Posts by ezzep123

Yeah, I hear you. Funny how all the benchmark sites are so biased about every little thing. Who's going to notice a few fps differene? I mean, really, who is?

You ALL act like little kids on here, regardless whose side you're on. The OP picked his choice. Good grief, this is worse than politics.

Well, I guess I like the Trinity series because they get better fps than an Ivy Bridge i7. Don't believe me? Hit up Tom's Hardware. Oh, and with a Trinity you wouldn't need a pci-e card to game right away. But anyway, I think the OP...

Now for the other other response. If you're strictly gaming, you could try an AMD Trinity. They cost less, but you won't get as much bang for your buck. However, you won't necessarily need a video card if you're not running high-end...

Intel's will render faster at this point. Don't get me wrong--the FX will do what you want them to do, but it depends on what you're doing. If the programs use multi-threading, then the FX can in some situations outrun the iCores,...

Oh dang....AMD's going with another socket set?? Seriously, this is getting to be ridiculous. What I mean by less raw cpu power, isn't that you can't run Office or render or whatever with the Trinity. It's just that the FM* platform...

I'd agree. Go with the 8320 or a Trinity A10. The A10 has powerful IGP, but lacks in raw CPU. It's up to you. Glad you've decided to go with AMD.

Sweet. I knew that AMD wasn't giving up the speed race entirely. They just had to make a new pathway since all the AMD "loyalists" jumped ship when the i7 came out. I don't know about you guys, but my A8 Llano does what I need it to...

Has the CD burner worked before she tried to use it? Has there been any overclocking? If so, did you switch to a different cpu cooler, or are you still using the junk stock? If so, I recommend you switch to a Hyper212 Evo. Have you run...

So what's your point? You know by posting crap in the AMD forums you will be dealt with accordingly.