|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
I say go with the X2, easy call. Same price and the X2 is better. You can also go CF with another X2 later when the price drops and a game actually demands it.
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
~Gamer~
![]() |
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Guilt is like a bag of bricks ... all you got to do is let it down. What about love? Overrated...biochemically no different than eating large quantities of chocolate. Quote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
IMO, going 2x 4870 leaves you with a much more difficult upgrade in the future. 4870 X2 and leave yourself room to easily upgrade. Easy, no?
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
![]() |
On Newegg, you can get a really cool-looking 4870 1GB version for about $240 - 2 of of those are cheaper than 1 4870X2.
On the other hand, you won't be able to upgrade later wihout taking a card out, and you'll need to spend more on a board with multiple PCI-E x16/8 buses (busses?) and a Crossfire supporting chipset (If you plan on staying Intel, that is. If you decide to go AMD, finding a Crossfire board at a good price isn't too hard).
__________________
FECES
Now that I've gotten your attention, please read my post properly if you haven't done so. 1600FSB Stable on TP35D2-A7 CPU-Z Valid These links are helpful, too: Why Linux is not (yet) ready for the desktop The OCN Professionalism Initiative Why YOU should use proper English.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Ghost in the machine
![]() |
You do know that you can crossfire a 4870 and a 4870X2 as well?
__________________And yes when ATI gets off its butt and enables sideport through its drivers (the 8.12's were rumoured to be able to do that), the X2 will be a better option. I expect they will save the enabling for competing against the Nvidia GTX295
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
"... Introduce a little anarchy, you upset the established order, and everything becomes chaos. I am an agent of chaos. And you know the thing about chaos ? It’s fair." "The world changed after August 8 this year."
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Ghost in the machine
![]() |
Quote:
and here is the diamond 4870X2 for $440 ![]() so no they are not cheaper.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
*cough* Stock *cough*
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Edmonton, Canadaland
Posts: 405
Rep: 11
![]() Unique Rep: 11
Trader Rating: 0
|
Quote:
. and besides, the x58 supports crossfire. i might as well go with the 4870x2, but i dunno, 2 4870s would look kinda cool in a window and all .EDIT: those are american prices, i'm canadian. thanks anyways robilar!
__________________
Quote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
![]() |
The performance is very similar between the two from what I've seen. Apparently the x2 is supposed to run faster because of a couple things, one of which being a feature which they call a "sideport". http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Sapphire/HD_4870_X2/
Though for some reason or another this "sideport" is disabled in 4870x2 cards. Like it's there, integrated into the chips, but disabled by the drivers. Whether it would really add any extra performance or not is somewhat unknown, or at least it was last I heard about it. And apparently it will be enabled in a future driver, but again, it's completely unknown whether or not it will actually increase performance, and even if it does by how much? So basically, what I'm saying is it's not really a reason to buy the 4870x2 rather than two 4870s, there's just not enough known about it. I just thought it would be worth bringing up. From what I've read they perform nearly the same as each other, the 4870x2 and crossfire 4870s.There are a few reviews up that compare the two, such as these: ~ http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...rd-review.html ~ http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon...ew-crossfire/1 ~ http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/S...4870_X2/1.html ~ http://hothardware.com/Articles/ATI-...On-Top/?page=1 There are probably more too. I haven't really looked much into which of these reviews are the most realistic, but I guess you can look at the ones on the sites you trust most. Seems like either way you'll be fine. Both are great options
__________________
PSN: Deathsnapper ; xbox GT and wii FC: Too lazy to make them. ![]() Q6600 @ 3.6ghz; stable. Q6600 @ 3.825ghz; NOT stable. ![]() 3.2GHz, very stable at stock voltage! (1.2125 in bios, 1.18 in windows)
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|