My name is Joe, and I'd like to make a confession: I'm addicted to computer hardware testing.
There's just something undeniably exciting about the thought of going testing. Whether it's computer hardware or automobiles (I've tested various cars for Chrysler, Ford, GM, and BMW, among others), or even whilst playing my racing simulation games, there are few things I enjoy as purely as testing.
Why is it exciting? That's a deceptively simple question. It looks simple, but for me, it's deceiving because I've never come up with a correspondingly simple answer to it. What I do know for sure is that testing is partly driven by a thirst for knowledge and experience, as well as partly by a need to satisfy certain emotions. These are, I would think, universal human experiences, but they are nevertheless abstract.
Curiosity is a very strong motivator. Obviously, if you're testing something new, what you've got is essentially unknown. You're curious about what makes this piece of hardware tick. For an open mind, all kinds of possibilities are just simply exciting; you want to fill in that empty blank and take in a new experience for all that it's worth.
If I'm honest, though, I have to also admit that I experience a certain amount of skepticism (mistrust seems too strong a word, but only just) with some "professional" reviews. I don't know about you, but as far as I'm concerned, despite reading so many reviews on all sorts of computer parts (or cars, or whatever else), I personally could never shake a private nagging feeling that the review is somehow inadequate. Oftentimes the inadequacies are in the testing methodology: Either the reviewer doesn't know how to really quantify and describe the performance characteristics that truly matter, or he/she doesn't have access to proper testing equipment that can make accurate, correct measurements of the performance criteria. I've come across such appalling reviews of parts such as fans which basically amount to this: "Yes, this fan is capable of moving air, and it's pretty, too." There are no CFM or static pressure measurements, no dB (decibel) measurements, no RPM data, nothing remotely objective about that kind of review.
But I digress.
What else makes testing so fun? Newness is always exciting. It's like... well, think of how you feel at Christmas every time you open up a present. Who doesn't enjoy that particular thrill? Though I'm rapidly approaching my mid-thirties and have long ago experienced a redefinition of that kind of Christmas thrill (I get far more of a thrill at finding the perfect gift for someone I love, rather than receiving one), the excitement over testing a brand-new, unknown piece of hardware is a good replacement.
The quest for firsthand knowledge is exhilarating like few things are. In testing cars, it's always great to put a machine through a test course, and then tune into every aspect of it. You try to become "one with the machine," as some professional test drivers say. It's very much a physical experience, but in truth it's a mental experience as well. Your senses must interface with the machine, and your mind must be in direct communication at all times to be able to understand how the machine responds to your inputs (and therefore quantify and describe its performance characteristics). Moreover, the tester must have a good methodology to his testing in order to ensure his testing results are correct. (There are proper techniques to use when cornering a car on a twisty road course; hanging the tail out in power oversteer is emphatically NOT one of them.)
Computer hardware testing is similar, except that you are usually using fewer senses (you're not sitting on a computer and feeling G-Force, after all). But a focused and total engagement with the subject under testing requires the tester's full attention. This mental focus is a large part of the appeal, as well.
It's undeniable that testing is fun. There are many dimensions and reasons why it's fun.
But I think it should be said that there's more to testing than just indulging in "fun."
The thirst for knowledge is never frivolous...
Alphabetical Article List
Currently, there are 2567 Active Users (417 Members and 2150 Guests)
- › Astech just lost againt Cooler master for patent infringement on... 48 seconds ago
- › [TT] NVIDIA Tesla V100 tested: near unbelievable GPU power 1 minute ago
- › UPS Suggestions 2 minutes ago
- › [IGN] NES Classic Returning to Stores, SNES Classic Stock Increased 2 minutes ago
- › [Official] Heatkiller Club 3 minutes ago
- › Silent Air Cooled Build - 'Open' Case Labs BH8 vs 'Closed' Jonsbo W2? 3 minutes ago
- › [Vortez] Project "GOLD RUSH" Severely Damaged Following Computex... 4 minutes ago
- › [VC] Intel Core i9-7980XE 18-core early benchmarks 5 minutes ago
- › [List] Flat Cloth pads out of box 5 minutes ago
- › [Various] Citron Calls Ubiquiti Networks A 'Total Fraud' 6 minutes ago
- › Corsair Obsidian 750D Computer Case With Side Panel Window by The_Rocker
- › Asus Xonar Essence STX 124 dB SNR / Headphone AMP Card by The_Rocker
- › Creative Sound Blaster Z Series ZXR (70SB151000000) Sound Card by The_Rocker
- › Intel Core i7-5820K Haswell-E 6-Core 3.3GHz LGA 2011-v3 140W... by foofer1233
- › Intel Core i7-3930K 3.2 1 LGA 2011 Processor - BX80619I73930K by powerhouse
- › HDPLEX H5 Fanless Computer Chassis by michelme67
- › Nuance Power PDF Standard by Lady Fitzgerald
- › ID-COOLING SE214L Snow Edition CPU Heatsink by DaveLT
- › Team Dark 16GB (2 x 8GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200)... by ADmodz
- › Logitech Wireless Keyboard K360 (Dark Silver) (920-003366) by enes13mes
- › Hands-On: TCL 55″ P-Series 4K HDR TV is...
- › (OPINION) AMD shot themselves in the foot by...
- › The Best CPUs of 1H 2017 (DRAFT)
- › AM4 Motherboard manufacturers , make...
- › AsRock, you dissapointed me on Ryzen launch...
- › Why 240GB, 250GB , 256GB, and 275GB SATA3 SSD...
- › The Orion Spectrum: Everything You Need from...
- › Windows 10 Tweaks
- › Analyzing the Source Code of UEFI for Intel...
- › Overclock.net Counter Strike: Global...