|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Graphics Cards > Graphics Cards - General | |
Graphics card ranking
|
||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#481 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
Quote:
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#482 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Graphics Card Aficionado
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: saratoga springs,new york
Posts: 937
Rep: 22
![]() Unique Rep: 21
Trader Rating: 0
|
gamespot.com and toms hardware have alot of becnchies so there is your proof to put them on the list.
__________________
Team Fortress 2 Club ![]() Gr33n Machine ..:Q6600 Club:.. 17482 3dmark 06 "There is realistically no difference between the sound reducing properties of egg cartons and sound absorbing foam. The biggest difference is that egg cartons are a good deal more flamable." gonx
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#483 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
hmm gamespot and tomshardware, two hardware sites that the community doesnt trust as a whole, gamespot does great game reviews, but shoody card reviews.
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#484 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Breaking Bad Since 2008
![]() |
Who doesn't trust the card reviews on Tom's Hardware?
__________________
Links: [ Project Nighthawk (NEW!) | Project Ablative Armor | G15 LCD Program Archive ] [ Intel Core i7 Voltage Limits | Overclocking Effects on Benchmark Scores | Explanation of LCD Terminology ]
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
#485 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
the forums memebers at tomshardware dont trust his reviews and will admit it
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#486 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
Breaking Bad Since 2008
![]() |
What about this VGA card rankings? I've used his reviews and have never been steered wrong.
__________________
Links: [ Project Nighthawk (NEW!) | Project Ablative Armor | G15 LCD Program Archive ] [ Intel Core i7 Voltage Limits | Overclocking Effects on Benchmark Scores | Explanation of LCD Terminology ]
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
#487 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
4.0 GHz
![]() |
i dont trust them, ive run the same cards he has on alot worse hardware and done alot better in benchmarks and i dont mean 20 or 30 pts i mean once it was more than 1000 3dmarks off.
__________________
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#488 (permalink) | |
|
New to Overclock.net
![]() |
Quote:
Maybe X1900XTX is overall better than 7900GTX, but there is no doubt that 7900GTX is overall better than X1950XT 512MB and X1950XT 256MB |
|
|
|
|
|
#489 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
New to Overclock.net
![]()
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: caldwell, Idaho
Posts: 3,387
Rep: 166
![]() ![]() Unique Rep: 125
Trader Rating: 2
|
the x1950xt and the x1950xtx are the same card more or less. the only real difference is the GDDR3 vs GDDR4 and 256 vs 512mb of ram. those won't make much of a difference unless running at ultra high resolutions. and so if the x1950xtx beats the 7900gtx the 1950xt should as well.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#490 (permalink) | ||||||||||||||
|
Breaking Bad Since 2008
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Links: [ Project Nighthawk (NEW!) | Project Ablative Armor | G15 LCD Program Archive ] [ Intel Core i7 Voltage Limits | Overclocking Effects on Benchmark Scores | Explanation of LCD Terminology ]
|
||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|