<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Overclock.net - Overclocking.net - Benchmarking Software and Discussion</title>
		<link>http://www.overclock.net/</link>
		<description />
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:19:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>1</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>HDD Bench General Usage</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/612952-hdd-bench-general-usage.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:49:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi, I need a hard disk benchmarking utility that is accurate as possible but tests the performance of a drive with a selection of files to get overall performace rating compared to another drive. The reason for this is i have an ISCSI drive and i need to see what its like compared to the original...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi, I need a hard disk benchmarking utility that is accurate as possible but tests the performance of a drive with a selection of files to get overall performace rating compared to another drive. The reason for this is i have an ISCSI drive and i need to see what its like compared to the original drives in the server<br />
<br />
oh ive already tryed HDTach and it gave very strange results in windows 7. tho Diskbench seemed to make more sence<br />
<br />
Thanks</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Squeeky</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/612952-hdd-bench-general-usage.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Help with vantage</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/612497-help-vantage.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:45:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I have vantage installed and all ready to go and I sign up for the free trial key. Check my mail, not in there, sign up with another email not in there either. SO I try one more email, still not in there. So if anyone can get me a free trial key +1 rep for you.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have vantage installed and all ready to go and I sign up for the free trial key. Check my mail, not in there, sign up with another email not in there either. SO I try one more email, still not in there. So if anyone can get me a free trial key +1 rep for you.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Tom1121</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/612497-help-vantage.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Another is my vantage score right thread</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/612388-another-my-vantage-score-right-thread.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:34:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I ran the trial version of 3d mark vantage - performance and all default settings 
 
My GPU seems low though? Don't normally gtx 260's 216 cores get 10,000? 
 
http://s2.photobucket.com/albums/y10/bgilb/vantagescore.png...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I ran the trial version of 3d mark vantage - performance and all default settings<br />
<br />
My GPU seems low though? Don't normally gtx 260's 216 cores get 10,000?<br />
<br />
<a href="http://s2.photobucket.com/albums/y10/bgilb/?action=view&amp;current=vantagescore.png" target="_blank">http://s2.photobucket.com/albums/y10/bgilb/vantagescore.png</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>bgilb</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/612388-another-my-vantage-score-right-thread.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>No Score in Vantage</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/611510-no-score-vantage.html</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:09:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I was wondering if someone can help me here. I apologise in advance if this is the wrong place to post this, I looked at other forums and this seemed the most relevant. I just ran Vantage for the first time, and it gave me no 3DMark score. It rated my GPU score 10109 and my CPU score 38040, but I...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I was wondering if someone can help me here. I apologise in advance if this is the wrong place to post this, I looked at other forums and this seemed the most relevant. I just ran Vantage for the first time, and it gave me no 3DMark score. It rated my GPU score 10109 and my CPU score 38040, but I got no 3DMark score. Can anyone tell me why that could be? I'm running the Windows 7 RC Client and everything runs well, except I got no 3D score. If someone here could help me, I'd be grateful. Thanks in advance!</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>SaiyanFury</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/611510-no-score-vantage.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat benchmark Released</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/611074-s-t-l-k-e-r.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:54:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[http://www.stalker-game.com/en/?page=news&item=150 
 
really bland benchmark. It looks bland, even w/ directx 11 and "ultra" preset. 
 
 
http://files.gsc-game.com/st/bench/stkcop-bench-setup.exe 
 
http://www.techpowerup.com/?92972]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.stalker-game.com/en/?page=news&amp;item=150" target="_blank">http://www.stalker-game.com/en/?page=news&amp;item=150</a><br />
<br />
really bland benchmark. It looks bland, even w/ directx 11 and &quot;ultra&quot; preset.<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://files.gsc-game.com/st/bench/stkcop-bench-setup.exe" target="_blank">http://files.gsc-game.com/st/bench/s...ench-setup.exe</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.techpowerup.com/?92972" target="_blank">http://www.techpowerup.com/?92972</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Gabkicks</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/611074-s-t-l-k-e-r.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Does my vantage score indicate a problem ?</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/610911-does-my-vantage-score-indicate-problem.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:01:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi Guys,  
 
Just a quick question - ive recently downloaded and run the trial version of 3DMark Vantage. Given the rig in my signature, is a score of 10316 around what you would have expected ?.  
 
