Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > ATI > ATI Drivers and Overclocking Software

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-28-06   #1 (permalink)
*cough* Stock *cough*
 
thiru's Avatar
 
amd ati

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Paris
Posts: 1,087

Rep: 40 thiru is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 36
Trader Rating: 0
Default Can't OC memory clock much on a 9600...

Hey overclockers.
I have a ATI Radeon 9600Pro with 256MB RAM with stock speeds of 400 for the core and 250 for the memory (=400/250, right?).
Well I used ATITool to overclock it a maximum of 565/252. I'm wondering why I can overclock the core by 40%, but can't get better than a 0.08% gain on the memory... Could it be the manufacturer, maybe the quality of the RAM (I got some unknown thing called Triplex Parasouls)?

And should I touch the AGP bus speed (that 66MHz thing in the BIOS) or the AGP voltage?
__________________
System: Tadaim
CPU
Phenom II X3 720 BE
Motherboard
Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Memory
2x2GB OCZ Gold PC3-10666
Graphics Card
Sapphire HD5770 V2
Hard Drive
Samsung F3 1TB
Sound Card
VIA Onboard
Power Supply
OCZ StealthXstream 600W
Case
Cooler Master Elite 334
OS
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
Monitor
AOC F22+ Full HD
thiru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-06   #2 (permalink)
Windows Wrangler
 
laboitenoire's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: MA/Worcester & OH/CWRU
Posts: 3,079

Rep: 207 laboitenoire is acknowledged by manylaboitenoire is acknowledged by manylaboitenoire is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 173
FAQs Submitted: 7
Hardware Reviews: 1
Trader Rating: 0
Default

I'm not an ATI user, but I can answer your other questions. You should never touch the AGP speed or voltage. While doing so *might* give you slightly better performance, running any motherboard component out of spec (like AGP and PCI buses) can cause hell on your system.
__________________
My user name too long or weird for you? Feel free to call me LBN. FYI, it's French for "the black box."
Zune Owner's Club! | Audio Stuff: Zune HD 16, Etymotic ER-6, Audio Technica ATH-M50
Official OCN Camera Thread | Camera Stuff: Fujifilm S700, Tiffen filters
Planned Upgrades: Nikon DSLR (D50 or D70), Some sort of lens...
There's really nothing remarkable about it. All you do is hit the right notes at the right time and the instrument plays itself. - J.S. Bach

System: The Black... Slice? (Latitude E6500)
CPU
Core 2 T9550
Memory
4.00 GB OCZ
Graphics Card
Quadro NVS-160M
Hard Drive
250 GB 7200 rpm
OS
Windows 7 Professional x64
Monitor
15.4" 1440*900
laboitenoire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-06   #3 (permalink)
4.0 GHz
 
guitar22891's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 988

Rep: 46 guitar22891 is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 38
FAQs Submitted: 4
Trader Rating: 0
Default

I don't own ati either but try to leave the core on stock and see how much you can take the memory from there. If it doesn't go any higher then I guess your best bet is what you have right now. Heat might also be a problem with your card... don't let it get to hot...
__________________
System: My System
CPU
3.0E E0 Presscott @ 3.85
Motherboard
P4P800 SE
Memory
1GB DDR500 Gskill HZ
Graphics Card
FX5500 256mb 128bit AGP
Hard Drive
200GB Sata1.5 Maxtor
Sound Card
Onboard
Power Supply
400w FSP-PN
Case
Xoxide 5 in 1 combo
OS
Windows XP Home & Ubuntu
Monitor
19in Flat Panel
guitar22891 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-06   #4 (permalink)
Overclocker
 
xie67's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: bRISBane
Posts: 2,870

Rep: 309 xie67 is a proven memberxie67 is a proven memberxie67 is a proven memberxie67 is a proven member
Unique Rep: 205
FAQs Submitted: 2
Trader Rating: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thiru
Hey overclockers.
I have a ATI Radeon 9600Pro with 256MB RAM with stock speeds of 400 for the core and 250 for the memory (=400/250, right?).
Well I used ATITool to overclock it a maximum of 565/252. I'm wondering why I can overclock the core by 40%, but can't get better than a 0.08% gain on the memory... Could it be the manufacturer, maybe the quality of the RAM (I got some unknown thing called Triplex Parasouls)?

