New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by s-x

If you read all the updates its pretty clear that they stole it. The only question is if and when is he going to take them to court over it.
Really? Did you watch this video? There is a lot of scripted questions and answers that make this a PR event more than a real Q&A.Intel guy: we feel that we made so many changes including a revised TIM that it needed its own codenamelinus: now heres a hard hitting question, why was the tim previously so bad?Intel guy: it was too expensive every company cuts corners and didnt work with our innovative manufacturing but this new version is much better and made just for you guys
People are over hyping this. If it was something brand new they wouldnt be revealing it with a twitter picture of the box. They would run a much bigger PR event. Its going to be a new box/rehash/higher clock/whatever.
Pretty sure this is the result of intels 'old' rebate program with manufacturers.
They typically dont do as well in the mobile space because nobody wants to pay money for a game that is made by some guy in their basement without trying it first. If they released the mario series on mobile, it would be a huge hit just because people would buy it due to the mario name. Obviously a lot of games are hard to play on a touchscreen, but classic side scrolling mario would work, and its not like they cant use the mario name to create games like dr.mario for...
Did anyone even bother to read the article?This makes very little sense. Samsung has a lot more money than intel does, they have plenty of their own factories and R&D to produce the screens, and its not like samsung is a new player in this field.The ONLY reason why intel would make such an investment is because they want people to adopt 4k, and start making old laptops and igp's (even on desktops) a thing of the past. This is intel saying 'consumers no longer desire new...
The only issue i see is AMD isnt very good at marketing things. This isnt something out of this world, it was expected and performs decently, the big question is how partners integrate the chip into laptops, if they slap them on cheapo laptops, nobody will want them. If they do as the author said and use the cost savings to implement an SSD, or better screen then these will do fine. AMD should stop hyping things and make announcements that show the average consumer the...
The problem is AMD cannot just work with a developer thats using gameworks and get fair treatment. Developers have deadlines they have to meet, and when they are partnered ($$) with Nvidia, the last thing they are going to do is take extra time to implement code to further optimize the game for their partners rival. Nvidia's optimizations will be implemented first, and get full support, while AMD will be lucky to get partial implementation.This happens the opposite way...
You arent spending 10k to match its cuda cores. You are paying 10k to have nvidia support you. Please name these reputable businesses that are buying up all the stock that everyone keeps using as a defense. You cant, because they dont exist. No big company would be turning in quadro's for the titan-z, it would be a nightmare to get support for them and you would have no ECC memory. 10k is a drop in the bucket when it comes to having 6 figure salaried developers sitting...
And I just spoke to Jen-Hsun Huang and all 5 titan z's are going to the development of the next flappy bird. Im sure these major companies that are buying them wont mind the week long RMA process, the consumer 'support', and no ECC.
New Posts  All Forums: