[3dcenter] Specifications for AMD's first graphics chip Hawaii - Overclock.net

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 348 Old 09-19-2013, 12:48 AM - Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chernarus
Posts: 1,051
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 78


SOURCE

Sorry if this has already been posted.

Moustache is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 348 Old 09-19-2013, 12:49 AM
News Fiend
 
Newbie2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 7,909
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 296
They are guesstimates, not official.

.
Newbie2009 is offline  
post #3 of 348 Old 09-19-2013, 12:50 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
szeged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tallahasse FL
Posts: 17,305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 763
just curious, what language is the source in? didnt go to the site, but noticed the url at the bottom is in a diff language.
szeged is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 348 Old 09-19-2013, 12:51 AM - Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Chernarus
Posts: 1,051
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 78
Quote:
Originally Posted by szeged View Post

just curious, what language is the source in? didnt go to the site, but noticed the url at the bottom is in a diff language.
It's German.

Moustache is offline  
post #5 of 348 Old 09-19-2013, 12:52 AM
 
Star Forge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 674
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 19
Faster than a Titan with a 25% reduced die than a GK110 at the same nm? That is really questionable...
Star Forge is offline  
post #6 of 348 Old 09-19-2013, 12:54 AM
4.0 GHz
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,561
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 493
kpo6969 is offline  
post #7 of 348 Old 09-19-2013, 01:01 AM
4.0 GHz
 
Bit_reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Finland
Posts: 6,225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Star Forge View Post

Faster than a Titan with a 25% reduced die than a GK110 at the same nm? That is really questionable...

Its not unheard of. Die size isn't everything. The GK110 die is massive. Some would say too big. Its only natural for AMD to use a smaller size. Besides this is just a guesstimate and even that only puts it a little bit ahead of an TITAN.

The XFX 4890 post 2 year reference cooler fan bearing service
NZXT Tempest Community
[Worklog] NZXT Tempest eats a 360 rad (hopefully)
Quote:
Originally Posted by adjas go_quote.gif

you under-estimate the power of e-peen, you'll whither and waiver to it's power, and finally succumb.
Bow to e-peen and buy.
Bit_reaper is offline  
post #8 of 348 Old 09-19-2013, 01:02 AM
 
Forceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 10,855
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 792
It's not a GTX Titanium, so if they can't even get that right why would be we believe anything else? And it clearly says "Assumption 1" and "Assumption 2". More butt-pulled rumors.

Forceman's Law: Any AMD/Nvidia GPU thread, no matter what the topic, will eventually include a post referencing the GTX 970.
Forceman is offline  
post #9 of 348 Old 09-19-2013, 01:06 AM
Overclocker
 
Tonza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 579
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 18
Faster than GTX Titan, sounds legit.

| Threadripper 1950X @ 4.1Ghz / Enermax Liqtech 360 TR4 | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme | 32GB G.Skill Trident Z RGB 3200mhz CL14 | Geforce GTX 1080Ti FE @ 2100mhz / Alphacool Eiswolf GPX PRO /w 2x Corsair ML120| 1TB 850 PRO + 1TB 850 EVO | Xonar Essence STU + 2x Genelec G Two + Genelec 5050A | Phanteks Enthoo Evolv + EVGA Supernova G3 850W | Samsung S34E790C (34" 3440x1440 Curved Ultrawide)|
Tonza is offline  
post #10 of 348 Old 09-19-2013, 01:06 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
szeged's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Tallahasse FL
Posts: 17,305
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Liked: 763
Quote:
Originally Posted by Forceman View Post

It's not a GTX Titanium, so if they can't even get that right why would be we believe anything else? And it clearly says "Assumption 1" and "Assumption 2". More butt-pulled rumors.

different language, cant get everything right in translation.

not that im saying theyre right, i doubt itll get close to a titan(ium)
szeged is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off