|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
! YOU SON OF A GLITCH !
![]() |
I found this and thought you people here with Opteron Single and Dual core alike would find this interesting. This is not all of my own work so I cannot take full credit for this thread. The sources mentioned below deserve much credit. I felt one location of useful information would be beneficial. The Following article contains information on the AMD Opteron 939 series Please also take a moment to visit The Official Order of the Opteron I now also Have an AM2+ thread for AM2 CPU submissions please visit Official Socket AM2/AM2+ Opteron Most Overclockable Stepping Averages + Info When submitting CPU OC info please include the following when possible 1.CPU Used 2.CPU Stepping 3.V-core in use at current Overclock 4.Current Overclocked speed Now Lets tell you exactly what the Letters and numbers mean in a Stepping Code: What do the letters mean? For Example CCBBE CCBBE 1st letter: "production/release code" Pre-production or early samples have an "A" here where final production batches will be a "C" (for current chips). Some may recall that Venice samples where seen in the wild as "ABBLE" and current production runs are "LBBLE". While complete understanding of this is unknown at this time, it is clear that this has something to do with early samples. CCBBE 2nd letter: "core cache code" A = single core, 1MB B = single core, 512KB C = dual core, 1MB (each) D = dual core, 512MB (each) Note: 'Toledo' cores (1MB) with half the cache disabled will still be coded as "C". Therefore, you can see earlie 4600+ samples as ACXXX with only 512KB per core enabled. CCBBE 3rd and 4th letters/numbers: "memory controller revision" Works like a counter using all letter of the alphabet and digits 1-9. 3rd letter increments when running though all available 'steppings' as noted by the 4th letter. CCBBE 5th letter: "revision code" C = rev C (as in CG Clawhammers) D = rev D (as in D0 for CBBID chips....) E = rev E (as in the rev E 'San Diego' core) -FCG & s7e9h3n 0530, 0534, 0550, 0551, 0606, 0607, 0608, 1610 etc. etc. etc. Simple, the first 2 numbers (0610) are the year the CPU was made the second 2 numbers (0610) are the week of that year that the CPU was produced (hence the highest it could ever be is 52) MPMW, UPMW, VPMW, DPMW etc. etc. These are some kind of packing code, it is beleived that the first letter (DPMW) has to do with the day the CPU was made, the details are still unknown. Info Thanks to ''euphoricmix'' What Stepping Is Your Hammer? Quote:
More info here : http://www.overclockers.com/tips00466/ Revision Guide for AMD AthlonTM 64 and AMD OpteronTM Processors Quote:
Whole document here : http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/25759.pdf Single Core Socket 939 Opterons 90NM : Opteron 100-series "Venus" (standard-power, 90 nm) *All models support: MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64 (AMD's x86-64 implementation) *All models support up to Unbuffered PC3200 DDR SDRAM *All models only support singleprocessor configurations ![]() Opteron 100 Series Overclocking Stepping average Info ( Single Core ) CABNE 0539: and before were great overclockers ~3.0ghz+ CABNE 0540: and after haven't been that great but still not bad ~2.8ghz CABYE 0539: and before not to bad ~2.8ghz CABYE 0540: and after great oc'ers ~3.0ghz+ CABGE: All weeks not the greatest 2.6-2.7 at high voltage CAB2E: All weeks are hitting about 3.0ghz+ except the 0546 FPDW, which has never been seen above 2.8ghz, even at 1.6v. CACJE: from 2006 have also been doing pretty well, 2.9ghz+ on relatively low voltage and air cooling. CAB1E 0614: and anything else that happens to come out, 2.9+ stock/low voltage. Dual Core Socket 939 Opterons 90NM: Opteron 100-series "Denmark" (90 nm) *All models support: MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64 (AMD's x86-64 implementation) *All models support up to Unbuffered PC3200 DDR SDRAM *All models only support singleprocessor configurations ![]() Opteron 100 Series Overclocking average Stepping Info **Warning Take Note** CCBWE: are less likely to be coldbugged. CCBBE and CCB1E: are very likely to be coldbugged. Only such issues would arrise in the event of using Extreme cooling solutions