|
|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Realm of Illusion
![]() ![]() |
Program Category: Temperature Monitoring
From Publisher: Quote:
Current Version: 2.70 Publisher: unclewebb ![]()
Last edited by mega_option101 : 1 Week Ago at 09:47 AM. |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Audiophile
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Sydney , Australia
Posts: 1,313
Rep: 94
![]() Unique Rep: 82
Trader Rating: 1
|
Core temp is still more accurate
At idle this shows 20 and 22 Core temp 26 and 27 And considering my ambient is 18 i dont think it would only be 4 degress higher ![]()
__________________
Custom Sound : Foobar (FLAC) > Auzentech Prelude > Kordz 3.5 to RCA > Corda Areitta > Alessandro MS-2 http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=405632 3.7ghz
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
51° 31' 0 N 0° -6' 0 E
|
Quote:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/....php?p=2809778 Besides apparently in production when the temp probe thing is placed if it is out by 1mm can give 5+c difference in readings so all in all temps are probably best used as a 'rough indicator' at best. When you have a core reading a different temp from another core its more than likely due to the sensor rather than the actual core heating differently.
__________________
The world is a book, and those who do not travel read only a page.--Augustine (354-430) Last edited by cognoscenti : 04-21-08 at 08:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Quote:
IHS Removals, How to do it, Should I do it, and the Facts!![]() How To: Get more from your X1900XT(X) OCZ RAM owners club!![]() Intel Penryn (45nm) Thread GIGABYTE P35-DS4 Thread ß₤ứə Çřёώ
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
RT is more accurate for my setup. Its good to have it here in the DL section. If it works then use it if not then don't. Thanks mega.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Realm of Illusion
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I am trying to give more "Temperature Monitoring" alternatives for our members/guests to experiment with. This particular application was brought to my attention, as in some cases it recorded better then Core Temp.
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
|
isn't real temp best used with the 45nm chips anyways?
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Realm of Illusion
![]() ![]() |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
It's GIRRRREAT!
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The SSV Normandy
Posts: 6,049
Rep: 562
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 354
Trader Rating: 40
|
Hmm, I'm not sure what to trust here. Core temp reads low 40C idle for my Q6600@ 3.7ghz and real temp reads 33-33-25-28 idle. My ambient is 19-20C, so it's believable. I would love to believe real temp, but I'm not quite sure
__________________![]()
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Realm of Illusion
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]()
|
||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| download, realtemp |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|