Graphics Card Ranking (5th Time And Last) (Updated Daily) - Page 9 - Overclock.net

Anth0789 · 08-10-09

Quote:

Originally Posted by MintMouse

Do two 4890s crossfire'd really beat two 4870x2s Crossfired and GTX275/280 Tri-SLi'ed?

Yeah its a mistake its fixed now.

JKBenchmarks · 08-10-09

You can quadfire 4890's?

Anth0789 · 08-10-09

Quote:

Originally Posted by JKBenchmarks

You can quadfire 4890's?

Yes you can.

Gripen90 · 08-12-09

Hmm I've watched this getting updated several times, but haven't bothered to add some corrections, but I thought now I might as well do. I pretty much had every single card on the list (80+ graphics cards - from S3 Trio+ to GTX295).

Anyhow to comments:

It baffles me that you rate Radeon 9600Pro over Radeon 9500Pro when every one knows that the Radeon 9500Pro was faster. In fact so fast that it could give Radeon 9700 a run for it money. ATi realized that the Radeon 9500Pro was too fast and too cheap compared to the others in their own line, and therefore we didn't see Radeon 9500Pro in stores for more than 6months before it got replaced by the almost as fast but still not as anti-aliasing strong Radeon 9600Pro. I remembers having Radeon 9500Pro ordered in dec. 02 but first got one in feb. 03 due to supply shortage. Remember the Radeon 9500Pro had 8x pixelpipelines and the Radeon 9600Pro was crippled to only 4x pixel pipelines. Increasing the Mhz on core and memory didn't do much help when faced with higher resolutions and anti-aliasing.

Also where is GeForce FX 5200 Ultra ? the card that even beats FX5600 ?

And there's also Radeon 9800Pro 128MB just ranking below the 256MB sibling.

And lastly (sofar) - How could you forget ATi Rage Fury MAXX !!! it's just below GeForce 256DDR in performance.

theCanadian · 08-13-09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gripen90

Hmm I've watched this getting updated several times, but haven't bothered to add some corrections, but I thought now I might as well do. I pretty much had every single card on the list (80+ graphics cards - from S3 Trio+ to GTX295).

Anyhow to comments:

It baffles me that you rate Radeon 9600Pro over Radeon 9500Pro when every one knows that the Radeon 9500Pro was faster. In fact so fast that it could give Radeon 9700 a run for it money. ATi realized that the Radeon 9500Pro was too fast and too cheap compared to the others in their own line, and therefore we didn't see Radeon 9500Pro in stores for more than 6months before it got replaced by the almost as fast but still not as anti-aliasing strong Radeon 9600Pro. I remembers having Radeon 9500Pro ordered in dec. 02 but first got one in feb. 03 due to supply shortage. Remember the Radeon 9500Pro had 8x pixelpipelines and the Radeon 9600Pro was crippled to only 4x pixel pipelines. Increasing the Mhz on core and memory didn't do much help when faced with higher resolutions and anti-aliasing.

Also where is GeForce FX 5200 Ultra ? the card that even beats FX5600 ?

And there's also Radeon 9800Pro 128MB just ranking below the 256MB sibling.

And lastly (sofar) - How could you forget ATi Rage Fury MAXX !!! it's just below GeForce 256DDR in performance.

Epic first post dude. +rep and welcome to OCN.

Open1Your1Eyes0 · 08-17-09

GTX280 is better than GTX275. Might want to fix that. Watch out for the color coding the names are reversed I dunno why: http://www.futurelooks.com/zotac-gef...card-review/3/

mrtn400 · 08-17-09

Wow, when was there a fourth one?

Well it's nice to see someone actually made a SLI vs. CF list and continually updates the OP.

m|dg3t · 08-17-09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gripen90

Hmm I've watched this getting updated several times, but haven't bothered to add some corrections, but I thought now I might as well do. I pretty much had every single card on the list (80+ graphics cards - from S3 Trio+ to GTX295).

Anyhow to comments:

It baffles me that you rate Radeon 9600Pro over Radeon 9500Pro when every one knows that the Radeon 9500Pro was faster. In fact so fast that it could give Radeon 9700 a run for it money. ATi realized that the Radeon 9500Pro was too fast and too cheap compared to the others in their own line, and therefore we didn't see Radeon 9500Pro in stores for more than 6months before it got replaced by the almost as fast but still not as anti-aliasing strong Radeon 9600Pro. I remembers having Radeon 9500Pro ordered in dec. 02 but first got one in feb. 03 due to supply shortage. Remember the Radeon 9500Pro had 8x pixelpipelines and the Radeon 9600Pro was crippled to only 4x pixel pipelines. Increasing the Mhz on core and memory didn't do much help when faced with higher resolutions and anti-aliasing.

Also where is GeForce FX 5200 Ultra ? the card that even beats FX5600 ?

And there's also Radeon 9800Pro 128MB just ranking below the 256MB sibling.

And lastly (sofar) - How could you forget ATi Rage Fury MAXX !!! it's just below GeForce 256DDR in performance.

Many forget because its before their time with computers

But I love your first post, not only did I laugh but I was surprised to see a first time poster with so much information!

Anth0789 · 08-17-09

Little update...

Artas1984 · 08-23-09

There are some BS is this ranking..

X1950XT is quite better than X1900XTX, this is not the case with nvidia, where 7900GTX > 7950GT - EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT!

8800GTS 320 is a joke - in anandtech and xbitlabts it got smacked by X1950XTX in every game above 1600X1200 and in this list it is higher, this can't be right...

HD2900GT, sadly, is another joke, it should be even below X1900XT..

HD4650 - spare me for god sakes, it is a WEAK CARD, 128 bit and DDR2, you have to be FUCin kidding me getting this so high!!!

HD4770 is no way faster than HD4830 and HD4670 & HD3870 DDR3 is no way batter than a HD2900XT.

Fix this now!

08-23-09	#90 (permalink)
Artas1984 Case Modder Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 202 Rep: 6 Unique Rep: 5 Trader Rating: 0	There are some BS is this ranking.. X1950XT is quite better than X1900XTX, this is not the case with nvidia, where 7900GTX > 7950GT - EVERYBODY KNOWS THAT! 8800GTS 320 is a joke - in anandtech and xbitlabts it got smacked by X1950XTX in every game above 1600X1200 and in this list it is higher, this can't be right... HD2900GT, sadly, is another joke, it should be even below X1900XT.. HD4650 - spare me for god sakes, it is a WEAK CARD, 128 bit and DDR2, you have to be FUCin kidding me getting this so high!!! HD4770 is no way faster than HD4830 and HD4670 & HD3870 DDR3 is no way batter than a HD2900XT. Fix this now! Last edited by Artas1984 : 08-23-09 at 05:12 PM

		Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > Graphics Cards - General
Graphics Card Ranking (5th Time And Last) (Updated Daily)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)