such as Phase. Averaging >=2800 CCB1E 0550VPMW CCB1E 0605XPMW CCB1E 0608MPMW CCB1E 0609FPMW/FPAW CCBBE 0610DPMW (most consistent for 3GHz +) CCBBE 0617FPMW CCBWE 0602BPMW CCBBE 0615DPMW/EPMW Averaging 2600-2800 CCB1E 0606FPMW CCB1E 0609FPBW CCBWE 0530TPMW CCBWE 0546XPMW/MPMW CCBWE 0550UPMW/VPMW LCB9E 0646RPMW (Rebadged X2 stepping for the last batch of 939s, seem decent with voltage) Averaging <=2600 CCBWE 0534SPMW CCBWE 0541RPMW CCBWE 0543TPMW CCBWE 0551UMPW/VPMW CCBWE 0604TPMW CCBWE 0607UPBW CCBWE 0609FPAW KNOWN steppings to AVOID if you want at least 2.9ghz: CCBWE 0607_____(Any processor of that week) CCBWE 0602_____(Any processor of that week) CCBWE 0551_____(Any processor of that week) CCBWE 0546MPMW CCBWE 0543TPMW CCBWE 0534SPMW Overclock.Net Member successful Opteron 100 Series Overclocks 1.Mudd: Opteron 165 CCBBE0616XPMW @ 3.0GHZ 2.tubnotub1 : Opteron 165 CCBBE0617FPMW @ 3.0GHZ 3.boredom: Opteron 148 Cabye 0543 @ 3.0GHZ 4.TheSubtleKnife: Opteron 144 CAB2E 0546UPMW @ 3.0GHZ 5.Norz: Opteron 146 CACJE @ 3.0GHZ 6.3XTR3M3: Opteron 170 CCBWE 0530TPMW @3.065GHZ 7.BrinNutz: Opteron 165 CCBBE 0610 @ 3.0GHZ 8.TheWaxShop : Opteron 170 CCBWE 0551 UPMW @ 3.015GHZ Opteron 148 CABYE 0542 FPMW @ 3.504GHZ 9.dotcomthese: Opteron 165 ccbbe 0617 @ 3.0GHZ 10.Kaxx: Opteron 165 CCBBE 0610DPMW @ 3.0GHZ 11.NuclearCrap: Opteron 165 CCBBE 0617FPMW @ 3.0 GHZ 12.MjrTom: Opteron 165 CCBBE 0615DPMW Prime stable at 3.0GHz with 1.55v Superpi 32M stable at 3.1GHz with 1.55v 13. Ira-k: Opteron 150 CACJE 0603GPBW @ 3162 GHZ 14. noneed4me2 : Opteron 170 LCB9E 0652 WPMW @ 2.8 GHZ+ 15. YeaBaby : Opteron 170 LCBQE @ 2.8 GHZ 16.vwgti : Opteron 170 LCB9E 0651RPMW @ 3.0GHZ 1.35v Quote:
I had to Quote this ! The Opteron 185 Dual core has been left out as i cant find the best stepping average for this CPU at current. If people have New steppings to add for the Opteron 100 series both for Single and Dual core then send me a PM and ill add it with your average or maximum overclock and put your Username by it. Hope this helps. Source:http://wiki.extremeoverclocking.com/wiki/Opteron Source:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...22_.2890_nm.29 Source:http://forums.extremeoverclocking.co...d.php?t=246130 Source:http://uk.gamespot.com/pages/unions/...d=2812&print=1 Source:http://icrontic.com/articles/amd_socket_am2_review Source:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...icroprocessors Visit my other thread like this just for AMD Opteron 939 Series Socket AM2/AM2+ Most Overclockable Stepping Averages + Info
__________________
Quote:
Fold For The Cause ! Fold For The People . Hoping to be back in Folding action soon
![]()
Last edited by ENTERPRISE : 01-12-08 at 06:31 AM. Reason: Updates and added Info ! |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
|
A brief explanation:
__________________1st letter= production release C is for current 2nd letter= A = single core, 1MB; B = single core, 512KB; C = dual core, 1MB (each); D = dual core, 512MB (each) 3rd & 4th letter= memory control revision such as; FX-55: XXA2X FX-57: XXBNX FX-57 (new stepping)/FX-60: XXB2X 3700+ (new stepping): XXB3X Opteron 165/170:XXBWX, XXB1X, XXBBX 5th letter= is the revision code, like the E is refering to the San Diego Core For a more detailed explanation read through this: What do the letters mean? CCBWE/CCB1E/CCBBE Quote: Originally Posted by freecableguy @ xtremesystems Example: CCBWE CCBBE 1st letter: "production/release code" Pre-production or early samples have an "A" here where final production batches will be a "C" (for current chips). Some may recall that Venice samples where seen in the wild as "ABBLE" and current production runs are "LBBLE". While complete understanding of this is unknown at this time, it is clear that this has something to do with early samples. CCBBE 2nd letter: "core cache code" A = single core, 1MB B = single core, 512KB C = dual core, 1MB (each) D = dual core, 512MB (each) Note: 'Toledo' cores (1MB) with half the cache disabled will still be coded as "C". Therefore, you can see earlie 4600+ samples as ACXXX with only 512KB per core enabled. CCBBE 3rd and 4th letters/numbers: "memory controller revision" Works like a counter using all letter of the alphabet and digits 1-9. 