|
|
|
 |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Software, Programming and Coding > Coding and Programming | |
What is your web size??
|
||
| View Poll Results: What size sites do you design or prefer? | |||
| 800 x 600 |
   
|
3 | 12.00% |
| 1024 x 768 |
  
|
9 | 36.00% |
| 1152 x 864 |
  
|
1 | 4.00% |
| 1280 x 1024 |
  
|
7 | 28.00% |
| 1600 x 1200 |
  
|
5 | 20.00% |
| Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
10-10-09
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Overclocker in Training
 
|
What is your web size??
As the question asks, what is the size you guys prefer to design in for websites? I am new in this area, ive spent my 15 years as a print designer and im starting to learn the digital side. I know how to do flash well. I will be nose deep in the web area at the beginning of the year. I dont know Actionscipt, but i hear its very similar to java. Now im just trying to get my site up and ive got the general design done, my business tends to a wide range. So im debating on 1152x864. What what you guys use and why?
__________________
Last edited by graphicsman : 10-10-09 at 11:59 PM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
10-10-09
|
#2 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
AMD Overclocker
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 706
Rep: 57
 Unique Rep: 54
Trader Rating: 0
|
kind of a mis leading title i would say
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
10-10-09
|
#3 (permalink) | ||||||||||
|
Database Developer
|
I design to 1024x768
Just makes life easier
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
10-10-09
|
#4 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
nVidia Enthusiast
|
1024x768, because alot of people use this res.
Also: Misleading thread title is misleading 
__________________
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
10-10-09
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
The Dapper Swindler
 
|
1280x1024 or 1280x800(widescreen). By FAR the most common resolutions out there right now.
Or if you want to be nice design it at 1024x600 and make it expand to fit any resolution.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
10-10-09
|
#6 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Overclocker in Training
|
whoops, lol, what should i call it then
EDIT: changed
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
10-10-09
|
#7 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 5,894
Rep: 226
Unique Rep: 166
Trader Rating: 14
|
Yeah, that thread title makes me wonder what you're really after... I was actually going to say something along the lines of 15.6"
__________________
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
10-11-09
|
#8 (permalink) | ||||||||
|
Linux Lobbyist
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Gold Coast Chicago
Posts: 1,350
Rep: 112
Unique Rep: 96
Trader Rating: 23
|
I agree with the 1024x768...with the (now not so recent) rise in netbooks and smaller screens with lower resolutions, this is, and should be, at the forefront of most site designs. Not saying I don't like taking full use of a nice 1920x1200 or better screen, but the lower res on site design also allows for easier multitasking.
__________________
Silverstone Cases for Sale, Full Tower and mATX
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
10-11-09
|
#9 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Overclocker in Training
|
when you guys do your logos or pictures, to you use mainly GIF ( i know for transparent its great) or JPEG, and if you use Adobe, do you save it for web or just out right?
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
10-11-09
|
#10 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
nVidia Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Phoenix, ARIZONA!!!!!!
Posts: 971
Rep: 75
Unique Rep: 66
Trader Rating: 0
|
my screen is 1360x768 so it needs to fit in on this, newegg for example does not, however i usually force the client to have enough content to be atleast 1200px tall for you few big monitor ppl. and the background image, IF any is always atleast 1600x1200, for those same big monitor ppl.
__________________
MY FOR SALE THREAD
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
[Project] Acid Fire
