|
|
|
 |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > Graphics Cards - General | |
nVidia 7950 GT KO and Crysis
|
||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
03-08-08
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
*cough* Stock *cough*
|
nVidia 7950 GT KO and Crysis
Hi all, I have a single 7950 GT KO PCIe card in my computer and I'm wondering what settings should this card be able to play in Crysis? I have a Athlon X2 4400+ 2GB 667MHz DDRII RAM, 320GB HD, Windows Vista Home Premium. I'm happy to play @ 1280x1024 even though my native is 1680x1050. I've tried Crysis before and was able to play @ 1024x768 with everything at medium except Physics.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
03-08-08
|
#2 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
is not the Stig
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: N.W. Washington
Posts: 4,093
Rep: 338
 Unique Rep: 264
Trader Rating: 14
|
That card will not handle it too well. I think you'll have much better luck at 1280 instead of 1680.
__________________
World Cup Predictions! ESI Juli@ -> Soloz Audio Reference RCA -> TCA Gizmo -> Onix SL-1 wire -> AV123 ELT525M's Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
03-08-08
|
#3 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
 
|
That card is a tad better than mine, I tend to run at 1024*768 all on LOW and get 35-40fps
__________________
Quote:
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
03-08-08
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
*cough* Stock *cough*
|
Also, which set of drivers would be more efficient for my card? The 163 or the 169 Drivers?
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
03-10-08
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
169 drivers. You should be able to eke out mostly medium settings for Crysis at 12x10. The 7950GT was a kickass card back in the day though.
__________________
3.00 GHz - CPU-Z Validated 3.20 GHz - CPUZ Validated Small Form Factor (SFF) Cases - Because those of you with big towers are compensating for something!
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
03-10-08
|
#6 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
 
|
At 1024 x 768 with med settings. High "Ultra" settings on Texture, Game Effects, and Physics gives me 22-25 fps on my 7900gs. Can't wait until the ATI HD 4000 series comes out!
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
03-10-08
|
#7 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
*cough* Stock *cough*
|
Quote:
Last edited by SnoFox4 : 03-10-08 at 08:32 PM |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
03-10-08
|
#8 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
The head B00B!
 
|
Well I get around 20-25FPS with all Medium at 1440x900 res with my single 8600GTS. I would think a 7900 should be able to handle the same. Make sure you're running 64bit (if you're on a 64bit OS only though), and DX9.
__________________
Quote:
 How To: Install Car Audio to a PC Power Supply ¡¡¡ʍʇɟ qn1ɔ uoıʇɐıɔǝɹddɐ 939 ʇǝʞɔos ǝɥʇ
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
03-10-08
|
#9 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
*cough* Stock *cough*
|
I'll update my FPS when I put XP on my second partition. Just found out Vista makes games 10-15% slower =0 !!! 18*.10= 1.8 That is the difference between a slide-show and and game =P
__________________
Last edited by SnoFox4 : 03-10-08 at 08:22 PM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
03-10-08
|
#10 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,097
Rep: 52
Unique Rep: 41
Trader Rating: 0
|
Quote:
__________________
----------------------------- E8400 at 4.4GHz  P13491 in Futuremark Vantage 18774 3DMarks in 3DMark06
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
