The question of stability in computers is a bit of a contentious point, I'd say. The best way I can express it is that it is an objective condition defined subjectively. In other words, there is such a thing as "true" or "absolute" stability, but because it seems to be a bit of an idealized condition, the best overclockers can shoot for is the closest possible approximation of this ideal.
In truth, I don't think absolute stability in computing is actually possible. There are simply too many variables, too many factors, which can compromise operational stability. There are a million billion individual pieces (i.e., transistors) trying to work in concert, and if just a few (or even one, if it's the critical one) craps out and causes a calculation mistake, the whole notion of stability falls apart.
However, even knowing this we as computer builders (I personally prefer the term "system integrator") still must strive towards creating as stable a machine as possible. Whether it's for our personal machine or for a client's, we must exercise the proper discipline and work hard towards assuring operational stability as much as possible.
This is especially true for overclocked machines. By definition, our overclocked computers have parts that are running at speeds beyond spec. While they may still be operating within the limits of safety, the faster we force these machines to go, the closer they get to these limits, and the smaller that margin of safety becomes. You get too close to the edge of stability, you definitely increase the risk of falling over to oblivion.
It's personally disturbing to see people with such flippant attitudes towards overclocking and achieving some modicum of stability. Why should I care so much about why they talk about not doing enough (if anything at all) to make their machines stable? Well, it's one thing to be a benchmark junkie; I can understand the idea that they simply want ultimate performance. They don't actually use their computers for anything remotely important. For most other people, though, even for people who just use their computers for gaming, stability is important. A crash is a crash, and system corruption is a headache for anyone who relies on his/her computer in any way.
The danger is that there are far too many people who don't care enough about overclocked stability, and that these people often are louder and more brash than more sensible folk. Let's just face it: It's hard WORK to make a machine stable. It's also a blow to one's ego (if you're inclined to think in these terms) to willingly slow your machine down just so it can be more stable than its actual top speed limit. Testing and tweaking is likely boring to most people. I can understand all these "negatives" to the imperative of achieving operational stability while overclocked.
Nevertheless, I personally cannot live with an unreliable machine. A reliable machine is one over which I have complete mastery; it will do what I want it to do. In contrast, an unreliable machine makes you do what you need to do. It's a role reversal I personally detest. I will never be any machine's slave. I will rely on the machine, and not the other way around, if I can possibly help it.
Thank you so much for reading. I appreciate your time and attention. As always, I invite comments and discussion.
Alphabetical Article List
Currently, there are 2227 Active Users (301 Members and 1926 Guests)
- › [Various] 6C Coffee Lake Lineup: i7-8700K & i5-8600K / 4.7GHz... 11 seconds ago
- › [Official] AMD R9 390/390X Owners Club 33 seconds ago
- › ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 ThreadRipper Overclocking / Support 1 minute ago
- › Asus Radeon 290X 3 minutes ago
- › [Official] Vega Frontier / RX Vega Owners Thread 3 minutes ago
- › Amd fx 8370 on wraith cooler HIGH temp. Is the wraith cooler a joke? 5 minutes ago
- › I need little help with my i5 7600k 6 minutes ago
- › GUIDE: Display control via Windows! Brightness, contrast, etc.... 6 minutes ago
- › [VC] Intel Core i9-7980XE 18-core early benchmarks 6 minutes ago
- › [Official] NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti Owner's Club 11 minutes ago
- › Phanteks PH-F140MP_BBK_PWM 140mm fan by AlphaC
- › Seasonic Flagship PRIME SERIES SSR-1200PD 1200W PLATINUM FULL... by mllrkllr88
- › Corsair Obsidian 750D Computer Case With Side Panel Window by The_Rocker
- › Asus Xonar Essence STX 124 dB SNR / Headphone AMP Card by The_Rocker
- › Creative Sound Blaster Z Series ZXR (70SB151000000) Sound Card by The_Rocker
- › Intel Core i7-5820K Haswell-E 6-Core 3.3GHz LGA 2011-v3 140W... by foofer1233
- › Intel Core i7-3930K 3.2 1 LGA 2011 Processor - BX80619I73930K by powerhouse
- › HDPLEX H5 Fanless Computer Chassis by michelme67
- › Nuance Power PDF Standard by Lady Fitzgerald
- › ID-COOLING SE214L Snow Edition CPU Heatsink by DaveLT
- › Hands-On: TCL 55″ P-Series 4K HDR TV is...
- › (OPINION) AMD shot themselves in the foot by...
- › The Best CPUs of 1H 2017 (DRAFT)
- › AM4 Motherboard manufacturers , make...
- › AsRock, you dissapointed me on Ryzen launch...
- › Why 240GB, 250GB , 256GB, and 275GB SATA3 SSD...
- › The Orion Spectrum: Everything You Need from...
- › Windows 10 Tweaks
- › Analyzing the Source Code of UEFI for Intel...
- › Overclock.net Counter Strike: Global...