Crysis Benchmark Results Thread

[kkbob33]

You know, i had dualie Nvidia cards before and they pulled better frames in this benchmark than dualie 4870s .

With that being said, A single 4870 has better performance in all other games i play than the Nvidia cards i owned before. That's part of the reason i sold my second 4870

That proves to me that the game is totally Nvidia biased. I've said it before and I'll say it again, this benchmark is only good to compare Nvidia vs. Nvidia cards.


EDIT: I owned both 2 9600GT and 2 8800GT.

[smileyguy]

I am having some issues here. I only managed a max of 61.xx FPS with my Q6600 at 3.6 and card clocks at 690/1183. Q6600 @ 3.6

I don't think this bench likes the 200 series cards.

[arkheii]

Sig rig, E8400 at stock with SpeedStep, 9600GT @ 775/1950/1080

Very minor difference between DX9 and DX10 on high...

[smileyguy]

Better.

[smileyguy]

Originally Posted by Litlratt

cpu and cards at stock

Could you run that again on DX 10 4AA same res please?

[NrGx]

Bit disappointed. Anyone have any ideas? The funny thing is that when actually playing I run it at High settings with 1680x1050 and get 25-30 FPS.

[Tricky]

DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 70.82

DX9 1680x1050 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 59.9

DX9 1680x1050 AA=4x, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 47.145

DX10 ones coming when I get back from vacation

[smileyguy]

We need to update that front list. With a max FPS of 123, there is alot of potential left.

[Chickenman]

Damn it - couldn't quite get 70fps avg on dx9, ended up overclocking a bit at a time to get to the last result, not that much more left in the 280. Kept cpu at 3.6ghz for comparisons sake.

[Ce1eron]

X2 4000+ @ 2.246 -- cheapo mobo
9600GSO 600/1700/1800

Was hoping it would be over 30fps, but every time I tried only the 3rd run managed over 30. :/