|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > Graphics Cards - General | |
Graphics Card Ranking (3rd time's a charm...)
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#201 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
Cut costs
![]() |
Quote:
I'm sorry I don't have the review since I forgot the website lol Here's a review of the GDDR3 version, though http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforce-9500-gt-review/1
__________________
Quote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#202 (permalink) |
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Thanks for keeping this thread updated everyone.
I'm looking forward to seeing where the new 9400GT for $60 lands in your rankings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#203 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
my time is just beginning
![]() |
awesome thread, and nice work on keeping it up to date.
![]() has anyone thought about a mobile GPU ranking? i have always thought it would be a great idea, but hard to get accurate data for.
__________________
Overclock.net Downloads Section![]() Overclock.net Backpacking, Camping and Climbing Thread
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#204 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
|
please update:
GTX260 is now faster than the 4870 ![]() http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...on,2007-7.html
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#205 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Audiophile
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Audio Setup WINAMP >--> DIAMOND XS71 COAX OUTPUT(bitperfect cmedia drivers) >-->Zero DAC(frankenmod, earth OPA)>-->LITTLE DOT 1+(mullard ef92 tubes, opa627)>-->AKG K601>-->EARS
Last edited by thecheeseofmanynames : 09-07-08 at 01:18 PM |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#206 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
![]() |
The 260 is NOT better than the 4870.
__________________
Pros: I loaded up Bioshock and maxed out the settings, but this graphics slit the game's throat then ate it's entrails for dessert. It slammed Assassin's Creed's head onto the curb then stomped its head into that curb until it was nothing but a bloody pulp. This card is one bad mo-fo. It'll backhand your sister and degrade your mom, but they will still love it and want to date it because it is just that good. I love this card so much that I burned my tongue trying to french kiss it, and I still keep trying.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#207 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
Cut costs
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#208 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
|
Quote:
FPS / % over the 4850 @100% GeForce GTX 260 (896 MB) 3464.8 116.8 Radeon HD 4870 (512 MB) 3355.7 113.2 Please DO READ before posting comments like "it's OC'd and stuff" makes me look like a retard. C'mon.I know the 4870 was faster. More mature nvidia drivers now make the 260 faster.
__________________
Last edited by unbreakable : 09-07-08 at 01:55 PM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#209 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
|
I don't even think you read the
whole thing, much less clicked on the link. Tom's posted an article on how slower and pathetic the 260 was versus the 4870... This is a new one, and i suggest you read it, and come up with your own proof to counter what I posted.
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#210 (permalink) |
|
New to Overclock.net
|
Tom's Hardware charts are extremely unreliable. I never used them as reference even when I was comparing the 4870 against the GTX 260 when the cards first came out.
I still have not seen a review which compares a 4870 with 8.8 against a 260 with the latest forceware drivers. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|