|
|
|
#31 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
![]()
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 2,480
Rep: 171
![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 143
Trader Rating: 10
|
Quote:
You gotta do your own testing on your board.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
AMD Overclocker
![]() |
Quote:
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | ||||||||
|
You break it, I fix it.
![]() |
Quote:
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
AMD Overclocker
![]() |
Here is my Everest Cache and memory bench. It seems Ganged mode increases memory read significantly.
Unganged Ganged
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
My Raison D'Etre
![]()
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Stoke on Trent - UK
Posts: 1,728
Rep: 284
![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 217
Trader Rating: 0
|
Its not a case of the options switching you from Dual to Single channel at all.
Its is an option that affects how the memory is addressed by the CPU. When running ganged mode your memory controller will operate in 128-bit mode. This has the benefit of giving the whole CPU a massive memory bandwidth. When handling one application that greatly benefits from higher memory performance this is the option you want to be sticking with. Unganged basically will split that 128-bit memory bus into 2 x 64-bit, so you will essentially have two memory buses. Because of this, Unganged is particularly useful If you are a heavy multitasker, as you are packing 2 memory controllers effectively. It will not force single or dual channel setups. Your memory will always be dual channel regardless of which configuration you choose. It is simply a case of how you wish your system to be tuned. If you are using your PC for a live audio take, handling multiple tracks, then ganged will benefit you with the higher memory bandwidth. If you are wanting to do some encoding of some movies while you have a quick blast on CS:S, however, go with unganged, as then one half of the memory controller will be dedicated to each running app.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
AMD Overclocker
![]() |
Hey guys, I've been really sick the past few weeks, otherwise I would've responded sooner. I did do testing and got no where with it. I tried both settings and didn't notice any difference in speed. There were slight differences in the speed that basic office programs opened, but nothing major. So, I believe that OrphanShadow is right, it doesn't matter what setting you choose, dual-channel mode is always enabled.
__________________
3DMark06 = 14714 Performance Test 6.1 (x64) = 1386.4 ATI Red Tide!! "When in doubt, overclock!! If that doesn't work, overclock some more!! If all else fails throw it out the window and be done with it!!" - Anon.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
AMD Overclocker
|
Quote:
will be testing with ganged mode tonight as all 4 banks are identically filled.
__________________
AMD X2 OVERCLOCKER {s. 2004 : previous build=Athlon X2 4600 @ 2.9Ghz, 4Gb DDR470 A8N32SLi Deluxe, TX750W, Vista Ult. 64}
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Angry Linux Gamer
![]() |
Ganged mode is faster for single apps. However, these are quad cores dammit; you multitask on them
. Unganged offers the best performance overall.
__________________
CPU-Z Validation GPU-Z Validation FGLRX look out thread Linux ATI driver installation ATI Overclocking in Linux ATI open source driver installation
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
xp 32 bit will only see less than 4gb but with 64 bit there arn't such limitations
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
sorry wrong thread
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|