Crysis Benchmark Results Thread

[lordikon]

To download the benchmark tool, google for Crysis 1.05 Benchmark Tool. I'll look into getting this uploaded to the downloads section.

Setup Type #1: DX9, 1280x1024, No AA, Game Quality: High.
Setup Type #2: DX10, 1280x1024, No AA, Game Quality: High.

Screenshot of the benchmark is required, CPU-Z and GPU-Z benchmark screenies optional, but would be nice. Scores are limited to the Top 25 in the each category.. Also, to make this easier for me to maintain, you must list your stats in this format (along with your screenshots), here is an example:

45.50 fps -- lordikon -- e8400 @ 3.8 -- 2x 8800GTSs, 750/1950/1000 -- Vista 32 SP1

or more generic

framerate -- screenname -- processor @ clock-speed -- video card(s), GPU OC -- OS

All scores listed here, ranked by highest FPS:

DX9 Results (Setup Type #1): 1280x1024, No AA, Game Quality: High.
---- Avg. FPS ----- Username ------ CPU/Speed ------------- GPU/OC ------------ OS
01.) 109.24 fps - iggster -- i7 965 @ 4.43 -- 3x GTX280s (3 GPUs), 716/1489/1282 -- Vista 64
02.) 93.03 fps -- nuclearjock -- i7 940 @ 3.8 -- 2x GTX280s, 621/1584/1000 -- Vista 64
03.) 86.66 fps -- Litlratt -- qx9650 @ 4.05 -- 2x 9800GX2 (4 GPUs), stock -- Vista 64
04.) 85.94 fps -- secretsexyninja -- e8400 @ 3.8 -- 9800GX2 (NO specs) -- Vista 64
05.) 83.18 fps -- sgtdisturbed47 -- e8400 @ 4.28 -- GTX 280, 690/1485/1200 -- XP SP3
06.) 80.42 fps -- USFORCES -- e8600 @ 4.0 -- GTX 280 -- Vista 64
07.) 80.28 fps -- {core2duo}werd -- e8400 @ 4.0 -- 9800GX2 (2 GPUs) -- Vista 64
08.) 78.10 fps -- badoldman -- q9650 @ 3.6 -- 2x GTX 260s (2 GPUs) -- XP SP3
09.) 75.94 fps -- SergeRY -- e8400 @ 3.83 -- 2x 9800GTXs (2 GPUs) 891/2228/1229 -- XP SP2
10.) 75.28 fps -- deadmeat -- e8500 @ 4.16 -- 2x 9800 GTXs, stock -- Vista
11.) 74.93 fps -- Slightly skewed -- q6600 -- GTX280, 725/1209/1591 -- Vista 64
12.) 74.55 fps -- fuzzynutz -- q6600 @ 3.8 -- 9800GX2 (2 GPUs), 702/1782/1053 -- Vista 64
13.) 74.15 fps -- D3TH.GRUNT -- e8400 @ 4.0 --GTX260, 735/1585/1151 -- Vista 64
14.) 73.75 fps -- Clox -- e8400 @ 3.7 -- 2x 8800GTXs (2 GPUs) -- XP SP3
15.) 73.53 fps -- Gunslash -- e8600 @ 4.4 -- 2x GTX 280s (2 GPUs) -- Vista 64 SP1
16.) 72.70 fps -- wiggy2k7 -- q6600 @ 3.45 -- GTX260, 705/1748/1010 -- Vista 64
17.) 71.98 fps -- smileyguy -- q6600 @ 3.7 -- 2x GTX260's -- Vista 64
18.) 70.82 fps -- Tricky -- q6600 @ 3.6 -- GTX280, 720/1440/1300 -- XP SP3
19.) 70.80 fps -- ReignsOfPower -- q9650 @ 4.14 -- 4870X2 stock -- Vista 64 SP1
20.) 70.57 fps -- Emmett -- q6600 @ 4.0 -- 3x 8800 Ultras (3 GPUs) -- Vista 64
21.) 70.18 fps -- 2Luke2 -- e8400 @ 4.0 -- 3x 8800GTX (3 GPUs), 648/1596/1007 -- Vista 64
22.) 70.07 fps -- lordikon -- e8400 @ 3.75 -- 2x 8800GTS 512s, 785/1961/1064 -- Vista 32 SP1
23.) 69.02 fps -- IHatethedukes -- e8400 @ 3.15 -- 2x 8800GTS 512s, 774/1998/1101 -- Vista 64
24.) 68.73 fps -- Chickenman -- q6600 @ 3.6 -- GTX280 -- Vista 32
25.) 67.93 fps -- [FDG]Explosion -- q6600 @ 3.2 -- GTX280, 730/1826/1125 -- XP SP2

