Grahphics Card Ranking 4th Time - Page 10 - Overclock.net

ShaveWithALightsaber · 06-05-09

aww come ON. 8800 Ultra is faster than a 9800GTX+ by far.

Conley · 06-05-09

GTX 275 goes above HD4890. Here's some graphs from a GTX 275 roundup, and another graph with an OC version of HD 4890.

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...le-bfg-16.html
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/944/6/

You might want to put 275 in front of 280, also.

http://www.futurelooks.com/zotac-gef...card-review/3/

CJRhoades · 06-05-09

Your missing Radeon HD 4650. It's slightly better than the 9600GT but I don't know much else of where it stands on the list.

TheSandman · 06-10-09

the 4650 is slightly slower than an HD3850, it is not faster than a 9600GT.

also according to your only working link the 4890 wins 3 out of 5 game tests

Xenomorph · 06-13-09

This thread is amazing. I always go to them when I want to compare cards.

I only have one issue: the placement of the Voodoo Banshee on the list.

That was a card that ran *faster* than a single Voodoo 2, and could play many games faster than it as well. The Voodoo 2 outperformed it in multi-texture games only, or when it was configured via SLI. They were using pretty much the same 3D hardware, but the Banshee was shipped clocked 10%-15% faster.

Yet, the Voodoo Banshee is placed several spots lower than the Voodoo 2, without "SLI" being mentioned anywhere.

I can understand maybe placing the Voodoo2 above the Banshee because it "could" do better in some configurations, but it seems to be placed WAY above the Banshee (without mention of SLI), even when the Banshee was considered a "better" card in many ways. It was what became the Voodoo 3 after all ("Banshee 2" would have been a more appropriate name for that).

Voodoo 2 in SLI
.
.
Voodoo Banshee
Voodoo 2

UkGouki · 06-16-09

woohoo my 9800gtx+'s are in the top 20 im happy with that

Jewels · 06-16-09

Interesting observation (to me at least):

Present, GTX 295, (#1)
2½ years ago, 8800 GTX (#20)
5 years ago, 6800 Ultra (#80)

Blackhawk4 · 06-16-09

Nvidia keeps on impressing me....but **** can it hurt your wallet at times.

TF876 · 06-17-09

The 4650 is below the 9600GSO and surely the 4670 shouldnt be lower than the 4650.

Anth0789 · 06-17-09

Quote:

Originally Posted by TF876

The 4650 is below the 9600GSO and surely the 4670 shouldnt be lower than the 4650.

That is why my thread is more accurate:
http://www.overclock.net/graphics-ca...time-last.html

		Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > Graphics Cards - General
Grahphics Card Ranking 4th Time

06-13-09	#95 (permalink)
Xenomorph New to Overclock.net Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 4 Rep: 0 Unique Rep: 0 Trader Rating: 0	This thread is amazing. I always go to them when I want to compare cards. I only have one issue: the placement of the Voodoo Banshee on the list. That was a card that ran faster than a single Voodoo 2, and could play many games faster than it as well. The Voodoo 2 outperformed it in multi-texture games only, or when it was configured via SLI. They were using pretty much the same 3D hardware, but the Banshee was shipped clocked 10%-15% faster. Yet, the Voodoo Banshee is placed several spots lower than the Voodoo 2, without "SLI" being mentioned anywhere. I can understand maybe placing the Voodoo2 above the Banshee because it "could" do better in some configurations, but it seems to be placed WAY above the Banshee (without mention of SLI), even when the Banshee was considered a "better" card in many ways. It was what became the Voodoo 3 after all ("Banshee 2" would have been a more appropriate name for that). Voodoo 2 in SLI . . Voodoo Banshee Voodoo 2

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)