|
|
|
 |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > ATI | |
The 2x4830 vs 2x4850 vs 48701gb vs 4890 Thread
|
||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
02-23-09
|
#1 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
 
|
The 2x4830 vs 2x4850 vs 48701gb vs 4890 Thread
The 2x4830 vs 2x4850 vs 48701gb vs 48901gb Thread Full Results Pending Systems will use:
Tests done by:
2x 4830 3DMARK06 http://www.overclock.net/attachment....9&d=1235616040 VANTAGE http://www.overclock.net/attachment....1&d=1235871007 Crysis http://www.overclock.net/attachment....4&d=1236365268 Furmark http://www.overclock.net/attachment....0&d=1236026867 GTA4 Results Pending Far Cry 2 Results Pending 2x 4850 3DMARK06 http://i40.tinypic.com/xfu6wp.jpg VANTAGE http://www.overclock.net/attachment....2&d=1235592695 Crysis http://www.overclock.net/attachment....0&d=1235591567 Furmark http://www.overclock.net/attachment....1&d=1235627286 GTA4 http://www.overclock.net/attachment....3&d=1235680361 Far Cry 2 http://www.overclock.net/attachment....7&d=1236032778 4870 1gb 3DMARK06 http://www.overclock.net/attachment....7&d=1235457854 VANTAGE http://www.overclock.net/attachments...0-3.6ghz-v.jpg Crysis http://www.overclock.net/attachments...z-4870-1gb.jpg Furmark http://www.overclock.net/attachment....8&d=1235656625 GTA4 http://www.overclock.net/attachment....8&d=1235598215 Far Cry 2 Results Pending 48901GB 3DMARK06 http://www.overclock.net/attachments...0-950-1100.jpg VANTAGE http://www.overclock.net/attachment....5&d=1240439068 Crysis Results Pending Furmark Results Pending GTA4 Results Pending Far Cry 2 Results Pending This thread is related to http://www.overclock.net/ati/465032-...ossfire-2.html I made this to make it cleaner and easier to display the results when we have them. !Conclusion! MORE SP'S (stream processors) = win! pew pew  J/k... we will have one soon. This is more about price/performance as well as the issues that you will inherit from whatever setup you choose. One thing that you need to be aware of if you choose to do any multi gpu setup and compare it to a powerful single card is that your min fps will end up lower then the single cards sometimes but higher in the max fps. This is why when you look at reviews do NOT only look at max fps or even Average fps. You should be concerned with the MIN. Take a look at the furmark tests for example. 2x4830 max: 50 2x4850 max: 52 4870 max: 48. The 2x4830 wins in max fps against the 4870, but in min fps it has 14 and the 4870 has 25 for min. With the solid OC that the 4830 can do, the min fps could be raised up though. The 2x4850's only beat the 4870 in min fps by 2 fps compared to the 4870 beating the 2x4830's by 11 in min fps. The 4890 (new to this thread) beats out 4850 cf at stock by 2 fps in max, and 2 for min. See if it happens in some other benchmarks/games. ---------------------------------------- Other people benching who don't match our systems: happyxix 4830 cf: http://www.overclock.net/5666019-post40.html Asmola 4830 cf OVERCLOCKED: http://img440.imageshack.us/ifs/4255/img42/1/06uusi.jpg blossa 4830 CF reaches 28k in 3dmark06: http://www.overclock.net/6312915-post664.html ---------------------------------------- DIG IT!: http://digg.com/hardware/2X_4830_VS_...1GB_Comparison Thanks, Drizzt5
__________________
My old 24/7 settings in 3dmark06 - 20,305  The 2x4830 vs 2x4850 vs 4870 1gb vs 4890 thread!Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Drizzt5 : 07-02-09 at 03:58 PM |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
02-23-09
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
 
|
The tests wont be 100% accurate because off different systems (only identical CPU's dont cut it) but close enough for me, i cant wait for the results.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
02-23-09
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
*cough* Stock *cough*
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Saint John, NB
Posts: 2,913
Rep: 135
 Unique Rep: 127
Trader Rating: 15
|
i have a 6700 @ 3.6 and have a vantage key. if i have the game(if you are branching out) i would be glad give benchmarks
__________________
Yeah.....i still play WC3 TFT, so what....
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
02-23-09
|
#4 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
|
Q6700 is the same except for the higher multiplier right?
We have fairly identical systems. I will be doing a fresh reformat for mine, I don't know if the others will do it for theres. We all have 4 gb of ddr2 ram. we all have asus boards. It's pretty close.... And my water cooling won't give me an advantage since I'm keeping my cpu at 3.6ghz for the test.
__________________
My old 24/7 settings in 3dmark06 - 20,305 The 2x4830 vs 2x4850 vs 4870 1gb vs 4890 thread!Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
02-23-09
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
~Gamer~
 
|
What what the Quad be running? 450*8 or 400*9. Also we should keep same ram timing. I can do 400Mhz 4-4-4-12 or 450Mhz 5-5-5-15.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
02-23-09
|
#6 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
i read this a few weeks ago:
__________________http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...e_2.html#sect0 hopefully your results will verify this... cant really beat the bang/buck in this setup!
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
02-23-09
|
#7 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
|
Quote:
533 5-5-5-15  ?edit: btw, i think 3.6ghz is the best since that is what I commonly see people get out of there q6600. It would help people decide on a card/cards better.
__________________
My old 24/7 settings in 3dmark06 - 20,305 The 2x4830 vs 2x4850 vs 4870 1gb vs 4890 thread!Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Drizzt5 : 02-23-09 at 11:22 PM |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
02-23-09
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
02-23-09
|
#9 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
~Gamer~
|
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
02-23-09
|
#10 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
|
Ok, btw any chance that you will be reformatting soon :P ?
__________________
My old 24/7 settings in 3dmark06 - 20,305 The 2x4830 vs 2x4850 vs 4870 1gb vs 4890 thread!Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
