At its very heart, Folding@Home (F@H) is a noble endeavor. Like too few of the best of human inventions, it is a community effort aimed towards accomplishing an altruistic goal. The aim: To use the project's ever-increasing amount of computing power to simulate protein synthesis, and therefore eventually wipe out certain diseases that afflict humankind, including sickle cell disease, cancer, Alzeihmer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and others.
I don't think anybody can dispute that this is a noble aim. What is better than to use our ever-improving technology to alleviate human suffering? To fold with this aim in mind defines the beauty of altruism; it is selfless, voluntary, loving service without any recompense or reward in any form.
Because F@H is, by definition, a distributed computing project, it is very easy to understand why PC enthusiasts support and participate in it with admirable enthusiasm. Many PC enthusiast communities support folding teams. OCN, in fact, is home to more than twenty teams all competing against each other, as well as against teams from other communities, to produce as many viable work units to contribute towards the whole project. There are also innumerable individuals not affiliated with any groups all contributing their otherwise unused computer cycles towards the common goal.
Evidently, then, F@H has acquired a kind of competitive aspect to it, albeit one which is, in essence, a very good one. Competition, after all, is one of those things which inspires people to improve; the competitive instinct motivates people to do better than they otherwise might and achieve more.
Despite understanding this, I must confess feeling a sense of unease when I consider these points. If I'm honest, I would admit that I feel that, in some ways, the altruistic aspect inherent in folding has been somewhat compromised and corrupted by introducing the element of competition in the endeavor. Why?
Judging by many of the comments I come across, it appears to me that the primary interests for participating in F@H are 1) to show off a killer, multi-core rig OCed to the gills, and 2) to boast about how many WUs said folding rigs can now produce.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought F@H had nothing to do with PC enthusiast e-peen waving and comparison. I thought F@H was all about donating your computer's spare unused cycles so that it can join myriad others in an effort to simulate protein synthesis and hopefully find ways to prevent and cure diseases..?
I think that somewhere along the way, the noble goals of F@H got subverted, submerged, and perverted. The reason for participating in the project became much more about one's folding rig and much less about the reasons for donating your computer's spare CPU cycles to an altruistic cause. It's as if folding became the territory of someone who needed to brag, instead of that of someone with absolutely no need for glory or thanks or acknowledgment.
By no means am I alleging that this is a universal ill to which F@H has succumbed. Thankfully, the situation I'm describing and criticizing likely describes just a small minority of participants who totally miss the point of the project. Hardcore PC performance enthusiasts, after all, constitute a very small segment of the market, no matter what they might personally want to believe. And I'm not saying that it's just hardcore PC performance enthusiasts who perhaps have become blind to the real reasons for F@H.
Perhaps all this ranting is pointless anyway; as long as people do contribute to F@H and other similar altruistic distributed computing projects, humanity takes more steps closer towards accomplishing the real goals of the project.
In other words, as long as things get done... It's only me who maybe gets annoyed at some inappropriate rationales behind participation, and I'm just a lone voice.
Alphabetical Article List
Currently, there are 2226 Active Users (409 Members and 1817 Guests)
- › [Build Log] Zen, the Ying Yang Build, couple questions as well! 44 seconds ago
- › How to change my monitor saturation. 1 minute ago
- › [Official] Nvidia GTX 980 Ti Owners Club 1 minute ago
- › How To Game on Windows 10? 1 minute ago
- › Phanteks Enthoo Primo air-cooled build with mainly used / on sale... 2 minutes ago
- › [cnet] Android Oreo is here. You can expect it on your device soon 2 minutes ago
- › WattTool: A simple tool that combines overclocking with VRM... 2 minutes ago
- › Hawaii Bios Editing ( 290 / 290X / 295X2 / 390 / 390X ) 3 minutes ago
- › August 2017 Foldathon: Monday 21st - Wednesday 23rd - 1200 ET/1600 UTC 6 minutes ago
- › My experience with the Asus PRIME X370-Pro 7 minutes ago
- › Intel Core i7-3930K 3.2 1 LGA 2011 Processor - BX80619I73930K by powerhouse
- › HDPLEX H5 Fanless Computer Chassis by michelme67
- › Nuance Power PDF Standard by Lady Fitzgerald
- › ID-COOLING SE214L Snow Edition CPU Heatsink by DaveLT
- › Team Dark 16GB (2 x 8GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 2400 (PC4 19200)... by ADmodz
- › Logitech Wireless Keyboard K360 (Dark Silver) (920-003366) by enes13mes
- › PDF Studio 12 - Advanced PDF Editor for Windows - Pro Edition... by Lady Fitzgerald
- › Brand New Fujitsu ScanSnap ix500 Portable Document Scanner... by Lady Fitzgerald
- › Tecware Phantom Backlit Mechanical Keyboard (Red / White Backlit... by DaveLT
- › Allsop XL Mouse Pad- Raindrop Blue by neilyo
- › (OPINION) AMD shot themselves in the foot by...
- › The Best CPUs of 1H 2017 (DRAFT)
- › AM4 Motherboard manufacturers , make...
- › AsRock, you dissapointed me on Ryzen launch...
- › Why 240GB, 250GB , 256GB, and 275GB SATA3 SSD...
- › The Orion Spectrum: Everything You Need from...
- › Windows 10 Tweaks
- › Analyzing the Source Code of UEFI for Intel...
- › Overclock.net Counter Strike: Global...
- › DIY: How to do a fiber optic mechanical...