Ive been searching around the forums for similarly specced systems, and I *think* that looks lower...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi Guys, <br />
<br />
Just a quick question - ive recently downloaded and run the trial version of 3DMark Vantage. Given the rig in my signature, is a score of 10316 around what you would have expected ?. <br />
<br />
Ive been searching around the forums for similarly specced systems, and I *think* that looks lower than I should be hitting. Im not particularly benchmark driven, but can anyone shed some light on whether a) this is correct and b) if not does it indicate something is wrong ?. <br />
<br />
+reps for all useful information as usual :)<br />
<br />
Thanks people.<br />
<br />
R.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>M@verick</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/610911-does-my-vantage-score-indicate-problem.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Hows this 3DMark06 score?</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/610743-hows-3dmark06-score.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:28:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Finally re-overclocked my system as seen in my specs below and I got 14688. How's the result? Last time I ran the test my highest was 13500 so big improvement it seems :D Was hoping for 15k though :mad:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Finally re-overclocked my system as seen in my specs below and I got 14688. How's the result? Last time I ran the test my highest was 13500 so big improvement it seems :D Was hoping for 15k though :mad:</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Vitaminx</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/610743-hows-3dmark06-score.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Blue and Green Disk Icons in Crysis Bench Tool</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/610411-blue-green-disk-icons-crysis-bench.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:20:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[When I run the Mad Boris Crysis Benchmarking Tool, there are two icons shaped like 3.5" floppies that flash in the upper left corner.  
One of them is blue, the other is green.  
I've used this benchmark on several systems, and they all flash to some degree. 
Obviously, they are indicating some...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>When I run the Mad Boris Crysis Benchmarking Tool, there are two icons shaped like 3.5&quot; floppies that flash in the upper left corner. <br />
One of them is blue, the other is green. <br />
I've used this benchmark on several systems, and they all flash to some degree.<br />
Obviously, they are indicating some sort of disk access, but my questions are: <br />
<br />
1.  Why two separate icons, <br />
2.  What does each one indicate.  <br />
<br />
<br />
TIA,   Bruce.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>FerdinandII</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/610411-blue-green-disk-icons-crysis-bench.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>hard drive test</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/610348-hard-drive-test.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:25:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Have a look at this and tell me what you think? 
 
http://www.overclock.net/hard-drives-storage/609967-my-hard-driveraid-any-good.html 
 
cheers</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Have a look at this and tell me what you think?<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.overclock.net/hard-drives-storage/609967-my-hard-driveraid-any-good.html" target="_blank">http://www.overclock.net/hard-drives...-any-good.html</a><br />
<br />
cheers</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>wozza_bruv</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/610348-hard-drive-test.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>3dmark06 lower score after .. ?</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/609751-3dmark06-lower-score-after.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 13:31:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[hello people 
 
i had my cpu overclocked to 3.36 ghz 
 
and my evga 9800gtx superclocked stock 
 
i got 13537 
 
so i OCed my CPU to 3.4 <-- and i got lower score after test]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>hello people<br />
<br />
i had my cpu overclocked to 3.36 ghz<br />
<br />
and my evga 9800gtx superclocked stock<br />
<br />
i got 13537<br />
<br />
so i OCed my CPU to 3.4 &lt;-- and i got lower score after test<br />
<br />
so i thought it was from the Temp then i got back to 3.36<br />
<br />
and did the test again ... still getting low scores !<br />
<br />
under 13000<br />
<br />
and now i oced my 9800gtx i finally got the 13537 back !<br />
<br />
what happened ? was I having bugs before and getting higher scores ?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>dr34m3r</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/609751-3dmark06-lower-score-after.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>benchmark software that shows individual results ?</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/609273-benchmark-software-shows-individual-results.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:02:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[hello  
 