And should I touch the AGP bus speed (that 66MHz thing in the BIOS) or the AGP voltage?
And the fact that the memory IC's are only DDR.

May I suggest to drop the core down below stock and manually bring the memory clock up by 2-5MHz each time and run an artifact scan to check on the stability.
When you start to get artifacts and reset's on the time counter for errors back it off about 10% of the gain and run Aquamark3 benchmark to load it up if it passes re run the artifact scan and check it again.
You need to heat the GPU and memory up a fair bit to get a real indication of it's overclock stability.
__________________
System: My System
CPU
3700+Sandiego KACAE
Motherboard
DFI LP UT nF4 SLI-D
Memory
2x512Mb TCCD
Graphics Card
2 x eVGA6600GT 256Mb
Hard Drive
WD 80Gb SATAII
Sound Card
Audigy
Power Supply
Enermax Noisetaker 485W
Case
XG Quantum - modified
OS
XP Puss Pro
xie67 is offline xie67's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-06   #5 (permalink)
*cough* Stock *cough*
 
thiru's Avatar
 
amd ati

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Paris
Posts: 1,087

Rep: 40 thiru is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 36
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xie67
And the fact that the memory IC's are only DDR.
May I suggest to drop the core down below stock and manually bring the memory clock up by 2-5MHz each time and run an artifact scan to check on the stability.
When you start to get artifacts and reset's on the time counter for errors back it off about 10% of the gain and run Aquamark3 benchmark to load it up if it passes re run the artifact scan and check it again.
You need to heat the GPU and memory up a fair bit to get a real indication of it's overclock stability.
I don't see the advantages of underclocking the core to overclock the memory (surely it can't be better than 565/252?).
DDR memory on GPUs is like DDR memory on PCs? If so, then maybe it isn't so surprising it only overclocks to around 250 (so it'd be DDR500 that doesn't overclock well or something that's already overclocked).
I don't know if you've ever used ATITool, but it does all that automatically...My max overclock 565/252 is stable (tested for 6 hours with it). But I haven't tried it on any new games (waiting to get Oblivion...my GPU will suffer ).
__________________
System: Tadaim
CPU
Phenom II X3 720 BE
Motherboard
Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Memory
2x2GB OCZ Gold PC3-10666
Graphics Card
Sapphire HD5770 V2
Hard Drive
Samsung F3 1TB
Sound Card
VIA Onboard
Power Supply
OCZ StealthXstream 600W
Case
Cooler Master Elite 334
OS
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
Monitor
AOC F22+ Full HD
thiru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-06   #6 (permalink)
Overclocker
 
xie67's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: bRISBane
Posts: 2,870

Rep: 309 xie67 is a proven memberxie67 is a proven memberxie67 is a proven memberxie67 is a proven member
Unique Rep: 205
FAQs Submitted: 2
Trader Rating: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thiru
I don't see the advantages of underclocking the core to overclock the memory (surely it can't be better than 565/252?).
DDR memory on GPUs is like DDR memory on PCs? If so, then maybe it isn't so surprising it only overclocks to around 250 (so it'd be DDR500 that doesn't overclock well or something that's already overclocked).
I don't know if you've ever used ATITool, but it does all that automatically...My max overclock 565/252 is stable (tested for 6 hours with it). But I haven't tried it on any new games (waiting to get Oblivion...my GPU will suffer ).
Okay you have DDR DDR2 and DDR3 on the graphics cards the later being the better.
The point of dropping your core clock is to see what the maximum memory clock you can obtain. Obviously you will raise your core clock once you have determined your max memory clock.
Yes I am fully aware of the operation of ATITOOL! I find that by manually raising and lowering the clocks by the method I described affords me a better result.

As you state you are only gainning 2MHz on the memory clock the above was a method in which to verify if you are reaching max memory clocks.

furthermore I am thinking that you have hit find max core and then find max memory.....This is not the best solution, the fastest automated way is not always the best.
__________________
System: My System
CPU
3700+Sandiego KACAE
Motherboard
DFI LP UT nF4 SLI-D
Memory
2x512Mb TCCD
Graphics Card
2 x eVGA6600GT 256Mb
Hard Drive
WD 80Gb SATAII
Sound Card
Audigy
Power Supply
Enermax Noisetaker 485W
Case
XG Quantum - modified
OS
XP Puss Pro
xie67 is offline xie67's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-06   #7 (permalink)
*cough* Stock *cough*
 
thiru's Avatar
 
amd ati

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Paris
Posts: 1,087

Rep: 40 thiru is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 36
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Yes, I did use the find max X button. But I dont see how manually setting the clocks would yield better results. It'd just be less stable clocks that weren't fully tested (since the 'auto' finds some artifacts).
__________________
System: Tadaim
CPU
Phenom II X3 720 BE
Motherboard
Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Memory
2x2GB OCZ Gold PC3-10666
Graphics Card
Sapphire HD5770 V2
Hard Drive
Samsung F3 1TB
Sound Card
VIA Onboard
Power Supply
OCZ StealthXstream 600W
Case
Cooler Master Elite 334
OS
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
Monitor
AOC F22+ Full HD
thiru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-06   #8 (permalink)
*cough* Stock *cough*
 
thiru's Avatar
 
amd ati

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Paris
Posts: 1,087

Rep: 40 thiru is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 36
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by laboitenoire
I'm not an ATI user, but I can answer your other questions. You should never touch the AGP speed or voltage. While doing so *might* give you slightly better performance, running any motherboard component out of spec (like AGP and PCI buses) can cause hell on your system.
I knew there was a reason nobody mentioned those in their guides....
__________________
System: Tadaim
CPU
Phenom II X3 720 BE
Motherboard
Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Memory
2x2GB OCZ Gold PC3-10666
Graphics Card
Sapphire HD5770 V2
Hard Drive
Samsung F3 1TB
Sound Card
VIA Onboard
Power Supply
OCZ StealthXstream 600W
Case
Cooler Master Elite 334
OS
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
Monitor
AOC F22+ Full HD
thiru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-06   #9 (permalink)
4.0ghz
 
0rion's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,816

Rep: 268 0rion is a proven member0rion is a proven member0rion is a proven member
Unique Rep: 222
Trader Rating: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by laboitenoire
I'm not an ATI user, but I can answer your other questions. You should never touch the AGP speed or voltage. While doing so *might* give you slightly better performance, running any motherboard component out of spec (like AGP and PCI buses) can cause hell on your system.
I dont know about this advice, I own an x800xt pe, and I DO adjust those things. I usually adjust the bus to 67mhz, and I upped the voltage for the card to 1.7v. I had an overclock once or twice that the standard 1.5v didnt cut it. If the voltages were left alone, the system would crash when playing games or using the gfx hard. The AGP speed of 8x however, I agree should never be touched. But as for pci bus speed and gfx speed, I would recommend it if you are getting crashes to desktop when gaming.
__________________
System: Quad Rig
CPU
Q9650 E0 4.11ghz 1.3v
Motherboard
Asus P5k-Deluxe/Wifi
Memory
2x 2GB G.skill DDR2-1000
Graphics Card
HIS HD 2900 XT 512MB
Hard Drive
2x 160gb Velociraptor Raid 0
Sound Card
Creative X-FI Fatal1ty FPS
Power Supply
Corsair 750TX
Case
CoolerMaster Stacker 810
CPU cooling
D-Tek Fuzion
GPU cooling
EK FCR600
OS
Windows Vista Ultimate X64
Monitor
2x 22" ACER X223WBD
0rion is offline Overclocked Account 0rion's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-06   #10 (permalink)
Overclocker
 
xie67's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: bRISBane
Posts: 2,870

Rep: 309 xie67 is a proven memberxie67 is a proven memberxie67 is a proven memberxie67 is a proven member
Unique Rep: 205
FAQs Submitted: 2
Trader Rating: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thiru
Yes, I did use the find max X button. But I dont see how manually setting the clocks would yield better results. It'd just be less stable clocks that weren't fully tested (since the 'auto' finds some artifacts).
Well I guess you have got it all sorted..please disregard any advice from my experiences then.!
__________________
System: My System
CPU
3700+Sandiego KACAE
Motherboard
DFI LP UT nF4 SLI-D
Memory
2x512Mb TCCD
Graphics Card
2 x eVGA6600GT 256Mb
Hard Drive
WD 80Gb SATAII
Sound Card
Audigy
Power Supply
Enermax Noisetaker 485W
Case
XG Quantum - modified
OS
XP Puss Pro
xie67 is offline xie67's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 PM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2010 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.17741 seconds with 8 queries