3rd letter increments when running though all available 'steppings' as noted by the 4th letter. FX-55: XXA2X FX-57: XXBNX FX-57 (new stepping)/FX-60: XXB2X 3700+ (new stepping): XXB3X Opteron 165/170:XXBWX, XXB1X, XXBBX ... and so on... CCBBE 5th letter: "revision code" C = rev C (as in CG Clawhammers) D = rev D (as in D0 for CBBID chips....) E = rev E (as in the rev E 'San Diego' core) -FCG & s7e9h3n 0530, 0534, 0550, 0551, 0606, 0607, 0608, 1610 etc. etc. etc. Simple, the first 2 numbers (0610) are the year the CPU was made the second 2 numbers (0610) are the week of that year that the CPU was produced (hence the highest it could ever be is 52) MPMW, UPMW, VPMW, DPMW etc. etc. These are some kind of packing code, it is beleived that the first letter (DPMW) has to do with the day the CPU was made, the details are still unknown. ----------------------------------* ----------------------------------* ----- Opteron 165: CCB1E 0550VPMW CCB1E 0606VPMW CCB1E 0608MPMW CCBBE 0610DPMW Opteron 170: CCBWE 0550UPMW <- this one is the exception to the rule, this stepping actually has quite a few total duds that can't exceed 2.7ghz. Still, I myself have owned one that did 3ghz. CCB1E 0550VPMW CCB1E 0609FPAW Honorable Mention: CCBWE 0530TPMW -> most of them cant quite hit 3ghz, more like 2.9-2.95. CCBWE 0546XPMW -> OK stepping, 2.85-2.9ghz average CCBWE 0609FPAW -> Do not confuse with the CCB1E 0609FPAW, which is a better CPU. This CCBWE version seems to be a 2.9ghz average. KNOWN steppings to AVOID if you want at least 2.9ghz: CCBWE 0607_____(Any processor of that week) CCBWE 0551_____(Any processor of that week) CCBWE 0546MPMW CCBWE 0543TPMW CCBWE 0534SPMW
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Habitual Tinkerer
|
I've been having good luck with my 150, I can hit it with a 12X, 11X and 10X..I'll try 9X next..I really need to get a Lanparty board for it, if I can hit 3100 with it on this mobo I probably will...It's burning in pretty good, I'm having to use less V-Core and have been able to tighten the timings some...
150-CACJE 0603GPBW BN-E4 Revision EDIT: These are my newest OC's....I think I'm topped out now with it on this mobo and ram...Not that I'm complaining they have done very well for what they are it amazes me they have kept up this well...You got to love Micron.... ...CPU-Z Validator 3242mhz CPU-Z Validated 3242mhz ...http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=205813 CPU-Z Validated 3197mhz ...http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=205810 CPU-Z Validated 3181mhz
__________________
Stinger V-8p 437W TEC Block..WMD 20RZ...480 GTX Rad... Part-1-480 GTX-Temps W & W/O Shrouds...Crydom/Switech Relay Wiring Athlon LE 1600 @ 3500mhz*10...5000BE @ 3510*10...150 Opty @ 3242 mhz*12
Last edited by ira-k : 10-23-07 at 11:55 PM. |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
nVidia Enthusiast
|
who knows something about this stepping:
LCB9E 0636APMW it's from an opty 165
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
what voltage and cooling are you using?
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
ATI Enthusiast
|
I am hitting 2.8+ on my LCB9E 0652 WPMW, its at 1.4v right now orthos stable 8+ hours http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=191042 . Mootfox and The Duke are also getting good clocks out of there LCB9Es. I think their at least better than most CCBWEs.
__________________Edit: LCB9E 0652 WPMW http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=193096 at 1.4v. Idle is 36c load is 52c for 1hour in Orthos. The LCB9E are turning out real good, even at lower voltage.
Last edited by noneed4me2 : 05-03-07 at 06:19 AM. |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Great thread.. well the person mine from said this cpu does 2.7 on stock volts.
__________________Yesterday I tried 1 of the saved CMOS and it was 2950mhz hehe but I dont want to try using the pc a lot because i have bad HSF not even the opty 165 stock one =\ so I'm here looking for a new HSF
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
! YOU SON OF A GLITCH !
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Fold For The Cause ! Fold For The People . Hoping to be back in Folding action soon
![]()
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|