ELmo1989

Thank you very much I would enjoy that very much!!!

__________________
We Will Find A Way To Win Or Will Make A Way To Win.
,Xbox 360 modder

daffy.duck

I'm sorry but I just don't have the time at this moment but here's a post by Phil_Boggild that might interest you: http://www.overclock.net/6874421-post33.html

Mastiffman

Underthegun,

PCIe 1.0 x 2 is not only x8. On the Asus A8N32 Sli deluxe, one card ran at x16 and two cards in Sli also Ran in x16 instead getting bumped down to x8 like most of the otherboards would only allow. It was one of, if not the only 939 board that supported a full x16 in Sli...

But one card going from 1.0 to 2.0 won't make much difference, if any at all. The card can only produce so much bandwidth. x16 can handle WAY more bandwidth than most single card setups can produce. The real difference would be going from Dual cards in Sli at full x16 1.0 to Dual cards in Sli 2.0 or Xfire.

Open1Your1Eyes0

The GTX295 and the HD4870X2 are the only two cards that actually barely pass the bandwidth of PCI-express x16 1.0. For every other card below them it won't even be an issue so no worries.

__________________

firestormcomputers

Wrong, the 4890 and GTX 285 have also been known to exhibit a small decrease in performance when running in PCI-E 1.0 x16 and PCI-E 2.0 x8.

__________________

Open1Your1Eyes0

I have yet to see that be an issue for anyone. Care to backup your claim?

EDIT: Just noticed that your statement doesn't actually make any sense, PCI-E 1.0 x16 = PCI-e 2.0 x8. Therefore, even if there's any variation in performance, the bus bandwidth is not what's contributing to the change.

__________________

UndertheGun

Point is does not matter for 99% if you know it does hey why are you on this thread? It does not matter! If your got 3 or 4 cards running you better not be asking questions.

Mastiffman

HUH? on the first part.....

Who is on this thread that you're asking about.

I don't think that anyone mentioned that they had three or four cards..... lol