[Digitimes] Intel, AMD new CPU platforms target January 2017 launch - Page 5 - Overclock.net

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #41 of 169 Old 06-07-2016, 01:33 PM
Audiophile
 
DunePilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by inedenimadam View Post

I am not doing another build this year. No big die GPUs, no zen, underwhelming x99 refesh...

2017 looks like it is going to be a good year to build though.

No doubt... 1080Ti or Titan X80, 3D XPoint among other things. No idea what I'm going to do CPU wise. I have an X99 board and some DDR4 sitting here in a box but with the $1750 pricetag on that 6950X I might end up going with something else. I will be waiting on the GPUs before I make a decision anyways.

Fire Strike - Overall 17259 Graphics 21346 http://www.3dmark.com/fs/6044454 on LGA 1366 x58 Motherboard
DunePilot is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #42 of 169 Old 06-07-2016, 01:37 PM
 
Waitng4realGPU's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 986
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by chir View Post

Oh look! An AMD delay after ludicrous claims about performance vs. Intel. Reminds me of the Bulldozer launch.. Was intending to wait for this for my next computer. Nah, getting a 6500K instead.

If you need a PC now you build with the best available with your dollar, pretty simple concept.

People waiting for things will always be disappointed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlailScHLAMP View Post

Un-sourced op-ed

the digitimes thing is pure speculation. no source..

Click bait.

Are we surprised by yet another click bait article being taken as fact on OCN? smile.gif
Waitng4realGPU is offline  
post #43 of 169 Old 06-07-2016, 01:39 PM
 
Robenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,287
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 192
Can we get this article moved to rumors as there is no source?
Robenger is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #44 of 169 Old 06-07-2016, 01:40 PM - Thread Starter
 
iLeakStuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,685
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robenger View Post

Can we get this article moved to rumors as there is no source?

It is in the rumor section
iLeakStuff is offline  
post #45 of 169 Old 06-07-2016, 01:44 PM
 
Robenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,287
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 192
Quote:
Originally Posted by iLeakStuff View Post

It is in the rumor section

K, can we now move it to the iLeakStuff because I hate AMD subfolder?
Robenger is offline  
post #46 of 169 Old 06-07-2016, 01:47 PM
 
Waitng4realGPU's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 986
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robenger View Post

K, can we now move it to the iLeakStuff because I hate AMD subfolder?

laugher.gif
Waitng4realGPU is offline  
post #47 of 169 Old 06-07-2016, 01:48 PM
New to Overclock.net
 
ZealotKi11er's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Toronto, CA
Posts: 44,143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked: 1787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waitng4realGPU View Post

If you need a PC now you build with the best available with your dollar, pretty simple concept.

People waiting for things will always be disappointed.
Are we surprised by yet another click bait article being taken as fact on OCN? smile.gif

For CPU its better to wait. CPUs these days last 3-4 years no problem.

CPU History (Click to show)
CPU -> Sempron 2400+, Athlon 64 3700+, Core 2 Q6600, A8-3870K, Core 2 Q9550, Core 2 QX9770, Core i7 920, Core i5 2500K, Core i5 3570K, Phenom II X4 955, Core i7 3770K.
GPU History (Click to show)
FX 5200 128MB, 9800 Pro 128MB, 6800GS 256MB, 7600GT 256MB, HD 4850 512MB, HD 4870 1GB, 2x HD 4870 1GB, GTX280 1GB, HD 5850 1GB, GTX470 1.25GB, GTX580 1.5GB, HD 6950 2GB, HD 6950 2GB + HD 6970 2GB, HD 6990 2GB, HD 7970 3GB, 2 x HD 7970 3GB,R9 290 4GB, R9 290X 4GB, R9 Fury X 4GB, GTX 1080 8GB, GTX1080 Ti 11GB
MB History (Click to show)
ECS KN1 Extreme -> ASUS P5Q-E -> GIGABYTE GA-X58A-UD7 -> GIGABYTE GA-Z68XP-UD4 -> GIGABYTE GA-Z77X-UD5H -> ASRock Z77E-ITX

Chimp Challenge Participant  Overclock.net 10 Year Member 

ZealotKi11er is offline  
post #48 of 169 Old 06-07-2016, 01:50 PM
733mhz
 
serothis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,232
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 61
Quote:
Originally Posted by Code-Red View Post


I can't support Intel anymore on a moral basis, as a consumer. Supporting Intel any further is a vote to continue this stagnant, overpriced market. Even if AMD isn't fully competitive with Skylake/Broadwell-E/Kaby performance wise, I'm still hoping they are price wise.

Zen or nothing for the foreseeable future.

Don't get your hopes up.

In the GPU market AMD has followed Nvidia's pricing structure and let's not for get the FX-9590's $900 launch price.

If an 8 core Zen chip competes with the 6900K, expect a $1,000 price tag

Quote:
Originally Posted by zodac go_quote.gif
My rig isn't a wannabe! sozo.gif
serothis is offline  
post #49 of 169 Old 06-07-2016, 01:51 PM
PC Gamer
 
ivymaxwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 217
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 7
makes sense since no am4 or kaby lake boards shown at computex except one msi and one am4 super alpha versions.

JF-AMD saying AMD can build you a computer that beats Intel, but you can't afford it. Is as to say I can build you a steam engine faster than a gasoline car but you can't afford it.
ivymaxwell is offline  
post #50 of 169 Old 06-07-2016, 01:51 PM
 
Waitng4realGPU's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 986
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 66
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZealotKi11er View Post

For CPU its better to wait. CPUs these days last 3-4 years no problem.

Yeah I've had my ivy bridge for years, not needing to upgrade it for a while yet it seems.

But if you really need a pc and don't have a decent one just go buy an intel and be done with it I think.
Quote:
Originally Posted by serothis View Post

Don't get your hopes up.

In the GPU market AMD has followed Nvidia's pricing structure and let's not for get the FX-9590's $900 launch price.

If an 8 core Zen chip competes with the 6900K, expect a $1,000 price tag

For most gamers etc I think the X6 with HT will be the most attractive chip, should be reasonably priced I'd assume going on AMD's history.
Waitng4realGPU is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off