DX10 Results (Setup Type #2):1280x1024, No AA, Game Quality: High.
---- Avg. FPS ----- Username ------ CPU/Speed ------------- GPU/OC ------------ OS
01.) 87.84 fps -- iggster -- i7 965 @ 3.9 -- 3x GTX 280 (3 GPUs) -- Vista 64
02.) 84.77 fps -- Litlratt -- qx9650 @ 4.05 -- 2x 9800GX2 (4 GPUs), stock -- Vista 64
03.) 75.28 fps -- iggster -- qx9650 @ 4.0 -- 9800GX2 (2 GPUs) -- Vista 32
04.) 75.17 fps -- total90 -- e8500 @ 4.3 -- 9800GX2 (2 GPUs) -- Vista 64
05.) 73.79 fps -- USFORCES -- e8600 @ 4.0 -- GTX 280 -- Vista 64
06.) 71.63 fps -- SergeRY -- e8500 @ 4.04 -- 3x 9800GTXs (3 GPUs) 831/2055/1139 -- Vista 64
07.) 68.33 fps -- {core2duo}werd -- e8400 @ 4.0 -- 9800GX2 (2 GPUS), Vista 64
08.) 68.01 fps -- nuclearjock -- qx9650 @ 4.25 -- 2x 8800GTXs, 621/1566/1000, Vista 32
09.) 66.21 fps -- lordikon -- e8400 @ 3.8 -- 2x 8800GTS 512s, 785/1961/1064 -- Vista 32
10.) 64.47 fps -- fuzzynutz -- q6600 @ 3.6 -- 9800GX2 (2 GPUS) -- Vista 64
11.) 61.20 fps -- smileyguy -- q6600 @ 3.7 -- 2x GTX260's -- Vista 64
12.) 60.72 fps -- D3TH.GRUNT -- e8400 @ 4.0 --GTX260, 735/1585/1151 -- Vista 64
13.) 60.50 fps -- IHatethedukes -- e8400 -- 2x 8800GTS 512s -- Vista 64
14.) 60.45 fps -- lonnie5000 -- q6600 @ 3.42 -- 2x 8800GTS 512, 752/1916/1052 -- Vista 64
15.) 59.33 fps -- wiggy2k7 -- q6600 @ 3.45 -- GTX260, 705/1748/1010 -- Vista 32
16.) 59.15 fps -- jam3s -- q5550 @ 4.03 -- GTX260, 655/1400/1125 -- Vista 64
17.) 56.50 fps -- Xiob -- e8500 @ 4.21 -- 4870 stock -- Vista 64
18.) 54.17 fps -- kkbob33 -- e6300 @ 3.6 -- 2x 9600GTs, 761/1902/1003 -- Vista 32
19.) 53.79 fps -- 10acjed -- q6600 @ 3.40 -- 2x 8800GT, 700/1700/1000 -- Vista 32
20.) 53.41 fps -- jaybeerex -- q6600 @ 3.2 -- 2x 8800GT, 700/1800/1000 -- Vista 32
21.) 52.84 fps -- tat2monsta -- e6850 @ 3.0 -- 2x 8800GTX (2 GPUs) Stock -- Vista 64
22.) 51.94 fps -- binormalkilla -- q6600 @ 3.8 -- 2x 2900XT 1GBs Xfire, 940/1075 -- Vista 64
23.) 48.81 fps -- Bitemarks and bloodstains -- q6600 -- 4870 512 -- Vista 32
24.) 47.71 fps -- alexgheseger -- e6750 @ 4.2 -- 3870x2 + 3870 Trifire (3 GPUS), Vista 64
25.) 47.58 fps -- GTT -- q6600 @ 3.2 -- 8800 Ultra 730/1735/1185, Vista 32

-----------------------------------------------------

Extra types --- These types are higher resolutions, or settings with different details and/or settings......these are the ones that separate the men, from the boys. However, these results can not be proven with this benchmark program, so they're only for reference, and not for any kind of real competition. It may be nice to have them listed, but take them with a grain of salt. You cannot post results for this section unless you post base benchmarks for the standard settings at the top of this post. DO NOT use the benchmarks below unless your video card and monitor support the given resolutions, or you'll simply be tainting the results. By posting for this section you have agreed that you understand this.

DX9 1680x1050, High Detail, NO AA:
---- Avg. FPS ----- Username ------ CPU/Speed ------------- GPU/OC ------------ OS
01.) 98.16 fps -- iggster -- 965 @ 4.43 -- 3x GTX280s (3 GPUs), 716/1489/1282 -- Vista 64
02.) 76.28 fps -- Litlratt -- qx9650 @ 4.05 -- 2x 9800GX2 (4 GPUs), stock -- Vista 64
03.) 72.26 fps -- secretsexyninja -- e8400 @ 3.8 -- 9800GX2 (2 GPUs) -- Vista 64
04.) 73.84 fps -- sgtdisturbed47 -- e8400 @ 4.28 -- GTX 280, 690/1485/1200 -- XP SP3
05.) 69.35 fps -- {core2duo}werd -- e8400 @ 4.0 -- 9800GX2 (2 GPUs) 742/1855/1057, Vista 64
06.) 66.80 fps -- SergeRY -- e8500 @ 4.04 -- 3x 9800GTXs (3 GPUs) 831/2055/1139 -- Vista 64
07.) 62.05 fps -- 2Luke2 -- e8400 @ 4.0 -- 3x 8800GTX (3 GPUs), 648/1596/1007 -- Vista 64
08.) 60.78 fps -- IHatethedukes -- e8400 -- 2x 8800GTS 512s -- Vista 64
09.) 59.90 fps -- Tricky -- q6600 @ 3.6 -- GTX280, 720/1440/1300 -- XP SP3
10.) 56.81 fps -- sjjarvis1 -- q6600 @ 3.57 -- 2x 4870, Vista 32
11.) 55.19 fps -- grunion -- x3220 @ 3.6 -- 4870X2 + 4870 -- XP SP3
12.) 54.79 fps -- lonnie5000 -- q6600 @ 3.42 -- 2x 8800GTS 512, 752/1916/1052 -- Vista 64
13.) 51.40 fps -- alexgheseger -- e6750 @ 4.2 -- 3870x2 + 3870 Trifire (3 GPUS), Vista 64
14.) 48.84 fps -- gamervivek -- e2140 @ 3.2 -- 4850, 870/1125 -- XP SP2
15.) 47.84 fps -- lordikon -- e8400 @ 3.8 -- 2x 8800GTS 512s, 785/1961/1064 -- Vista 32
16.) 46.95 fps -- waqasr -- q6600 @ 3.6 -- 8800GTS 512 -- Vista 32 SP1
17.) 42.98 fps -- jaybeerex -- q6600 @ 3.2 -- 2x 8800GT, 700/1800/1000 -- Vista 32
18.) 41.47 fps -- So3oL4Nu -- e4500 @ 3.2 -- 8800GTS 512, 800/2001/1151 -- XP SP2
19.) 38.62 fps -- tat2monsta -- e6850 @ 3.0 -- 2x 8800GTX (2 GPUs) Stock -- Vista 64
20.) 37.72 fps -- Buster2010 -- x3 8650 -- 2x HD4850 -- XP SP3
21.) 33.37 fps -- Sharpy -- e8400 @ 3.0 -- 8800GTS 512 stock -- XP SP2
22.) 24.91 fps -- Sethorama -- 5400+ -- 9600GSO stock -- Vista 32
23.) 20.15 fps -- ImmortalKenny -- e6420 @ 3.0 -- 8800GTS 320, 650/1450/950 -- Vista 64


DX10 1680x1050, High Detail, NO AA:
---- Avg. FPS ----- Username ------ CPU/Speed ------------- GPU/OC ------------ OS
01.) 78.28 fps -- iggster -- 965 @ 3.9 -- 3x GTX 280 (3 GPUs) -- Vista 64
02.) 73.06 fps -- Litlratt -- qx9650 @ 4.05 -- 2x 9800GX2 (4 GPUs), stock -- Vista 64
03.) 65.47 fps -- secretsexyninja -- e8400 @ 3.8 -- 9800GX2 (NO specs) -- Vista 64
04.) 62.37 fps -- SergeRY -- e8500 @ 4.04 -- 3x 9800GTXs (3 GPUs) 831/2055/1139 -- Vista 64
06.) 62.19 fps -- {core2duo}werd -- e8400 @ 4.0 -- 2x 9800GX2 (4 GPUS), Vista 64
07.) 51.61 fps -- lonnie5000 -- q6600 @ 3.42 -- 2x 8800GTS 512, 752/1916/1052 -- Vista 64
08.) 46.03 fps -- tat2monsta -- e6850 @ 3.0 -- 2x 8800GTX (2 GPUs) Stock -- Vista 64
09.) 45.83 fps -- lordikon -- e8400 @ 3.8 -- 2x 8800GTS 512s, 785/1961/1064 -- Vista 32
10.) 45.27 fps -- jaybeerex -- q6600 @ 3.2 -- 2x 8800GT, 700/1800/1000 -- Vista 32
11.) 19.37 fps -- sizeak -- e6300 @ 2.63 -- X1900GT stock -- Vista 64
12.) 13.50 fps -- ImmortalKenny -- e6420 @ 3.0 -- 8800GTS 320, 650/1450/950 -- Vista 64

DX9 1680x1050, High Detail, 4x AA:
---- Avg. FPS ----- Username ------ CPU/Speed ------------- GPU/OC ------------ OS
01.) 75.93 fps -- iggster -- 965 @ 3.9 -- 3x GTX 280 (3 GPUs) -- Vista 64
02.) 62.24 fps -- Litlratt -- qx9650 @ 4.05 -- 2x 9800GX2 (4 GPUs), stock -- Vista 64
03.) 60.57 fps -- Emmett -- q6600 @ 4.0 -- 3x 8800 Ultras (3 GPUS -- Vista 64
04.) 53.36 fps -- kkbob33 -- q6600 @ 3.6 -- 4870, 800/1000 -- Vista 64
05.) 47.15 fps -- Tricky -- q6600 @ 3.6 -- GTX280, 720/1440/1300 -- XP SP3
06.) 37.41 fps -- tat2monsta -- e6850 @ 3.0 -- 2x 8800GTX (2 GPUs) Stock -- Vista 64
07.) 35.87 fps -- moward -- e8400 @ 3.6 -- 2x 8800GTS 640s, 620/1550/1000 -- XP SP2
08.) 27.16 fps -- brettjv -- e6550 @ 3.33 -- 8800GTS 512, 810/1944/1145 -- XP SP2
09.) 26.28 fps -- Greg121986 -- q6600 @ 3.6 -- 8800GTS 512, 764/1908/1069 -- XP SP2

DX10 1680x1050, High Detail, 4x AA:
---- Avg. FPS ----- Username ------ CPU/Speed ------------- GPU/OC ------------ OS
01.) 79.25 fps -- iggster -- 965 @ 3.9 -- 3x GTX 280 (3 GPUs) -- Vista 64
02.) 65.45 fps -- Litlratt -- q9650 @ 3.6 -- 3x GTX280, stock -- Vista 64
03.) 37.43 fps -- tat2monsta -- e6850 @ 3.0 -- 2x 8800GTX (2 GPUs) Stock -- Vista 64
04.) 31.58 fps -- binormalkilla -- q6600 @ 3.83 -- 2x 2900XT 1GBs Xfire, 940/1075 -- Vista 64

DX10 1680x1050, Very-High Detail, NO AA:
---- Avg. FPS ----- Username ------ CPU/Speed ------------- GPU/OC ------------ OS
01.) 62.94 fps -- iggster -- 965 @ 3.9 -- 3x GTX 280 (3 GPUs) -- Vista 64
02.) 55.27 fps -- Litlratt -- qx9650 @ 4.05 -- 2x 9800GX2 (4 GPUs), stock -- Vista 64
03.) 45.27 fps -- SergeRY -- e8500 @ 4.04 -- 3x 9800GTXs (3 GPUs) 831/2055/1139 -- Vista 64
04.) 36.18 fps -- ReignsOfPower -- q9650 @ 4.14 -- 4870X2 stock -- Vista 64 SP1
05.) 32.91 fps -- lordikon -- e8400 @ 3.6 -- 2x 8800GTS 512s, 785/1961/1064 -- Vista 32
06.) 31.12 fps -- tat2monsta -- e6850 @ 3.0 -- 2x 8800GTX (2 GPUs) Stock -- Vista 64

DX10 1920x1200, Very-High Detail, NO AA:
---- Avg. FPS ----- Username ------ CPU/Speed ------------- GPU/OC ------------ OS
01.) 80.26 fps -- iggster -- 965 @ 4.43 -- 3x GTX280s (3 GPUs), 716/1489/1282 -- Vista 64
02.) 68.98 fps -- nuclearjock -- 940 @ 4.2 -- 2 GTX295 (4 GPUs), 704/1536/1152 -- Vista 64
02.) 58.41 fps -- Litlratt -- qx9650 @ 4.05 -- 3x GTX280s -- Vista 64
03.) 45.24 fps -- deadmeat -- e8500 @ 4.16 -- 2x 9800 GTXs, stock -- Vista
04.) 40.76 fps -- SergeRY -- e8500 @ 4.04 -- 3x 9800GTXs (3 GPUs) 831/2055/1139 -- Vista 64
05.) 40.55 fps -- porky -- q6600 @ 3.2 -- 2x 9800GTXs, 900/2200/1250 -- Vista 64
06.) 29.41 fps -- Gunslash -- e8600 @ 4.4 -- 2x GTX 280s (2 GPUs) -- Vista 64 SP1

You can download the demo from http://www.ea.com/crysis if you don't own Crysis, the demo should be enough to run the benchmarks.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Crysis seems to be a pretty good standard for GPU benchmarking, because it is notoriously difficult to reach 60fps at decent settings for most computers.

[lordikon]

Here's my first run. I had to lower my OC due to recent instabilities, but this'll do for now.



3/7/2008 1:15:26 AM - Vista

Run #1- DX9 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 52.98



Run #1- DX10 1280x1024 AA=No AA, 32 bit test, Quality: High ~~ Overall Average FPS: 53.265

Lol, higher framerate in DX10, and I left a bunch of progs open when I ran my DX10 run.

[lordikon]

lol, make the thread by request then noone uses it. Don't be afraid guys, Crysis won't bite.....hard.

[Benny99]

Wait Crysis is a game ?

is it ? im not sure or is it just a benchmark like 3dmark06 lawlzzzz...

Well here is mine anyway

[lordikon]

You should run at the speced settings though (see first post). The point of this thread was to get everyone on the same settings so we have an accurate comparison. Thanks for the only response to the thread so far though

[bleachigo]

Never really ran the crysis benchmark.How do u do it anyways?Will post results as soon as i know.Thanks.

[The_Parrot]

can it be downloaded or is the game needed ha.

[lordikon]

You should be able to run the benchmark even with the Crysis demo version.

You can download the demo from http://www.ea.com/crysis

To download the benchmark tool, google for Crysis 1.05 Benchmark Tool. I wonder if we could get the tool put on overclock.net download section, it is a very small file.

[kkbob33]

DX9-38.58fps


DX1038.89fps


i get the same score in DX10 as in DX9. ...might be because im on vista.


anyway,im happy with it. for now

[lordikon]

Updated kkbob33. Thanks.