Are waterblocks worth it? - Page 2 - Overclock.net

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #11 of 13 Old 11-03-2013, 05:26 PM
WaterCooler
 
KaiserFrederick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 726
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Juub View Post

This is my biggest question about water cooling. Some cards will hit their natural limits way before hitting their maximal stable temps. Water cooling doesn't help in any way in those situations right?

Edit: Let's take a concrete example. How much more more OC headroom would a reference EVGA GTX 780 with a waterblock have over the same model on air? Would the price difference of the waterblock make it smarter to instead purchase a better version such as the Classified?
GK110 has a lot of OC headroom, so in this case going with water cooling would allow you do do things like flashing a custom BIOS and really upping the voltage. In theory, you could probably go from around 1100 on air to 1300 on water, depending on how hard you are willing to push your chip. Going with a Classy would be very beneficial in this situation, the chips are capable of 1400+ on the core but on air they tend to reach their thermal limitations before their silicon ones.

DEW21689: So its agreed then? We all invest in our own private island community powered by solar panels, wind turbines, and water turbines and pitch in for the fibre optic runs?
Overclock.Republic? =P There won't be any racial prejudice etc... Just a concern of AMD/Intel/Nvidia fan boys killing each other =Ppost-flame-small.gif [Official] AMD R9 290 Owners Club post-flame-small.gif
KaiserFrederick is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #12 of 13 Old 11-04-2013, 06:51 AM
WaterCooler
 
Levesque's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 2,116
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 125
I have only one thing to say. When you go water, there is no coming back. smile.gif

On the internet, for 10 REALLY VOCAL whiners, you have 1000 satisifed customers that don't post.



Mountain Mods build and my Home Theater link: http://www.overclock.net/t/1232605/2-mountain-mods-build-home-theater-gaming-room#post_16777582

gunner2.gifAsus ROG Rampage IV Extreme X79 Owners Clubgunner.gif
Levesque is offline  
post #13 of 13 Old 11-04-2013, 07:21 AM
733mhz
 
qbical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 499
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 20
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaiserFrederick View Post

In terms of performance, all water cooling does is pretty much negate the temperature limit, so you can set the voltage as high as you like without having to worry about your chips melting or thermal throttling. However, in my case, my 3570k is a very bad overclocker, it takes 1.24V to get to just 4.2 GHz rolleyes.gif
So in my case, watercooling doesn't really let me OC any higher, as I reach my chips's natural/silicon limitations before I reach its thermal ones.

exactly this. I started w/c my GPU and never looked back after the first one. Then I got a card where I got almost better OC's with the stock cooler than I did with it on water. Still, it was worth it to me to start w/c my GPU's. It always gave me a nice performance bump. Plus, I always had a better CPU then GPU so that helped

"Instead of shooting at where I was, you should have shot at where I was going to be"
qbical is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off