|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > AMD > AMD Memory | |
Can someone explain to me RAM latency and Frequency?
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||
|
Overclocker
![]() |
Well, basically I want to know what is the correlation between ram latency and ram frequency. Why is it you get lower latency with lower frequency (and vice versa). And for that matter, what is latency?
Thanks guys!
__________________
FOR SALE: AMD 3700+ San Diego 2.2ghz AND Patriot 2X512mb DDR PC3200 Ram and FM Modulator FOR SALE: Durabrand Portable 8.5" DVD Player Quote:
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
![]() |
the latency is basically the time it takes to communicate between a command u give the computer until it actually retrieves the information to do so. less timing equals faster ram and the frequency is the cycles per second so to speak of the ram. usually, the higher the frequency or rpm;s if u will the faster the information is retrieved.
__________________cache is important too. itll save up certain information in the cache so when u request that information it has it right then and there instead of cycling thru to get it. im sure theres a more in depth thread on Overclock.net here somewhere. good luck on ur quest for knowledge
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Seems that we are on AMD forum , i will add i heard AMD CPU use better low latency than high frequency
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||||||||||
|
Overclocker
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
FOR SALE: AMD 3700+ San Diego 2.2ghz AND Patriot 2X512mb DDR PC3200 Ram and FM Modulator FOR SALE: Durabrand Portable 8.5" DVD Player Quote:
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
![]() |
yea just remember tho general rule of thumb is higher frequency lower the timings, even tho that does not neccessarily mean go for the higest frequency as its important to have a good equal balance in my opinion
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
![]() |
it usually holds tru for the most part excpet when u jummp from say ddr1 ram, to ddr2, or ddr3. then it fluctuates a wee bit more. also take into account the voltage. i was told anyways the more important one is the cas latency and the timings are kind of a ball parkish figure, altho not sure how true
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Programmer
|
it is necessary increase vdimm if we play tight timing?
__________________what is means by 4-4-4-12 (the bold ones)
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
![]() |
A good rule of thumb is that every ONE decrease of CL timings is roughly equal to a frequency increase of 125MHz. I read a very good article on this subject on Tomshardware once (tables and everything) but I am unable to locate it now. The article I am writing about was testing with DDR2 RAM but I put his figures to the test with my DDR3 RAM and they seem pretty accurate still.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|