Please don't hijack :)
And yeah, LCDs can get quite nice (Such as |2a|N's monitor), but you can also get crappy ones.
When you buy CRTs you almost always know that the colour will be sweet (Compared to most LCDs)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DaRkLoRd65535
so it turns out im wrong about cost (reasonable time payback) and color range, but does Visual performance, Image flicker, Image brightness, Image geometry, Image sharpness, Screen viewing area, Screen size, Specular screen glare, Electromagnetic emissions, Heat emissions, Space efficiency, not out weight what crt has to offer. I say LCD!
|
All those are minor things. I could agree with Image Flicker though, but upping the HZs is the solution!
I don't even say that LCDs sucks, but I'm just saying that you can get CRTs which normally have better performance than a LCD for way cheaper.
CPU Intel Q6600 B3 |
Motherboard P5K Premium Wifi/AP |
Memory 2x1024 Platinium OCZ DDR2-800 5-5-5-15 |
Graphics Card Gigabyte 8800GT 512MB |
Hard Drive 4xMaxtor mixed 200-250gb's RAID-0 64kb Stripe |
Sound Card Creative XtremeMusic |
Power Supply FSP Group 700w |
Case 3R System Neon Light |
CPU cooling Big Typhoon (lapped) + TriCool + AS5 |
GPU cooling Zalman VF900 |
OS Windows XP Professional |
Monitor Nokia 445PRO (Trinitron 21.4") |