|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > Graphics Cards - General | |
Bottlenecks Re-examined: Lightmark an OpenGL Benchmark
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
![]() |
UGH Man I feel so dumb, I kept reading over this so many times, and I just can't keep my mind on it long enough to understand it. =/ I thought I was smart....
__________________
Last edited by RickJS : 12-20-07 at 12:07 AM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
|
That isnt true at all because 3dmark benefits more off of a faster processor than gpu (cpu dependent). Just look at some of the 20K 3dmark06 scores with a highly overclocked QX9650 and a single 8800GTS 512. Now compare that 20K to 15K with a Q6600 overclocked to 3.4 GHZ and the same gpu. The only reason why the QX9650 got 5K more points is because 3dmark is mainly all cpu. Theres no way that a Q6600 at 3.4GHZ is bottlenecking a 8800GTS 512 lol.
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
No, I'm NOT RotB.
![]() |
At least in not real games.
__________________
I hate people who non-verbally retaliate over differences of opinion. Long live Civil Disobedience. Quote:
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
No, I'm NOT RotB.
![]() |
Bump, damn it. This was a novel piece of research, and I still feel is the definitive work on it so far.
__________________
I hate people who non-verbally retaliate over differences of opinion. Long live Civil Disobedience. Quote:
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Hackintosh FTW!
![]() |
Sorry to bump an old thread but why are your threads deleted in protest?
__________________
Sony Alpha A300|18-70 f/3.5-5.6|70-300G f/4.5-5.6|Minolta AF 50 f/1.7 Quote below taken from post asking how to remove TIM
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|