|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > General Hardware > General Processor Discussions | |
Phenom II x4 965 vs i5/i7
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
So, I am trying to find a comparison between these cpu's.
__________________I found two links: http://www.cpubenchmark.net/ and http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/2...hmarks,60.html One has the AMD beating the i7, the other has the i7 beating AMD. The AMD is more cost effective. I have never had an AMD. With regards to overclocking, how does the AMD stack up? Does it overclock easy like the i7? This AMD is stock 3.4ghz, but has a power consumption of 140W, seems to suck on power pretty bad. What is everyone's thoughts? I am not looking for an AMD vs Intel, just what is a better option considering budget and performance. Should I just shell out the extra cash for the i7?
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
AMD Overclocker
![]() |
It really depends on what you're going to be doing with the system. I'll try to take a non-biased approach, but keep in mind the AMD band will recommend AMD and the Intel folks will recommend, well, Intel. The fact remains that the AMD 955/965 and the i5/i7 aren't much different in games. Where you're going to see a difference is in multimedia applications, video editing, 3d design, etc. Intel has AMD beat on that big time. For gaming, the most cost effective solution is actually to go with a 955, regardless of power consumption. Your power supply that you currently have is more than enough to handle an AMD and 1-2 decent cards. In conclusion, if you're in some sort of digital design field, go with the i5 (or i7). If you're gaming on a budget, go with AMD.
__________________Also, AMD processors overclock fairly easy, with the i5 and i7 being no more/less difficult.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
In "General" Intel Core i5 beats AMD's Phenom II X4 line of processors. The Phenom II might be able to reach about the same performance as a Core i5 with a good overclock.
AMD Phenom II mainly competes Intel Core 2 Quad series of processors. While Intel Core i7 are still "Winners" in performance wise. However, when comparing both AMD Phenom II and Intel Core i7 there will be a dramatic difference in Synthetic Benchmarks, but for gaming, Core i7 will give you more performance, but the Phenom II will do the job just fine
__________________
4.0GHz CPU-Z Validation Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Good info.
__________________Yes, no design here. Only gaming. I kind of thought that I might have to up my powersupply, so that was good info. How about future proof, I know nothing is truly future proof, but how far out could you push the 965? Can you recommened 3 good boards for the 965? I only ask because I am researching all three (AMD, i5, i7), and I know zero about the AMD. I would prefer boards that are sli/crossfire ready. I dont even know if the 965 uses tri or dual channel, I will have to google that now
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Quote:
It is hard trying to balance out performance and the all mighty dollar
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
I'll help you out with those questions that you asked:
For the "Top" motherboards for the Socket AM3, I would check this thread out: http://www.overclock.net/amd-motherb...-o-c-able.html There are some motherboards that use DDR2 RAM instead of DDR3 RAM for cost purposes. Asus uses a "E" at the end of their motherboard's model number/name, while Gigabyte uses "T/-T" this indicates that it uses DDR3 RAM. Socket AM3 is fairly new, it came out this spring I believe, so it'll be around for quite some time.
__________________
4.0GHz CPU-Z Validation Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
The main difference between Core i5 and Core i7 is Hyperthreading. Core i5 has 4 cores with 4 threads, while Core i7 has Hyperthreading, which enables 4 cores to have 8 threads, it's kind of like having 2 Quad Core processors with one socket.
__________________
4.0GHz CPU-Z Validation Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Games dont even utilize the hyperthreading, so I am really starting to sway to the 1156 socket.
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Youll be happy with AMD...specially if you want to save alil money for a better GFX card. Im using the new C3 stepping of the 965 and im stable with low temps at 4Ghz. People will argue that the i5 at 4Ghz will beat a 965 at 4Ghz which is true but they dont have the future proofing (hexacores) or the two 16x PCI-E 2.0 lanes which will be utilized more with bigger and better cards coming out.
__________________
The Official MSI 790FX-GD70 Owners Thread![]()
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
id go for the the AMD the new one 125TDP, if your gaming thers no prob and you will be on AM3 i think we will have some suprises quite soon for that socket
__________________
stop looking at my sig
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|