Posts by ramicio

Higher frame rate should still make input response quicker even if the screen can't display the higher frame rate.

I don't know if any of this stuff is a good deal, but I was looking at them a while back. http://www.starcase.com/rack_rail_online_store.htm

The T7900 has crossovers on all 7 channels that sends bass to its sub. It doesn't matter how small its satellite speakers are...it has a sub and has crossovers.

What? Do I really have to break it down? His speaker set has its own crossovers from all 7 channels to redirect bass. Doing so in software will be redundant and also at the improper point for the speakers' responses. Being small...

I would still set it to full range. That set of speakers has crossovers inside of the sub/amp unit. They know what frequencies are appropriate to route where, Windows does not as it's blind to what's plugged into it. It doesn't matter...

Quote:Originally Posted by Falcy No. Why? Because 2.1 speaker sets 99.9% of the time have their own crossover. The 0.01% of the time could be some kind of set that includes a 3rd input that is only for the sub. A 5.1 or 7.1 analog...

Uhh, I believe Windows does have a high-pass filter if you tell it that your speakers are not full-range. I do not know if it employs a crossover to redirect bass to another port.

Maybe older games being run at a higher frame rate is why I absolutely disdain video games after not playing them for a while and attempted playing stuff on newer consoles. There is also too much to control. The only games I can play...

I know more people/households with a Wii than people/households without a Wii. I don't know anyone with a PS or Xbox. Nintendo is doing just fine. They don't need to focus on making die-hard gamer hardware that has all of the latest...

It looks like in that thread all they did was downgrade an enterprise-grade product with consumer-grade gear.