Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > ATI

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-21-07   #101 (permalink)
Overclocker
 
SpaceCat's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DiGiTaL-MaDnEssEs
Posts: 406

Rep: 16 SpaceCat Unknown
Unique Rep: 14
Trader Rating: 0
Default

850mhz/1266mhz i run scan for artifact for atleast 9minutes(artifact free)
855mhz/1266mhz i run scan for artifact for about 5 minutes(artifact free) then it crashes
__________________
No rest for the Wicked

Lossless collection

System: Floor It
CPU
q6700 3,6Ghz 1,51v
Motherboard
Maximus Formula
Memory
OCZ ATI Edition 6400
Graphics Card
Giabyte 4870
Hard Drive
Samung 4x1TB, 500GB, Seagate 500GB
Sound Card
ASUS Xonar D2X/XDT
Power Supply
Mist 600 Watt
Case
my floor
CPU cooling
Water
GPU cooling
Water
OS
w7 Ultimate
Monitor
Samsung SyncMaster 215tw
SpaceCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-07   #102 (permalink)
WaterCooler
 
intel ati

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 183

Rep: 20 huniper is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 19
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Does anyone have any water cooled clocks yet with this new bios?
__________________
System: Silvy
CPU
Lapped Qx9650 4.05ghz
Motherboard
Asus Blitz Extreme (P35)
Memory
2x1GB Supertallent DDR3 1600
Graphics Card
Saphire 4870X2 + Saphire 4870 1GB Tri-Fire
Hard Drive
2x Velociraptor-Raid 0
Sound Card
Supreme FX2
Power Supply
Silverstone Strider 1200w
Case
Silverstone TJ09
CPU cooling
DTek Fuzion,MCP655,MCRES MICRO,Thermochil PA220
GPU cooling
DD Waterblocks, Koolance Exos 2
OS
Vista Ultimate
Monitor
Samsung 2493HM 24" 1920x1200
huniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-21-07   #103 (permalink)
Overclocker
 
SpaceCat's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DiGiTaL-MaDnEssEs
Posts: 406

Rep: 16 SpaceCat Unknown
Unique Rep: 14
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by huniper View Post
Does anyone have any water cooled clocks yet with this new bios?
yes i doo but heat isnt the issue on theese cards
yet
__________________
No rest for the Wicked

Lossless collection

System: Floor It
CPU
q6700 3,6Ghz 1,51v
Motherboard
Maximus Formula
Memory
OCZ ATI Edition 6400
Graphics Card
Giabyte 4870
Hard Drive
Samung 4x1TB, 500GB, Seagate 500GB
Sound Card
ASUS Xonar D2X/XDT
Power Supply
Mist 600 Watt
Case
my floor
CPU cooling
Water
GPU cooling
Water
OS
w7 Ultimate
Monitor
Samsung SyncMaster 215tw
SpaceCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-07   #104 (permalink)
PC Gamer
 
bad_haze's Avatar
 
amd ati

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,003

Rep: 72 bad_haze is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 66
Trader Rating: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 003 View Post
Convincing people in advance is hard. On the 20th, it won't be.

Every single review of the HD3870 that includes the 2900 for testing used the cat 7.10 drivers on the 2900 and the beta 7.11 cats on the 3870.

The 3870 is quite literally, a die shrink of the R600 including UVD+ and an inferior 256-bit memory controller and 512-bit internal ring bus. What it does have though, is a higher core clock speed than the XT (775 vs 743) and a higher memory clock, but in the end (with regards to memory alone) the memory bandwidth is what matters and in the case of the 3870, a 256-bit memory bus with higher clocked memory is not enough to keep up with the 512-bit memory and 1024-bit internal ring bus on the 2900Pro/XT.

The memory bandwidth on a stock HD3870 is 72GB/s. The memory bandwidth on a stock XT is 105GB/s. The memory bandwidth on my 2900Pro with the memory @ 1035MHz is 125GB/s. The canadian website that overclocked the 3870 to 860MHz core and 2.7xGHz mem did not post a screenshot of GPU-Z. Even if they did I seriously doubt the bandwidth would have increased so drastically that it would surpass 125GB/s. The 256-bit memory bus and 512-bit internal ring bus are what kills the memory on the 3870. If ATI had used 512-bit gddr4 memory with a 1024-bit internal ring bus, the 2900 series would not have stood a chance against the 3870 and nvidia would be sweating a lot more than they are now. Unfortunately, they didn't.

Also it is important to know that the 2900Pro and the 2900XT are exactly the same card, they just have different bios'. The pro has tighter timings on the memory and when at the same core speed as the XT, it will beat the XT even with lower memory clocks, and this is consistantly the case. This is why it is better to use a volt modded pro bios rather than the volt modded XT bios, even when the XT bios will technically allow for higher memory clocks.

Moving on to the core.... it's pretty much the same as the R600, except a die shrink and the addition of UVD+ support. It also seems that right now, the 3870 refuses to budge an inch over 860mhz, which is very bad because a volt modded pro will easily hit 880MHz without breaking a sweat, possibly 900MHz or over, and that would be without question if you're on water cooling. I am on very good air and I know there are at least two people on XS to get 900 and 920mhz with volt mods on good air (and afaik, few others have tried, and the ones that have did not volt mod).

Hope this satisfies you...
Sorry bro, the 2900pro despite its larger bandwidth, will not beat a 3870. The 3870 has much newer technology, better features, and a more efficient design than the 2900 series.
http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards....=536&card2=547
http://www.overclock.net/ati/261915-...an-8800gt.html
__________________
We are all different electrons travelling through the same motherboard

The Star Trek Club

System: Golden Copper
CPU
AMD PII X4 940 BE (235x15; 3.52 Ghz; 1.40v; 45c)
Motherboard
ASUS M3A78-CM
Memory
Kingston 4G Dual Channel DDRII 800 Mhz (2x2G)
Graphics Card
Sapphire HD 4850 (730/1115; 1.2v BIOS Mod; 32c)
Hard Drive
Seagate 2x (RAID0) 7200.10 500G
Sound Card
Onboard HD Audio 5.1
Power Supply
FSP 550w (38a @ 12v)
Case
Antec 300
CPU cooling
Zalman Scythe Ninja (Cu)
GPU cooling
Zalman Vf1000 (Cu)
OS
Windows Vista Ultimate (x64)
Monitor
LG 22" W2242TQ (8000:1)
bad_haze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-07   #105 (permalink)
003
nVidia Enthusiast
 
003's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,703

Rep: 246 003 is acknowledged by many003 is acknowledged by many003 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 184
Trader Rating: 6
Default

Lol dude, first of all I already know a stock 2900pro will be raped by the 3870, as the pro is a heavily underclocked XT (though it has tighter memory timings than the XT). Knock up the core and memory speed, and you are looking at a very, very different comparison.
Here is a better comparison:


This is my current highest stable overclock on my 2900Pro, on air. I am saving up for some good water cooling currently.

Specifically take note of the fill rates, clock speeds and memory bandwidth

Oh, and pixel fill rate can be calculated by # of ROPs * core clock, and texture fill rate can be calculated by # of TMUs * core clock. The number of TMUs and ROPs on the 2900pro/xt and 3870 are all 16.

Memory bandwidth can be calculated by the size of the memory bus * the memory clock speed.
__________________
System: Core i7: Round 2
CPU
Core i7 920
Motherboard
Asus Rampage II Gene
Memory
6x2GB Mushkin 998729
Graphics Card
BFG GTX280 OCX
Hard Drive
2x WD RE3 1TB RAID 0
Sound Card
Auzentech X-Fi Forte
Power Supply
Corsair VX550
Case
HEC 6T10B
CPU cooling
Xigmatek HDT-S963
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 RTM
Monitor
NEC LCD2490WUXi
003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-07   #106 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 203

Rep: 12 QuickSkillz Unknown
Unique Rep: 8
Trader Rating: 0
Default

TBH I could care less about what gpuz says, lets see some real world benchmarking. You were the same guy that said on the 21st you were going to show everyone how much the 2900 series will improve with the 7.11 drivers, lets see the results .
__________________
System: My Current Rig
CPU
Opteron 170 @ 2.81 on stock volts
Motherboard
ASUS A8N5X
Memory
2GB kingston DDR333
Graphics Card
XFX 8800GTS 512MB
Hard Drive
WD 250GB 16MB SATA
Sound Card
Audigy 2zs
Power Supply
Sparkle 550W
Case
CM 690
CPU cooling
Stock
OS
Windows XP Pro SP3
Monitor
P275 CRT
QuickSkillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-07   #107 (permalink)
003
nVidia Enthusiast
 
003's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,703

Rep: 246 003 is acknowledged by many003 is acknowledged by many003 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 184
Trader Rating: 6
Default

Actually I said the volt modded bios would improve it. And it is not working on my card. When I flash it, I get no video and I have to boot blind off a floppy and flash back to the original bios. It sucks because there are two people on XS with the exact same video card as me, same brand, model and everything, and it works fine for them. I am very PO'd about this, it looks like I will have to wait for the next version of ATITool to reliably change voltages. I posted GPU-Z because bad_haze did the same thing by posting a link to gpureview.

Want to see some 3dmark scores? Check out the last two or so pages of the "2900 Pro owners thread" on xtremesystems.
__________________
System: Core i7: Round 2
CPU
Core i7 920
Motherboard
Asus Rampage II Gene
Memory
6x2GB Mushkin 998729
Graphics Card
BFG GTX280 OCX
Hard Drive
2x WD RE3 1TB RAID 0
Sound Card
Auzentech X-Fi Forte
Power Supply
Corsair VX550
Case
HEC 6T10B
CPU cooling
Xigmatek HDT-S963
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 RTM
Monitor
NEC LCD2490WUXi
003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-07   #108 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
rx7speed's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: caldwell, Idaho
Posts: 3,387

Rep: 166 rx7speed is acknowledged by manyrx7speed is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 125
Trader Rating: 2
Default

for the timings with the xt/pro do you have any proof that they are different or just speculation?

with the drivers between 7.11 vs 7.10 I have yet to notice much if any difference performance wise between them.

are we even sure though that the 3870 is going to be memory limited to where that 256bit bus is going to hurt it compared to the 512mb bus. I'm almost thinking that the memory performance isn't hurting either of these cards that much as ati put the reference clock at only 800mhz for I think both the 22900 and the 3800 series even more so when they know the ram can go much further then that.
__________________
System: compy jr
CPU
xeon 3350 at 3.6ghz
Motherboard
Asus P5k-dlx
Memory
2x2gb a-data
Graphics Card
diamond 3870 @ 945/1296 stock cooling
Hard Drive
4xseagate st3250410as 330mb/s avg read
Sound Card
x-fi xtreme gamer dumbtl1ty
Power Supply
OCZ Gamerextreme 700w
Case
upgraded metal box
CPU cooling
tuniq tower 120
GPU cooling
stock
OS
vista ultimate x64/xp sp3
Monitor
compaq 21" junk
rx7speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-07   #109 (permalink)
New to Overclock.net
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 203

Rep: 12 QuickSkillz Unknown
Unique Rep: 8
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Nah thats ok, I could care less about 3dmark06 just because it is rigged. I wanted to see some real world fps results.
__________________
System: My Current Rig
CPU
Opteron 170 @ 2.81 on stock volts
Motherboard
ASUS A8N5X
Memory
2GB kingston DDR333
Graphics Card
XFX 8800GTS 512MB
Hard Drive
WD 250GB 16MB SATA
Sound Card
Audigy 2zs
Power Supply
Sparkle 550W
Case
CM 690
CPU cooling
Stock
OS
Windows XP Pro SP3
Monitor
P275 CRT
QuickSkillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-07   #110 (permalink)
003
nVidia Enthusiast
 
003's Avatar
 
intel nvidia

Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,703

Rep: 246 003 is acknowledged by many003 is acknowledged by many003 is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 184
Trader Rating: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by QuickSkillz View Post
Nah thats ok, I could care less about 3dmark06 just because it is rigged. I wanted to see some real world fps results.
Ok whatever I'm done here. 3dmark06 is not reliable for comparing ati vs. nvidia in some cases but if you're saying it's rigged when the 2900 is put against the 3870, ok dude....
__________________
System: Core i7: Round 2
CPU
Core i7 920
Motherboard
Asus Rampage II Gene
Memory
6x2GB Mushkin 998729
Graphics Card
BFG GTX280 OCX
Hard Drive
2x WD RE3 1TB RAID 0
Sound Card
Auzentech X-Fi Forte
Power Supply
Corsair VX550
Case
HEC 6T10B
CPU cooling
Xigmatek HDT-S963
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate x64 RTM
Monitor
NEC LCD2490WUXi
003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 AM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.17584 seconds with 8 queries