|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > Graphics Cards - General | |
Graphics Card Ranking (5th Time And Last) (Updated Daily)
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#131 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
![]() |
Add the G210 and GT220 to the list. The GT220 should be Nvidia's answer to the HD4650. Right in between the 9600gt and 9500gt in performance. The G210 should be ranked much lower, comparable to the 9400gt, since it only has 16 SP.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#132 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Overclocker in Training
|
I have 4850 x2 2gb version. Is it worth upgrading my video card to 5850?
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#133 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
‘†|Övëřçløçкëđ 4 Ļїfë|†’
![]() |
Im going to have to wait for reviews to come.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#134 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Ultimate Quad Core Clock for Clock Benchmarks: Thesis/HTPC Notebook: Puma's Cartwheel
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#135 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
AMD Overclocker
![]() |
Quote:
Example of the 5770 beating the 4870 1gb (significant margin): http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon...review-test/15 5770 losing to 4870 1gb: http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon...review-test/16 Tie: http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon...review-test/14 At resolutions above 1680x1050 (now common), the 5770 1gb is overall better than the 4870 512mb. Not to mention the drivers are immature, DirectX 11, etc. If TechPowerUp is being used as the main indicator, check out the performance summary...where the 5770 wins, it's by a large margin (10%)...when it loses, it's within testing error (2% or less): http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/HIS/HD_5770/30.html
__________________
My secondary (GF) system: - MSI K9A2 CF v2 - Athlon II x2 250 (@3.4GHz) - 4 GB G.Skill 1066 RAM - Geforce 9600GT w/Accelero S1 rev2 - WD Caviar Blue 500GB - OCZ StealthXStream 500W - Cooler Master Gladiator 600 case - IDE DVD burner
Last edited by smoothjk : 10-14-09 at 01:11 PM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#136 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
‘†|Övëřçløçкëđ 4 Ļїfë|†’
![]() |
Its updated...
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#137 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
‘†|Övëřçløçкëđ 4 Ļїfë|†’
![]() |
Added the GT 220:
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Z...GT_220/30.html What I find weird is why is the 1GB slower than the 512MB???
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#138 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
WaterCooler
![]() |
Maybe the Palit is clocked a bit higher than the zotac, and just a better pcb, but i dont know... pretty weird indeed...
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#139 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
|
I don't get it, why did they make a slow card now?
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#140 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
For the main stream market. People that just want a cheap video card. Not for gamers for sure.
__________________
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|