[Geeks3D/4Gamers.net] nVidia 2011 Roadmap: GF110 768 shaders, GF112 384 shaders etc - Overclock.net

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 97 Old 10-18-2010, 06:10 AM - Thread Starter
4.0ghz
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,905
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 211
Quote:
Three new GPUs for the 6 first months of 2011: GF110 (768 cores, 512-bit memory bus width) to replace the current GTX 470/480, GF112 (384 cores, 320-bit memory bus width) to update the current GTX 460 and GF119 (96 cores, 64-bit memory bus width) to refresh GT 430 type cards.
Source

Could the GF110 be the rumored GTX 580?
PanicProne is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 97 Old 10-18-2010, 06:13 AM
Greetings, my fellow Space Warriors!
 
Razi3l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,777
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 365
768 cores?.. lolwut?.. This will either be a dual GPU.. or a card that will consume crazy amounts of power.. Want to see more. 768/2 = 384 = Full GF104. 512/2=256. I'm guessing this will be the GTX 495 everyone is looking for, so basically 2x (full) GTX 460s. Iz i genius? Either this or a single GPU.. but it makes more sense to be a dual GPU card imo.
Razi3l is offline  
post #3 of 97 Old 10-18-2010, 06:16 AM
4387 point(s) total
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 65,131
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 4426
http://www.4gamer.net/games/099/G009...creenshot.html



I don't understand the GF112's positioning.... unless the GF110 is some how a dual GF112? However, NVIDIA does not give different GPU codenames to dual GPU cards.

Who can read Chinese? What does it say next to the GF110?

To answer most of your questions: (1) a fridge cannot cool a PC (2) 64-bit OS for over 3.4GB (3) If a PCIe card fits, it should work (4) Resolution, not screen size (5) Report, not respond to Spam (6) Single-Rail/Non-Modular PSUs are not always better than Multi-Rail/Modular (7) Sequential does not matter as much as random for OS drives (8) Requirements come before hardware for servers

DuckieHo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 97 Old 10-18-2010, 06:16 AM
slow TSMC = more telescopes
 
Alatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 16,905
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razi3l View Post
768 cores?.. lolwut?.. This will either be a dual-GPU.. or a card that will consume crazy amounts of power.. Want to see more. 768/2 = 384 = Full GF104. 512/2=256. I'm guessing this will be the GTX 495 everyone is looking for, so basically 2x (full) GTX 460s. Iz i genius? XD
must be a dual GPU there's no way they can fit that kind of amount of cores to a single die using the current 40nm process.

Chimp Challenge 2 x Participant  15 Million+ Folding at Home points 

Alatar is offline  
post #5 of 97 Old 10-18-2010, 06:17 AM - Thread Starter
4.0ghz
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,905
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razi3l View Post
768 cores?.. lolwut?.. This will either be a dual GPU.. or a card that will consume crazy amounts of power.. Want to see more. 768/2 = 384 = Full GF104. 512/2=256. I'm guessing this will be the GTX 495 everyone is looking for, so basically 2x (full) GTX 460s. Iz i genius? Either this or a single GPU.. but it makes more sense to be a dual GPU card imo.
If it were a dual GTX 460, it wouldn't have 512 bit bus.

But we don't know, if could be anything as of now.
PanicProne is offline  
post #6 of 97 Old 10-18-2010, 06:19 AM - Thread Starter
4.0ghz
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,905
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 211
Also, if it is a dual gtx 460 indeed, then AMD has a real chance to wear the performance crown again, with this new GPU battle round.

The coming 6990 dual GPU will probably be a monster of epic performance.
PanicProne is offline  
post #7 of 97 Old 10-18-2010, 06:20 AM
Greetings, my fellow Space Warriors!
 
Razi3l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,777
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 365
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alatar View Post
must be a dual GPU there's no way they can fit that kind of amount of cores to a single die using the current 40nm process.
Pretty much what i thought. I think it probably will end up as a dual GPU.. with the GF112 being the GTX "475".. using the GF104 with all 384 shaders. So i guess we can expect this GF110 card to perform somewhere around that of GTX 470 SLI?.. possible between 460 and 470 SLI?.. That's pretty nice but how will it compare to Antilles is the question.. I'm guessing it will probably be slower.. since 470 SLI compare to 5870 CF pretty much, and even if this thing was ~5%-10% faster in SLI, Antilles should still be a good 25% faster, at least.. most likely a lot more, but this is just a guess from the performance jump from Juniper to Barts.. Exciting times up ahead. While NVIDIA is doing well, AMD is 1 step ahead and i think by the time NVIDIA pulls out this, most likely around may.. AMD will be working on their next gen XD
Razi3l is offline  
post #8 of 97 Old 10-18-2010, 06:26 AM
3.5ghz
 
shaolin95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 809
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razi3l View Post
Pretty much what i thought. I think it probably will end up as a dual GPU.. with the GF112 being the GTX "475".. using the GF104 with all 384 shaders. So i guess we can expect this GF110 card to perform somewhere around that of GTX 470 SLI?.. possible between 460 and 470 SLI?.. That's pretty nice but how will it compare to Antilles is the question.. I'm guessing it will probably be slower.. since 470 SLI compare to 5870 CF pretty much, and even if this thing was ~5%-10% faster in SLI, Antilles should still be a good 25% faster, at least.. most likely a lot more, but this is just a guess from the performance jump from Juniper to Barts.. Exciting times up ahead
I love reading performance comparison of non existent cards based on good old fashing fanboysm

Mario Lemieux is GOD!
Sid the Kid rocks too!
Go PENS!
Aguante Boca!
Visca el Barca!
Aš tikrai myliu Lietuva!
shaolin95 is offline  
post #9 of 97 Old 10-18-2010, 06:28 AM
slow TSMC = more telescopes
 
Alatar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 16,905
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 249
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaolin95 View Post
I love reading performance comparison of non existent cards based on good old fashing fanboysm
what's wrong with some speculation?

Chimp Challenge 2 x Participant  15 Million+ Folding at Home points 

Alatar is offline  
post #10 of 97 Old 10-18-2010, 06:31 AM
Greetings, my fellow Space Warriors!
 
Razi3l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5,777
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 365
Quote:
Originally Posted by shaolin95 View Post
I love reading performance comparison of non existent cards based on good old fashing fanboysm
I was just assuming and guessing (like i mentioned) from the vantage results of the HD 6870 barts. This dual GPU can't be much faster than 460/470 SLI.. calm your horses. It's a sensible guess.. im not saying something silly like 6870 crossfire > GTX 480 Tri-SLI :\\
Razi3l is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off