New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by james8

imo TITAN only really shines when you play VRAM heavy games at triple monitor resolutions, such as 4800x2560 like CallSignVega here does. otherwise the GTX 690 is superior.
seems heavily AMD biased given how the 7970 GHz leads the TITAN, a much superior card.
wasn't the announced theoretical max for GDDR5 is 7 GHz? wow great manufacturing job Nvidia!
^dang that must've smell terrible. I agree with Sentinel in that you should contact the MFG of that controller and ask for compensation. wouldn't hurt to try. who knows you may be getting another "brand new" system
everything max without any form of intensive hardware antialiasing (such as MSAA, SSAA, CSAA, etc) resolution should be your native since it's your computer. fps average should be 60 with 45 minimum. no hitches, lag, freezes, stuttering,...
definitely no deferred antialiasing and you may have to reduce ambient occlusion in some areas
Quote:Originally Posted by vampirr i7 3770k in total has 14Ghz of raw performance and PlayStation 4 will have 12.8 to 16Ghz depending if its clocked at 1.6 or 2.0Ghz, developers will use all 8 cores and we already saw that FX 8350...
Realtek =/= good sound
^that's because the ignorant general public cannot discern any digit after the leading one. Samsung Galaxy S5 will have 4 GB RAM to feed Android
Quote:Originally Posted by BinaryDemon An amusing experiment but I think it's flawed because: A 'game development simulator' - seriously who would pay for that?you, sir, sounds like a pirate.
New Posts  All Forums: