New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by fewness

Quote:Originally Posted by Jpmboy  yup, thanks - i made some custom rez in the nvidia cp for this 4K monitor, trying to increase the refresh rate (a few guys on reduser forum claim to have 4K at >32Hz... probably bs), and a pixel...
Sometimes average only does not tell the whole story...look how different the same card(s) can perform...
Quote:Originally Posted by ahnafakeef But neither price is justified, it just seems so because there is no competition and because people have grown accustomed to seeing cards being priced at $1000. Did you post the same image...
if Titan @ $1000 is justified, given the performance of 780, ~$700 is a steal
Quote:Originally Posted by Jpmboy huh? downsample? From NVidia control panel you can create pretty much any resolution you want...given that your monitor can handle it...
Resolution does not have 4k choice yet in the form. I just clicked the multi one.
my 4k run from March, finally turns out to be useful fewness --- i7 3930k @ 4.6 GHz --- 2 x Titan SLI @ 1071MHz / 3504MHz --- 50.9 FPS ---- 2131
Did a overclock test using Hitman benchmark. With modified 300W power and 1.212V voltage it reached 1280 core/3500 vRAM. ...and finally died at 1293...
Quote:Originally Posted by KaRLiToS If I open a 2560x1440 chart, will there be peole who will participate? I see that the 5670x1080 don't get enough attention. I think we should start a new thread for higher resolution. Maybe at...
Quote:Originally Posted by KaRLiToS CallSignVega, find me another benchmark and I'll do something nice I agree Valley is not optimized Yet, but its the same in both camps. It's like if they ignored it. Actually the Graphics Test 1...
New Posts  All Forums: