|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Software, Programming and Coding > Coding and Programming | |
Strange question...
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Overclocker in Training
|
True or false: the faster a computer can calculate long division problems, the higher the overall performance.
__________________This is a question on my take-home test and the professor never went over this as well as I am having a horrible time finding the answer. Thanks.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
The 100 Mega Shock!
|
There are a lot of factors that can determine a system's overall performance. But yeah, I'd say long division would do it.
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Intel Overclocker
|
Well I would think faster = more performance. I mean, there are other factors when determining overall system performance, but for pure mathematics, faster would be better.
__________________
My lapped q6600 and Tuniq Tower Folding for OCN Killed my first motherboard due to overclock on 5/17/08 - I'll miss you P5N-E SLI
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Hebrew Hammer
![]() |
A better measure would be floating point calculations which were decisive between AMD and Intel for a number of years.
To answer your question would be yes. SuperPi, if you haven't heard of it, is a program which calculates PI to various decimal places. The faster the system the better overall score with regard to time.
__________________
| PC Audio Setup: JRiver Media Center ASIO(FLAC) > E-MU 0404 USB > LD MKIII > Grado SR225 / HD555 Fold for 37726 Folding Team "Just Be Cause" Honorary Member
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
that logic makes sense
__________________
Games i'm Looking Forward To: Fable 2(360), Halo Wars(360), Stargate Worlds(PC), Mercenaries 2 (360), Mafia II (PC), Spore (PC)
My 3DMark06 score: 10,357 Click Me The Stargate Club We Are The Red Tide Mozilla Firefox Club Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Kernel Sanders
|
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |||||||||
|
Chiefly Ignorant
|
Quote:
I don't consider this a good question, because it really is asking you to guess at the instructor's assumptions. All things remaining equal, this statement is true. In general, given two "comparable systems", the statement is also true (which means not always, but usually true). But since he hasn't stated his assumptions, you have to ask yourself is he a detail-oriented kind of guy, or does he like generalizations? The faster a computer can calculate long division problems, the higher the overall performance of long division calculation. Now THAT'S true. "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." - Mark Twain et al
__________________
|
|||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|