|
|
|
 |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > Graphics Cards - General | |
Graphics Card Ranking (5th Time And Last) (Updated Daily)
|
||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
10-10-09
|
#121 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
 
|
Anthony, you got a wrong impression like the bigger vram is the better card performs. i see that in the list you made. it's not actually true. you put 4870x2 GB top of 5870 1GB. There's no way 4870X2 can outperform a 5870. Even if a manufacturer actually bundles it with 3GB ram it just can't. Clocks speeds,TMU and ROP count make 5870 is absolute winner.
__________________
damn, i'm good.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
10-10-09
|
#122 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
‘†|Övëřçløçкëđ 4 Ļїfë|†’
 
|
Quote:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/HIS/HD_5850/30.html
__________________
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
10-10-09
|
#123 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
|
well, the gtx295 is still on top, and the 5870 is next, but the x2 will pwn the 295 for sure...
The 4870x2 wont outperform the 5870, thats true  [edit]@ above, hmm, thats right.....  [edit2] 08 Geforce GTX 275 1792MB 09 Radeon HD4890 2GB 10 Geforce GTX 280 1GB 11 Geforce GTX 275 896MB 12 Radeon HD4890 1GB 13 Radeon HD4850X2 1GB not sure about 12 and 13
__________________
Quote:
Last edited by Bastiaan_NL : 10-10-09 at 05:30 PM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
10-10-09
|
#124 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
‘†|Övëřçløçкëđ 4 Ļїfë|†’
|
Problem is that how can GTX 275 beat a 4850X2> If I put it over the 4890 then the 4850X2 under 4890 that wouldn't be right.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
10-10-09
|
#125 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
|
That's one review, other reviews show the 4890 ahead in many games.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
10-10-09
|
#126 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
|
editted post above.
But ye, if the 4890 is better than the 4850x2 than it will be below the 4890. Its just all doing a step back... Only i dont know if the 4850x2 or the 4890 1gig is better... anyways, i think that list above is better [edit]@ above, i havent seen any review showing the 4890 better than the gtx275...
__________________
Quote:
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
10-10-09
|
#127 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
|
Quote:
Anyhow, here's the first two charts I could find: http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/g...1200,1473.html http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3650&p=3 Both show the 4890 winning more often than not at highest settings. Ensue argument. @OP, the 4850x2 is generally better than the 4890.
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
10-10-09
|
#128 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
Well, that 4870x2 with 2gb vram is not faster at resolutions below 1920x1080. so in my opinion it would be unfair to call it winner just because it gives better framerates at higher resolutions.
avarage user has 1680x1050, 1920x1080 or 1920x1200. so they'd be disappointed buying a 4870x2 after checking your list and deciding that it still outperforms 5870.right?
__________________
damn, i'm good.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
10-12-09
|
#129 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
‘†|Övëřçløçкëđ 4 Ļїfë|†’
|
ATI's new HD5770 has been added to the list it seems its around close to the 4870 512.
http://www.hardwarezone.com/articles...036&cid=3&pg=9
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
10-13-09
|
#130 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
‘†|Övëřçløçкëđ 4 Ļїfë|†’
|
HD5750 is now the list also:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/HIS/HD_5770/30.html
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
