|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > Graphics Cards - General | |
GTX 260 or 4870 at 1920x1200???
|
||
| View Poll Results: 4870 or GTX 260 | |||
| VisionTek 4870 |
|
67 | 84.81% |
| EVGA GTX 260 |
|
12 | 15.19% |
| Voters: 79. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 (permalink) | ||||||||||
|
Advanced Soviet Tech ftw
![]() |
the only difference in 55NM is because Nvidia wants better yields 50% vs 40% look at 9800GTX vs 9800GTX+ not much difference plus as dragosmp said better AA performance
__________________
Me: Thats a Russian Coin RonindeBeatrice: It clearly isn't... Where do you get off misinforming people? Microsis: You are doubting a guy named A_Russian with a Russian-themed avatar about a coin being Russian? you're doubting a guy named A_Russian about an AK47?! omg just when you thought you heard it all
Last edited by A Russian :D : 07-16-08 at 03:25 AM |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#32 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
4.0ghz
![]() |
From the tons of review I've read I'd go for the 4870 for a simple reason: AA performance.
The review @tweaktown is made roughly without AA, the others generally with AA, hence the difference. The 48x0 series offers free 4xAA, so better image quality at the same performance. Passing @55nm is not going to resolve this for nvidia, as they would have to redesign the gpu. To wait for nv's 55nm... if the power consumption will drop, if the clocks would get better, if the performance would increase, if they'll also make free AA, there's an awful lot of ifs. By the time nv 55nm appears, ATI's 4870x2 will also appear, maybe they'll also make a new revision to the GPU so that it clocks higher and consumes less, but this is all just supposition.
__________________
Mini-ITX Acrylic Pyramid - check it out My guides: How to: Silence any HDD with 1$ Driver modd: SB Live! and Audigy Value/SE/LE/24bit in X-fi Xtreme Audio Driver modd: enable Crystalizer and X-Fi console on Audigy EMU cards
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#33 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
![]() |
Quote:
The p35 is a proven overclocker, and if you want to overclock your CPU then your guaranteed with the p35, the p45 is still new.
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#34 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
At this point in time, there is no reason to get a P35 board over P45. You're losing out on PCI-E 2.0 and better Crossfire capabilities, not to mention probably improved 45nm overclocking and ICH10. The prices are similar.
__________________As for graphics cards, I would advise you to get the HD4870 unless the GTX260 drops even further, which is highly unlikely. I'm in the same boat as you. I'm tempted to just get the best performance/price card, the HD4850 though.
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#35 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
|
When you use the Nvidia Physx driver on your GPU, your GPU performance will suffer, ive tested this. And it isnt like 1-2 FPS, but i lost 7fps or more of my GPU performance. Example, Crysis DX9, 16x10, noAA, noAF, all high settings , 175.16, average FPS is ~44, and with 177.41+Physx driver same settings, average FPS is ~37. And then another example 3DMark03, i got 45K with 177.41 and physx driver and 53k with 175.16.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#36 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||
|
*cough* Stock *cough*
![]() |
Quote:
So what can the step up do? Buy a GTX 260 now and hope in less than 3 months they shrink it and step up to that? I guess that works. So you rather have folding performance than gaming performance, i guess some people are just different
__________________
e6550 @ 3.8ghz ![]() Quote:
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#37 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
![]() |
there is only a few fps difference, bearly able to see in the actual game, also im not taking about my set up im saying that when the next GPU series come out, he bascially gets $300 off immediatly. I dont have an EVGA card because when i bought my 8800GT all other 512mb 8800GTS where $180-200 and the zotac amp was $154 after rebate, the EVGA cards didn't have any rebates. You guys are honestly rediculous, because i didn't jump on the bandwagon, you tare me apart for anything, how does my rig have anything to do with this thread?
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#38 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
![]() |
Ok, well Im deciding to go X48, so no more P45ing and 4870 is really looking good guys
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#39 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
![]() |
Quote:
However, if we followed some of the logic in here, we could do this... If's for Nvidia: If I get 55nm, I will get cooler, cheaper, faster and with nehalem I can finally SLI on a stable chipset. These If's are all hardware related. If's for ATI: If people want to fold with me (I can only currently use 320SP because they are using the core for the 3XXX series of cards) they will need a new core. If people want to use some sort of GPU based physics acceleration, they will have to wait for Havok support which is coming (and used in far more games than PhysX). These If's are all software related. Looking at the if's, I'd wager that it'll be easier to manipulate the software if's than the hardware ones.
__________________
Air Cooled Rampage Formula Results 24,140 in 3D06 P16,463 in 3DV H10,992 in 3DV 4.2GHz Quad w00t!! ![]() "And Shepherds we shall be for thee, my Lord, for thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand Our feet may swiftly carry out Thy commands. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee And teeming with souls shall it ever be. In Nomeni Patri et Filii Spiritus Sancti."
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#40 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Overclocker
![]() |
Quote:
4870 FTW! ![]() If the GTX 280 was $300-$350, then I say go Nvidia, otherwise getting a 4870 is a no brainer.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|