|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > AMD > AMD Memory | |
need help running my ram at 1066
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
AMD Overclocker
![]()
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 702
Rep: 56
![]() Unique Rep: 53
Trader Rating: 0
|
i have this RAM, http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820231166
from what i heard this is a nice pair of sticks, i put them into my new built and by default it was set to 800 so i changed that to 1066 and let vista install itself, i come back a while later and see a BSOD, so changed it back to 800 and installed windows after it installed without problems i changed it back to 1066, put the timings at 5-5-5-15 and voltage at 2.1 i turned on orthos and did a mem test, failed after 2 seconds ![]() i set it back to 800 and orthos ran for a while without errors, how can i get it to run at 1066 stable??
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
![]()
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Woburn, MA - Soxnation
Posts: 837
Rep: 68
![]() Unique Rep: 60
Trader Rating: 1
|
You're in the tested range for voltage, doesn't sound like you did anything wrong.
Try backing off the voltage a bit and raise your 15 to 18 and see if that helps. if that works, then lower it to 15 again and say waddup! Try 2.05, 2.0 - beyond that you can start wondering if they might be garbage.. But... that ram does seem very Intel chipset based - and you're rocking ATI/AMD but have NVidia card....sometimes those things do matter if they designed that particular ram for Intel boards
__________________
2 TB's are Explosive!! Album of the Watercool build Run this album as a slideshow to see the plane explode from Left for dead while I was playing 1900 by 1200
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
![]()
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Woburn, MA - Soxnation
Posts: 837
Rep: 68
![]() Unique Rep: 60
Trader Rating: 1
|
What I'm saying is, depending where you are OC -wise - I found mine finnicky at 1066. Loaded at 8 GB's now at 800 it's fine....
I think the 1066 was garbage from the beginning considering it could never go more than 1 channel?? What? or the AM3 boards only running 1 of DDR3? Screw that - I want all the same...
__________________
2 TB's are Explosive!! Album of the Watercool build Run this album as a slideshow to see the plane explode from Left for dead while I was playing 1900 by 1200
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
AMD Overclocker
![]()
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 702
Rep: 56
![]() Unique Rep: 53
Trader Rating: 0
|
i think im just gonna leave them at 800, i doubt i would even notice the difference anyways
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
AMD Overclocker
![]() |
Quote:
Intel is the other way around. For that reason, for DDR2 on AMD systems I will always buy 800 and get a set with really tight timings (4-4-4-12). and Gill, check out the thread I just bumped
Last edited by Cavi : 09-04-09 at 11:29 AM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|