Quote:Originally Posted by bao28 Quote:Originally Posted by dixson01974 On average 8320 oc around 4.5-4.8ghz and the 8350 around 4.8-5.0ghz+.
really? I was planning to get a 8320 too, I remember the fx 8120's seem to have the...
So with Bulldozer it was figured out that higher VIDs generally meant you had a chip that was a lot less leaky and therefore clocked alot better on air and water because you didn't run into the massive wall of heat so fast. Has anyone...
If I'm understanding this correctly, this isn't actually a GPU. This is an x86 cpu with a ton of cores making it massively parallel that uses the PCIE interface.
AM3+ isn't ever going to have PCI3 or native USB3. It's an extremely dated platform that's only still around for the sake of compatibility and the fact AMD don't want to invest in a new chipset. The PCIE controller is still on the mobo...
Quote:Originally Posted by aeassa It's really funny to see people who don't own shares in companies constantly bash firms that are making profits and delivering value to their shareholders.
I'm an Nvidia shareholder. I'm really...
Quote:Originally Posted by Dimaggio1103 Title should read "Nvidia posts record revenue on strength of suckers wallets".
Do you not recall the 680 being $50 cheaper than any 7970 at the time of it's release? The 12.11 driver didn't...
Quote:Originally Posted by Junkboy Quote:Originally Posted by Tslm The 680 puts out less heat, Nvidia just put in a fan profile that favoured extremely low noise. You can't hear a reference 680 fan until 80c, the 7970 is...
Quote:Originally Posted by Usario Quote:Originally Posted by Tslm Quote:Originally Posted by Usario The HD 7970 is 20% faster per clock than the GTX 680 and runs cooler. Power consumption is in Nvidia's favor however.
The...
Quote:Originally Posted by Usario The HD 7970 is 20% faster per clock than the GTX 680 and runs cooler. Power consumption is in Nvidia's favor however.
The 680 puts out less heat, Nvidia just put in a fan profile that favoured...