i'm currently looking for a benchmark program that lets me see the freqency table . 
i'm looking for this so i can use that data for my task i got in the lesson of statistics. Since we could choose wich statistic we could use i thought this was the one that intrested me the most. please...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>hello <br />
<br />
i'm currently looking for a benchmark program that lets me see the freqency table .<br />
i'm looking for this so i can use that data for my task i got in the lesson of statistics. Since we could choose wich statistic we could use i thought this was the one that intrested me the most. please let me know as soon as possible due to some bad data (i did not get to choose until it all went wrong ) we lost a lot of time <br />
<br />
greetings Dr. Agon</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Dr.Agon</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/609273-benchmark-software-shows-individual-results.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>is 5,8 windows in Windows Experience Index good?</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/608695-5-8-windows-windows-experience-index.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:47:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>PLEASE TELL ME :) 
 
is 5,8 windows in Windows Experience Index good?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>PLEASE TELL ME :)<br />
<br />
is 5,8 windows in Windows Experience Index good?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>battleaxe230</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/608695-5-8-windows-windows-experience-index.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>do i have a problem?</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/608536-do-i-have-problem.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 03:33:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[ok so as you can see on my sig i got a Q6600 oc to 3.4ghz. a gts 250 oc core 785 mhz shaders 1952 mhz and the memory 1201 mhz. and i do not have the 8500 gt as physx any more.  when i do 3d mark my gpu score seems low? it was 6650 and my cpu is 12239. shouldn't my gpu be higher?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>ok so as you can see on my sig i got a Q6600 oc to 3.4ghz. a gts 250 oc core 785 mhz shaders 1952 mhz and the memory 1201 mhz. and i do not have the 8500 gt as physx any more.  when i do 3d mark my gpu score seems low? it was 6650 and my cpu is 12239. shouldn't my gpu be higher?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>booby219</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/608536-do-i-have-problem.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MSI Afterburner Overclocking Competition</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/608506-msi-afterburner-overclocking-competition.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:41:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>MSI Afterburner Overclocking Competition coming up - GPU overclocking. 
 
 
 
---Quote--- 
MSI will launch a worldwide “pure VGA overclocking competition” from 2009/11/18 to 2009/12/18. It will be only for MSI N9000/N200/R4000/R5000 graphics card + afterburner, so almost every MSI customer can join...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>MSI Afterburner Overclocking Competition coming up - GPU overclocking.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				MSI will launch a worldwide “pure VGA overclocking competition” from 2009/11/18 to 2009/12/18. It will be only for MSI N9000/N200/R4000/R5000 graphics card + afterburner, so almost every MSI customer can join this event.<br />
<br />
This event is totally different from the other VGA competition. We don’t focus on “highest performance”, but this time we focus on the “highest overclocking percentage”. So winner may not use the best card like GTX 295 or HD 4870x2, but 9400GT or HD 4350 if they can squeeze the biggest overclocking capability from it…. 
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div><br />
More details and contest entry at<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.guru3d.com/contest/" target="_blank">http://www.guru3d.com/contest/</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>sno.lcn</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/608506-msi-afterburner-overclocking-competition.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Who's your Daddy]]></title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/608385-whos-your-daddy.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:33:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[LOL my first '03 glitch score. 
Going for the WR, if only for a couple of hours :D 
 
178951 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=6218846)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>LOL my first '03 glitch score.<br />
Going for the WR, if only for a couple of hours :D<br />
<br />
<a href="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=6218846" target="_blank">178951</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>grunion</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/608385-whos-your-daddy.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>question about my possible new build</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/608239-question-about-my-possible-new-build.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:47:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>just a real quick question, how well do you think an ati 5770 would perform with a core i5 in crisis? 
 
if i overclocked the cpu and gpu how much more performance could i get?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>just a real quick question, how well do you think an ati 5770 would perform with a core i5 in crisis?<br />
<br />
if i overclocked the cpu and gpu how much more performance could i get?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>funky882</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/608239-question-about-my-possible-new-build.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Vantage &06]]></title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/608044-vantage-06-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 08:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Getting 16500 on vantage 
Getting 18500 on 06. Look ok? 
On sig rig, cards at stock.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Getting 16500 on vantage<br />
Getting 18500 on 06. Look ok?<br />
On sig rig, cards at stock.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Newbie2009</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/608044-vantage-06-a.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>OC issues?</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/606870-oc-issues.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:49:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Old system 
evga 680i  
q6600 at 3825 suicide run 1700x9 1:1 
ram at 4-4-4-12 1t 850mhz 2gb 2x1 
8800gtx sli at 648 / 1512 / 1000 (oc'ed) 
750w psu with 18a per 12v rail (combined load of 60a /dunno watts) 
169.xx drivers 
3dmark06 20052 
win xp sp2 x86]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Old system<br />
evga 680i <br />
q6600 at 3825 suicide run 1700x9 1:1<br />
ram at 4-4-4-12 1t 850mhz 2gb 2x1<br />
8800gtx sli at 648 / 1512 / 1000 (oc'ed)<br />
750w psu with 18a per 12v rail (combined load of 60a /dunno watts)<br />
169.xx drivers<br />
3dmark06 20052<br />
win xp sp2 x86<br />
<br />
New system<br />
evga 680i<br />
q9650 at 3825 13 passes of lintest at maximum settings 100% stable<br />
ram at 5-5-5-15 1t 850mhz 4gb 2x2<br />
gtx275 ftw sli at 713 / 1560 / 1260 (stock)<br />
1000w psu with 24a per 12v rail (900W (75A) Combined)<br />
191.07 drivers<br />
win7 ultimate rc x64<br />
3dmark06<br />
SLI 183xx<br />
NON 190xx<br />
<br />
I bought the 1000w psu thinking my silverstone just didn't have enough juice to run it anymore.  I'm getting the same results.  I just don't know what is wrong here now.  I already ran lintest and thought 13 was enough times to run at max to say it was stable.  If you guys think more then I will.  I'm currently running memtest to double check on that.  Then I will run atitool and furmark on each card seperate to see any issues there. If you think it's something else please enlighten me. :(<br />
<br />
EDIT:<br />
cpu lintest max 13 passes stable<br />
memtest 110% 3 processes 1024/1024/remaining ram(900 something)<br />
atitool 20 min no errors at stock speed</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>Special_K</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/606870-oc-issues.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is it a normal score ? why is it low ?</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/606792-normal-score-why-low.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:41:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[today i've done a test on 3dmark06 
 
and i got this score : 10606 
 
is it low ? or normal ? 
 
 
evga 9800 gtx superclocked gpu 
e4500 @ 3.1 
4 gb Corsair 1066 RAM (Windows XP 32-bit = 3.5 gb)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>today i've done a test on 3dmark06<br />
<br />
and i got this score : 10606<br />
<br />
is it low ? or normal ?<br />
<br />
<br />
<font color="Red">evga 9800 gtx superclocked gpu<br />
e4500 @ 3.1<br />
4 gb Corsair 1066 RAM (Windows XP 32-bit = 3.5 gb)<br />
Using Sony LCD TV 32-inch<br />
Res : 1360x768</font></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>dr34m3r</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/606792-normal-score-why-low.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Extreme overclocked setup (aircooled) + scores</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/606598-extreme-overclocked-setup-aircooled-scores.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:08:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>decided to push my system. only to find out, that it crashed most times. 
so i placed the whole system near open window (at night) and had 3 big external fans blast cold air at the open side of it :D 
 
got some pretty cool results 
say what you think 
 
Phenom II 955BE @ 3.8ghz 
ATI sapphire...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>decided to push my system. only to find out, that it crashed most times.<br />
so i placed the whole system near open window (at night) and had 3 big external fans blast cold air at the open side of it :D<br />
<br />
got some pretty cool results<br />
say what you think<br />
<br />
Phenom II 955BE @ 3.8ghz<br />
ATI sapphire Vapour-X @ 975mhz(core speed) + 1200mhz (mem clock)<br />
<br />
3DMarkVantage: P10205<br />
3DMark06: 15195<br />
PerformanceTest 7.0: 1901.6<br />
<br />
For evidence goto: <div style="display: none;" id="ame_noshow_other_1258769961_1">
        <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTsdRzf8tds" title="YouTube- Overclocked.com: Extreme air cooled over clock: 955BE @ 3.8GHZ!!!" target="_blank">YouTube- Overclocked.com: Extreme air cooled over clock: 955BE @ 3.8GHZ!!!</a>
</div>
<div style="display: inline;" id="ame_doshow_other_1258769961_1">
<div align="center">
<table class="tborder" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="1" width="425" style="margin:10px 0">
<thead>
        <tr>
                <td class="tcat" colspan="2" style="text-align:center">
                        <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTsdRzf8tds" title="YouTube- Overclocked.com: Extreme air cooled over clock: 955BE @ 3.8GHZ!!!" target="_blank">YouTube- Overclocked.com: Extreme air cooled over clock: 955BE @ 3.8GHZ!!!</a>
                </td>
        </tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
        <tr>
                <td class="panelsurround" align="center">
<!-- AME YouTube -->
<object width="425" height="350">
<param name=''movie'' value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oTsdRzf8tds&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18&amp;fs=1"></param>
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param>
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oTsdRzf8tds&amp;ap=%2526fmt%3D18&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent"></embed></object>
</td>
        </tr>
</tbody>
</table></div>
</div>dont forget to check out my other vids :D hehe<br />
<br />
Pics:</div>


	<br />
	<div style="padding:6px">

	
		<fieldset class="fieldset">
			<legend>Attached Thumbnails</legend>
			<div style="padding:3px">
			
<a href="http://www.overclock.net/attachments/benchmarking-software-discussion/128789d1257808097-extreme-overclocked-setup-aircooled-scores-dsc02520.jpg" rel="Lightbox_7607956" id="attachment128789" target="_blank"><img class="thumbnail" src="http://www.overclock.net/attachments/benchmarking-software-discussion/128789d1257808097t-extreme-overclocked-setup-aircooled-scores-dsc02520.jpg" border="0" alt="Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02520.JPG
Views:	N/A
Size:	679.3 KB
ID:	128789" /></a>
&nbsp;

<a href="http://www.overclock.net/attachments/benchmarking-software-discussion/128790d1257808097-extreme-overclocked-setup-aircooled-scores-dsc02519.jpg" rel="Lightbox_7607956" id="attachment128790" target="_blank"><img class="thumbnail" src="http://www.overclock.net/attachments/benchmarking-software-discussion/128790d1257808097t-extreme-overclocked-setup-aircooled-scores-dsc02519.jpg" border="0" alt="Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC02519.JPG
Views:	N/A
Size:	662.9 KB
ID:	128790" /></a>
&nbsp;

			</div>
		</fieldset>
	

	

	

	

