[PW] Microsoft Warns The End Is Near For Windows XP. - Page 7 - Overclock.net

Forum Jump: 
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #61 of 102 Old 04-10-2013, 07:08 AM
4.4Ghz for Netflix
 
Brutuz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ballarat, Australia
Posts: 17,190
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 564
Quote:
Originally Posted by wolfeking View Post

yes. I still use it. It is not due to hardware for the most part either. It is due to having a 40GB HDD, and 20GB of MP3's to store on it. Windows 7/8 won't fit the space left, but XP will. Linux is always an option, but why change when the current setup works?

You have a 1TB HDD according to your sig rig?
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010rig View Post

Oh you, and your Vista. lachen.gif

A lot of "us" are on Windows 7. wink.gif

XP users are moving to Windows 8 mainly.


Web-based statistics are never that accurate, they always vary widely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sepiashimmer View Post

I miss Windows 98 SE, brings back memories. Why does Microsoft come with stupid things like these they should just keep releasing updates and Direct X 11 for XP. What need was there for Vista and 7?

...The major rewrite of the NT kernel? That was very much needed? The ability to actually use a quad core? (XPs scaling is utter crap compared to Vista and 7s last I heard)


Foldathon Folder - 2011 Participant  Chimp Challenge 2 x Participant  2 Million+ Folding at Home points 

Brutuz is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #62 of 102 Old 04-10-2013, 09:34 AM
 
MoGTy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010rig View Post

Oh you, and your Vista. lachen.gif

A lot of "us" are on Windows 7. wink.gif

XP users are moving to Windows 8 mainly.


Assuming that there's no shifting between Vista - 7 - 8 at all. Yes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 47 Knucklehead View Post

If Microsoft did that, even though I am very anti-piracy, I would have no problems with doing and helping people circumvent the Windows authentication procedure for XP (which is easy). Just shutting off authentication servers for a product that you bought and that the ELUA that you agreed to did not specifically say had an end of use date, it just flat out wrong and I would be all in favor of a customer circumventing that and suing the ever loving hell out of Microsoft.

I never read the EULA, I'm almost sure that something is in there though. These things are written with a bunch of experts, lawyers etc by their side, I'd be surprised if it didn't include some sort of description that could be referred to as being an end date.

English isn't my mother tongue, excuse my phrasing.

Chimp Challenge Participant 

MoGTy is offline  
post #63 of 102 Old 04-10-2013, 09:52 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
adamkatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,546
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 47
It'll die but not without a cigar and 2 1911's

adamkatt is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #64 of 102 Old 04-10-2013, 10:36 AM
Politically Incorrect
 
Liranan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Soviet China... Oh wait..
Posts: 8,480
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blameless View Post

In my experience, the practical difference between XP x64 and even Windows 8 is pretty minimal when it comes to multi-core performance, even with hyperthreaded hex core parts. It's measurable in some tasks, but almost never actually perceptible.

I haven't used XP since Vista SP1 and I absolutely hated XP SP3, it caused so many problems and incompatibilities for me so I can't really remember that well. I do remember that when I went from XP to Vista running my Q6600 I saw a boost in performance when it came to the CPU because XP wasn't able to schedule tasks correctly at that time.

Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by faraz1729 go_quote.gif
Haha, Liranan, you creep.

Tacitus - The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws

Only when the last tree has died and the last river been poisoned and the last fish been caught will we realise we cannot eat money. - Cree Indian Proverb
Liranan is online now  
post #65 of 102 Old 04-10-2013, 11:58 AM
New to Overclock.net
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 6,632
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 485
Wow, I don't recall XP being that bad with quad cores. I can imagine that it might not handle quad+ht, hex, or octocores that well.

AMD needs to publish a Business Manual called "How Not to Launch a Product: Learn from our Mistakes and Succeed!".
AMD probably wont tho, because that would be a guaranteed money maker.

