Thoughts about this ram kit - Page 4 - Overclock.net

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #31 of 33 Old 11-25-2013, 11:25 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
sumitlian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: India
Posts: 3,213
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam OCX View Post

If module is obviously single-sided (one side of PCB is blank, as you say) then there is no reason to remove the heatspreaders - it's "dangerous" (you can pull them off with ICs ending up in a dead module) and you won't see anything new.

From now, I will never try to remove it biggrin.gif

sumitlian is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 33 Old 11-26-2013, 08:27 PM - Thread Starter
New to Overclock.net
 
szeged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tallahasse FL
Posts: 17,305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 763


16gb 2400mhz cas 9 thumb.gif
szeged is offline  
post #33 of 33 Old 11-26-2013, 08:33 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
sumitlian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: India
Posts: 3,213
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by szeged View Post



16gb 2400mhz cas 9 thumb.gif

This is even better ! thumb.gif

I hope its dual sided, because my single sided tridentx are 10-15% slower than my previous dual sided RAMs at any certain timing and frequency. Seems like high density ICs have more overhead than lower ones.

sumitlian is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off