	</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>overclocked-dot-com</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/606598-extreme-overclocked-setup-aircooled-scores.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[OCCT & Intel burn LINPACK--ANYONE KNOW WHY--]]></title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/606332-occt-intel-burn-linpack-anyone-know.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:46:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Trying to figure this out when running LINPACK when it gets up to 100% every once in awhile it will freeze for a 1/2 seconds sometimes it will go 5 minutes fine, I'm just testing to see how high my temps get and they are fine it stay's below 50C at 100% load, No errors and games play fine, I never...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Trying to figure this out when running LINPACK when it gets up to 100% every once in awhile it will freeze for a 1/2 seconds sometimes it will go 5 minutes fine, I'm just testing to see how high my temps get and they are fine it stay's below 50C at 100% load, No errors and games play fine, I never have any problems. Maybe 64bit, Drivers ?  I don't know like I said it passes the linpack test with no errors...<br />
<br />
Edit: Voltage is fine and have switched out the memory...<br />
<br />
At all stock settings 3.0Ghz it also does it, <u>Anyone know what causes this or ever had this issue?</u></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>USFORCES</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/606332-occt-intel-burn-linpack-anyone-know.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is this 3dMark Vantage score matching of my OC and setup?</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/605227-3dmark-vantage-score-matching-my-oc.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:34:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Image: http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt359/alexsoon1984/bench2.jpg</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img src="http://i627.photobucket.com/albums/tt359/alexsoon1984/bench2.jpg" border="0" alt="" onload="NcodeImageResizer.createOn(this);" /></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>overclockerz</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/605227-3dmark-vantage-score-matching-my-oc.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Low score in Vantage</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/605096-low-score-vantage.html</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:35:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Buddy of mine has an i7 920 currently at 3.5ghz. I've been helping him overclock it but when he runs Vantage at 3.5ghz, his cpu score returns with 21000 on performance. This seems extremely low for a vantage score. So I downclocked my i7 to 3.5 and got a 41000 score to compare. 
 
Checked to make...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Buddy of mine has an i7 920 currently at 3.5ghz. I've been helping him overclock it but when he runs Vantage at 3.5ghz, his cpu score returns with 21000 on performance. This seems extremely low for a vantage score. So I downclocked my i7 to 3.5 and got a 41000 score to compare.<br />
<br />
Checked to make sure his HT was enabled. He is prime95 stable for 30mins and passes linx 20 passes with no errors.<br />
<br />
Any ideas? I'm lost.<br />
<br />
His setup is i7 920 39xxA / Bloodrage GTI / Mushkin Redline</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>ensu3</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/605096-low-score-vantage.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>3D Mark Vantage question</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/604949-3d-mark-vantage-question.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:50:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Why is it when I run my processor at 3.7ghz I get a better overall score than when I run it at 3.8ghz?  3.7ghz i get 11694 and 3.8ghz i get 11563.  My cpu score goes up but my gpu score drops.  This overclock has been stable with 3 hours of prime, a long run of intel burn test, and some folding.  I...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Why is it when I run my processor at 3.7ghz I get a better overall score than when I run it at 3.8ghz?  3.7ghz i get 11694 and 3.8ghz i get 11563.  My cpu score goes up but my gpu score drops.  This overclock has been stable with 3 hours of prime, a long run of intel burn test, and some folding.  I think my system just likes the 3.7 better as I can run much lower voltages at that speed which in turn gives off less heat.<br />
<br />
I would have thought that I would have gotten a better score with that high of an overclock.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>chas1723</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/604949-3d-mark-vantage-question.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Do you know of...</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/604751-do-you-know.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:33:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>My company makes HD Video Multiplex Systems and our new hardware is using 95%+ of the system BUS. Is there any software that can monitor the system BUSs? Like PCI-E, PCI-X, and FSB for bandwidth usage and throughput?  
 
Thanks for your time --Chris</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>My company makes HD Video Multiplex Systems and our new hardware is using 95%+ of the system BUS. Is there any software that can monitor the system BUSs? Like PCI-E, PCI-X, and FSB for bandwidth usage and throughput? <br />
<br />
Thanks for your time --Chris</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>cdnite</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/604751-do-you-know.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Finally Broke the 20k mark in 06 =]]]></title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/604536-finally-broke-20k-mark-06-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=12394607 
 
What do you guys think? I got my I5 to 3.6 and my gtx 260 is sitting at: 
 
Core-730 
Shader-1530 
Memory-1230</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=12394607" target="_blank">http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=12394607</a><br />
<br />
What do you guys think? I got my I5 to 3.6 and my gtx 260 is sitting at:<br />
<br />
Core-730<br />
Shader-1530<br />
Memory-1230</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>CHEFFY!</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/604536-finally-broke-20k-mark-06-a.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PhysX SLI scaling...need more benchmarks</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/604530-physx-sli-scaling-need-more-benchmarks.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:22:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Need more PhysX benchmarks, testing multi gpu mode scaling. 
 
So far I've ran: 
Vantage 
Fluidmark 
Cryostasis 
BM AA 
 
What else is out there?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Need more PhysX benchmarks, testing multi gpu mode scaling.<br />
<br />
So far I've ran:<br />
Vantage<br />
Fluidmark<br />
Cryostasis<br />
BM AA<br />
<br />
What else is out there?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>grunion</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/604530-physx-sli-scaling-need-more-benchmarks.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Direct Compute Benchmark</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/604217-direct-compute-benchmark.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:13:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Somebody had to come up with a direct compute bench sooner or latter. The requirements to run it are to have Dx11 installed and a Dx10/Dx11 compatibe graphics card. 
 
here's the news post (http://brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/11/4/worlds-first-directcompute2c-gpgpu-benchmark-released.aspx) 
 
and...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Somebody had to come up with a direct compute bench sooner or latter. The requirements to run it are to have Dx11 installed and a Dx10/Dx11 compatibe graphics card.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/11/4/worlds-first-directcompute2c-gpgpu-benchmark-released.aspx" target="_blank">here's the news post</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=Files&amp;go=cat&amp;dwn_cat_id=25&amp;go=giveme&amp;dwn_id=937" target="_blank">and download link</a><br />
DirectCompute Benchmark v0.15</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>dragosmp</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/604217-direct-compute-benchmark.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>How do i overclock my 5850 over 775/1125?</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/604074-how-do-i-overclock-my-5850-a.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:40:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>So i installed Afterburner and i could only get my clock speeds up to 775/1125 
 
i am a complete noob at this and have no idea how to cange these settings 
 
and i was reading something about ati flash? what is that 
 
cheers</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>So i installed Afterburner and i could only get my clock speeds up to 775/1125<br />
<br />
i am a complete noob at this and have no idea how to cange these settings<br />
<br />
and i was reading something about ati flash? what is that<br />
<br />
cheers</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>jassinlive</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/604074-how-do-i-overclock-my-5850-a.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>4000 point vantage drop with win7?!?!</title>
			<link>http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/604054-4000-point-vantage-drop-win7.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:55:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>alright so I got windows 7 and decided to benchmark er up! first thing I notice when i get my first scores back is I LOST 4000 points in vantage?!?! ***? 
 
so I did a little analysis and found that EVERYTHING was higher in windows 7 except my physics test where I went from 150.67 to 24.54??? 
 
I...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>alright so I got windows 7 and decided to benchmark er up! first thing I notice when i get my first scores back is I LOST 4000 points in vantage?!?! ***?<br />
<br />
so I did a little analysis and found that EVERYTHING was higher in windows 7 except my physics test where I went from 150.67 to 24.54???<br />
<br />
I have NO idea what happened... thoughts? and NO I have not tried to overclock my processor whatso ever<br />
<br />
my vista score:<br />
<a href="http://service.futuremark.com/resultAnalyzer.action?resultId=1535761&amp;resultType=19" target="_blank">http://service.futuremark.com/result...&amp;resultType=19</a><br />
my windows 7 score:<br />
<a href="http://service.futuremark.com/resultAnalyzer.action?resultId=1568137&amp;resultType=19" target="_blank">http://service.futuremark.com/result...&amp;resultType=19</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/">Benchmarking Software and Discussion</category>
			<dc:creator>dudenell</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.overclock.net/benchmarking-software-discussion/604054-4000-point-vantage-drop-win7.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