PassMark System Score: Passmark Rating 5,710, CPU Mark 19,985
CPU-Z Validation: LINK AIDA64: LINK
Cinebench15: LINK Geekbench3 scores: LINK Geekbench4.1 scores: LINK
UserBenchmarks: CPU: 105.5%, GPU: 111.7% MEM: 127.9%
BinaryDemon is offline  
post #66 of 102 Old 04-10-2013, 01:32 PM
Case Modder
 
47 Knucklehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 12,730
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 592
Quote:
Originally Posted by BinaryDemon View Post

Wow, I don't recall XP being that bad with quad cores. I can imagine that it might not handle quad+ht, hex, or octocores that well.

It isn't. I enjoyed using it on Q6600 and Q6700's.


Chimp Challenge 2 x Participant  75 Million+ Folding at Home points  Foldathon Folder - 2012 Participant  Intel Expert Panel 

47 Knucklehead is offline  
post #67 of 102 Old 04-10-2013, 01:38 PM
Overclocker in Training
 
b3machi7ke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,710
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 128
Quote:
Originally Posted by BinaryDemon View Post

Wow, I don't recall XP being that bad with quad cores. I can imagine that it might not handle quad+ht, hex, or octocores that well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 47 Knucklehead View Post

It isn't. I enjoyed using it on Q6600 and Q6700's.

+2 to this guy. didn't notice a difference going from XP to 7 with my 920 and 950. I mean, I wasn't benchmarking anything competitively, but for day to day tasks, gaming, and F@H and BOINC, I didn't see any differences

My BOINC Stats || Come Join Us and Get Into Shape!! thumb.gif || Join the Gun Club thumb.gif
-Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety-
-A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed-
I know English isn't everyone's primary language, so when I correct you understand I'm not doing it to be rude or mean, I'm trying to help. I apologize to anyone who might think I am trying to be rude or mean, please don't take it that way. On the other side, if you see a mistake in my post, feel free to PM me and I'll be more than happy to go back and correct the error smile.gif

BOINC Pentathlon Participant  

b3machi7ke is offline  
post #68 of 102 Old 04-10-2013, 01:55 PM
WaterCooler
 
Vagrant Storm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, MN
Posts: 11,169
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 415
Yeah...XP handled multiple cores pretty well. I've never tested it really on more than four threads though(I've installed it but I've only ran single threaded applications on the installation). In fact, getting my first dual core CPU was what made my clenched fists finally let go of Windows 2000. To this day I run XP in classic theme so I can at least pretend it is Windows 2000.

If I am running XP on a system...I probably not too concerned about the security of it anyway. Though a lot of businesses are looking at massive bills to upgrade off of XP...I've seen some applications that need Windows NT and SQL Server 1997 in order to operate, but would cost millions to replace and since they still do the job so they run them yet.

MINNESOTA OVERCLOCKERS | The Climate Phenomenon
If it ain't broke...MAKE IT GO FASTER!!!devil.gif
Vagrant Storm is offline  
post #69 of 102 Old 04-10-2013, 01:58 PM
 
MoGTy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,321
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 41
It ran Quad cores as well as it was meant to run them. Considering that it was never built with quad in mind. Heck it would be 4 years before dual cores appeared and even longer until quads.

English isn't my mother tongue, excuse my phrasing.

Chimp Challenge Participant 

MoGTy is offline  
post #70 of 102 Old 04-10-2013, 01:59 PM
Audiophile
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Wallachia
Posts: 1,829
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked: 107
Practically this is an announcement from Microsoft that they need money NOW smile.gif
We all knew the XP support is ending in 2014.

Most of the people that use XP will continue using it if they find it better suited for the hardware they use.
Also most of the people don t care about security updates ,patches and so on ,some users don t even install SP3 .
Most probable 20% of the machines will continue to use XP next year no matter what Microsoft is saying or doing.
XP will end when users will end it.

I will personally continue to use XP to play some games properly also ,even if i may keep it off line.
To bad they made such a good operating system.

What about FM2 motherboards with 2 APU sockets and GDDR5 on-board AMD ?! smile.gif

Maybe i am to sarcastic sometimes smile.gif
Dromihetes is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page


Forum Jump: 

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off