I still question to this day since this article keeps getting bumped as to why this article is taken seriously? The headline is terribly wrong because it does not take into consideration many other factors but then it makes such a claim?
This is why I fully support Elite Dangerous. They actually have a proven track record. The game is in active development and the promises they make are guaranteed to come. This season alone is adding many features that make Star Citizen unique, which in turn nullifies Star Citizen's allure. I'm happy to say that competition is good but it looks like RSI is trying to rip people off more than they are trying to make a game worth playing.
But I loved Bastion, it was legitimately a great game, one of the best I've played actually... and then I wonder why they have to make bad games and try and fix the reviews? Just make more good games for goodness sake.
No, they are not. Bloomberg is highly politicized and so is BBC. First they wanted to regulate our free speech in video games via making up lies about violence, now it's about gambling. I'd like to solidly say that our governments are absolute scum and you're going along with it.
Why do I feel like this is a lie? They would have taken this up with AMD first and foremost, who calls a lawyer over this? I want definitive proof. I feel like this is Nvidia running damage control for AMD's biggest launch in a long time.