|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Benchmarks > Benchmarking Software and Discussion | |
Shin2k35's Vista DX10 vs DX9 and 32bit vs 64bit
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
Crysis
8800GT @1024x768 Vista 32bit DX9 High 59.69FPS @1024x768 Vista 64bit DX9 High 53.85FPS @1024x768 Vista 32bit DX10 High 45.9FPS @1024x768 Vista 64bit DX10 high 47.7FPS @1024x768 And the fabled Very High Vista 32bit DX10 Very High 32.1FPS @1024x768 Vista 64bit DX10 Very High 31.66FPS @1024x768 SLI 8800GT's @1024x768 Vista 32bit DX9 High 54.84FPS @1024x768 Vista 64bit DX9 High 47.43FPS @1024x768 Vista 32bit DX10 High 49.9FPS @1024x768 Vista 64bit DX10 high 45.80FPS @1024x768 And Very High Vista 32bit DX10 Very High 42.05FPS @1024x768 Vista 64bit DX10 Very High 37.34FPS @1024x768 Now for SLI 8800GT's @1680x1050 Vista 32bit DX9 High SLI 47.73FPS @1680x1050 Vista 64bit DX9 High SLI 42.28FPS @1680x1050 Vista 32bit DX10 High SLI 41.52FPS@1680x1050 Vista 64bit DX10 High SLI 37.35FPS@1680x1050 And again for Very High Vista 32bit DX10 Very High SLI 26.94FPS @1680x1050 Vista 64bit DX10 Very High SLI 28.22FPS @1680x1050 ![]() Crysis was run on Lucious P. Farthingwinkle More added soon.
__________________
Last edited by Shin2k35 : 2 Weeks Ago at 12:02 PM. |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
|
Am I really the only person to comment on this?
Nice benchmark, thank you. I don't feel bad about keeping Vista32
__________________
We Are Gr33n Machine
Project Atlantis "Signature your on it put, backwards this read to enough dumb were you if." Disclaimer: Everything I say is my own opinion unless I provide evidence.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
It's GIRRRREAT!
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The SSV Normandy
Posts: 6,044
Rep: 562
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 354
Trader Rating: 40
|
Yea there goes that idiot Cevats' claim that x64 bit users will see a 15% increase over 32 bit :/
__________________Not a flame towards you at all. Thank you for the tests Just goes to show how much Crytek have lied.
Last edited by TnB= Gir : 07-15-08 at 03:32 PM. |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
ya but when u think about it...
__________________u get better graphics with dx10 better graphics doesnt always mean more fps
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Intel Overclocker
|
What? He's comparing the same settings, just with Vista x86 and x64. He didn't say anything about DX9 and DX10, he just said that Crytek lied about Crysis running 15% faster on a x64 system than on a x86 system, with the same settings enabled, whether it's high, very high, DX9, or DX10, it's not a 15% increase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
The only one that fairs better is the DX10 64bit High settings. but 2FPS isn't 15%. lol
Perhaps there's better results to be seen at higher resolutions. I'll be adding those when I get a faster card.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
Updated this. Added SLI configuration for 1024x768 and 1680x1050.
It actually looks as thought SLI DECREASED performance at 1024x768. Could someone please take these results and make a graph out of them comparing DX9 to DX10, 64bit to 32bit, SLI to Single GPU etc etc. So we can get a really good look at all the different results?
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
You should do a DX9 very high hack test as well. And at the moment, DX10 does NOT really produce better graphics. It's actually hard as hell to tell the difference between the DX9 hack and actual DX10. In Crysis anyway.
__________________As for the other games I have, I see no difference.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
As far as I can tell, I can run the Very High bench with DX9 ticked. I don't fancy messing with my config files, though.
Also, in reflection, those 1024x768 SLI results are very decieving. Their highest at one point was around 70FPS, which wans't acheived at all during single GPU tests.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
pm me, i can make charts
__________________
![]() -85 Camaro-![]() ![]() XBL = DuffyDidIt
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|