me on Ryzen launch...
- › Why 240GB, 250GB , 256GB, and 275GB SATA3 SSD...
- › The Orion Spectrum: Everything You Need from...
- › Windows 10 Tweaks
- › Analyzing the Source Code of UEFI for Intel...
- › Overclock.net Counter Strike: Global...