numlock2.0

Hey guys! This is my first FAQ! I hope it is up to the standards of this forum...

So I got a Sony MP3 player, model NW-E507. It's one of the silver editions that uses a relatively new technology (OLED) as the screen. Quick refresh on OLED TechnologyWhen I got it, I read some of the claims on the box:

"Quick Charge: 3 Min Charge = 3 Hr Playback" "Up to 50 hrs battery life." " 1GB 695 songs"

My first impressions were: "yeah right. The iPod shuffle lasts only 16 hours, and it has no screen! This has to be a crazy claim...695 songs? Only if the songs are short and under max compression at 64KB Atrac3plus..."

So now to the point...does the battery life of this Sony really last 50 hours? Cnet tested the NW-E407 (1GB) and it lasted 44.4 hours in the test lab. However, there is no review on the battery life of the NW-E500 series (only apparent difference were the colors and FM tuner) So I just had to test it for myself...

Some key words/terms for settings:
AVLS (Automatic Volume Limiting System) max volume: 16/31
Sound Type: More bass/treble etc.
Power Save: Normal, Ultra, Off
MP3/Radio: Used one, or both.

Test 1: Standard settings

The standard settings I put for the player were: AVLS maximum volume; Sound type: Normal; Power Save Normal; MP3 only

Charge time is ~60 minutes. Must charge through USB :(:(

I left the player on, playing music put the player on "shuffle" and sent it on its way. I kept it in my pocket and checked on it around the 50 hour mark.

Results: Playtime = 58 Hours 49 Minutes

Test 2-7: "Charge in minutes, play for hours"

Same settings as the standard settings; charged by the minute.

Results:


Test 8: Screen Always On

I don't know who would ever leave their screen on, but it's pointless with this MP3 player, besides to know that the player is on. It bothered me a little at night because the screen is bright, so putting it in a drawer solved that problem. The Power Save mode just makes the OLED give off graphical sound waves which don't do anything except to tell you that the player is on. Ultra power save mode just turns the screen off after a few seconds.

MP3 only, same as standard settings.

Results: 23 hours 08 minutes Kinda dissapointing :(. I might redo that test, but probably not.

Test 9: 1/2 MP3, 1/2 Radio
Again, standard settings. I played half MP3 and half radio. It only played MP3's until the 25 hour mark, where I changed it to a local radio station.

Results: 57 hours 39 minutes Not bad, but I expected more.

I'm not done yet, I still have a few more tests to go through...I'll update when I finish the tests.

Test 10: AVLS; MP3; Sound I; Normal Power Save Mode

Results: 55 hours 38 minutes

Test 11: Max Volume (31); MP3; Sound Normal; Power Save Normal

Results: 54 hours 1 minute
Hmm...I expected the volume to have a bigger effect on the battery life...guess not...

Test 12: Volume @ 05; MP3; Sound I; Power Save Normal

Normal conditions I normally listen to at home. Not too bad, volume does not have a huge impact at all.

Results: 59 hours 10 minutes

Test 13: AVLS; Radio; No sound settings; Power Save Ultra <- this should result in higher battery life

Results: 25 hours 2 Minutes
2nd Test: 24 hours 22 minutes I don't listen to radio for a whole day straight anyway...

***??? It should definitely get battery life than this! I might retest this a few times. Maybe the FM tuner used more battery life than I thought...

Test 14: AVLS; MP3; Sound Setting 2 (Max bass); Power Save Normal
Results: 52 Hours 15 Minutes

For my last test, I decided to see the effect of battery life with just the screen. So I switched the screen mode to clock and put power save off. This way, it's basically a pocket watch :) I'll see how it goes...

Test 15: ? Can't use it as a clock, it would last forever!

Bottom Line: Yes, Sony's claim on battery life is correct, at least on the NW-E4xx and NW-E5XX flash based series as of yet. Just don't leave the screen on all day.

edit: Someone has asked me about the price of this MP3 player, but seeing as it is outdated now, it's harder to find. I looked on froogle and they go for around $65-$100. For that price, some of the newer Sony's may be a better choice now. Though they definitely go for cheaper than that on ebay...take a look and you may get a good deal

Attached Thumbnails

       

numlock2.0

Just to say one thing. It takes a while to do these tests. I estimate 12 more days before I complete all the tests.

I really hope this lives up to the standards of the OC forum

EDIT: huh? Why is it in opinion? Oh well

__________________
Check out my Sony Battery Life FAQ!!! NY Overclockers Thread! Heatware
Current OC(s): Core 2 e4400 @ 3.400 Ghz (70.0% OC) Athlon XP 2400+ @ 2.165 Ghz (8.25% OC) Athlon XP 1800+ @ 2.128 Ghz (38.8% OC)
Think you've got a good AGP system? See the Top 25 AGP Systems @ OCN!
Team Victorious Secret

numlock2.0

Update: Test 10 completed. Moved sections. Pictures added.

Please criticize and critique my FAQ. Improvements?

Jazino

looks like a lot of work, im not looking at getting one but this should help anyone who is, good job.

gravity

am I supposed to be impressed by this ? because I am...
50 hrs playback time wow that's quite something my iPod Video barely reaches the 10hr mark !
Good faq though, seem you didn't waste time for nothing... I never believe what big corporations say :p
Anyway very well done faq, very clear and understandable !

__________________

numlock2.0

Thanks guys! :) Just corrected some stupid grammatical errors. I'm currently charging the MP3 player for my next test ;)

jigglylizard

I have this Mp3 player. It actually lasts about 50 hours. That's a LOT of music. I listen to it 6-8 hours a day and only charge it once per week

numlock2.0

yeah, (just about) the same here. I did that for about the first 8 months that I had it. But I just HAD to see if the player would actually last that long.

However, it does not take into account the user switching tracks, changing volume, playing with the bubble animation, etc...I'm not sure how I would test that...

gravity

i think for switching tracks, mp3 players which memory have no movable parts it shouldn't (logically) affect the playback time, altough for ipods with hdd, it really does affect ! I could go for 15 hrs of playback(even more i think since i made a jakarta-singapore-paris with those earphones plugged in my ears nearly non-stop)(about 18hrs) with my ipod when I left it playing a loop of 3 songs, but when i constantly change the songs it only lasts 7 to 8 hrs...

__________________

numlock2.0

yeah, but changing the tracks requires the screen to turn on. That might affect the play time by...a few minutes I guess...