New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by ThePath

What about this ? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834246006 It has sandy-bridge i7 2630QM 2.0Ghz (2.9Ghz Turbo) and ATI HD 6570M I think HD 6570M can run most games on high settings @ 1366 x 768
What you said here is from your imagination, and not based on any factsE-350 (fastest Brazos CPU) can barely play most of modern games at 1024x768 with low settingshttp://www.anandtech.com/show/4023/the-brazos-performance-preview-amd-e350-benchmarked/4
What about this ? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834246006&cm_re=2630QM-_-34-246-006-_-Product
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834246006&cm_re=2630QM-_-34-246-006-_-Product This one has i7 2630QM 2.0Ghz (2.9 GHz turbo) and ATI HD6570. It cost only $899
LOL !!Do anyone trust AMD words ?Didn't AMD claim in the past that Agena is supposed to be 40% faster than intel quad core ?If AMD is confident about performance of Bulldozer, then why not let an independent and neutral source to test it ?
Let us not forget that the TDP of all modern intel chips includes built-in GPU and integrated PCI-E lanes.
No, it won'ti3 can run any game on market very well
No, you are the one who should do that980X vs 975 in the first benchmark48.8/33.1 = 1.474, so the difference between the two is ~ 47%And the second one is6424/4379 = 1.467 ~ almost 47%
Do you mean by "no more than 33%" that difference between 6-core and 4-core nehalem could not get over 33% in any benchmark ?If that what you mean then you are very wronglook at this http://images.anandtech.com/graphs/corei7980x_031010193451/21966.pnghttp://images.anandtech.com/graphs/corei7980x_031010193451/21971.pngThe difference between 980X and similar clocked i7 975 is nearly 50% in x264 HD Video Encoding (2nd pass) and in pov-ray
Intel never sold an extreme edition for under $1000 They may drop the price of i7 970 or they might release non-extreme i7-980 for cheaper price
New Posts  All Forums: