|
![]() |
Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Components > Hard Drives & Storage | |
Please post your HDtune 2.55 results **SPREADSHEET UP, PLEASE RE-READ FIRST POST**
|
||
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
catmmm approved wierdo
![]() |
HD Tune 2.55
__________________Download here: http://www.hdtune.com/hdtune_255.exe There's always being people claiming "Oh, my drive is way faster than yours". So, now we're creating a database of the performance of HDDs. This thread was originally made by Robilar, and people only posted their results, there was no spreadsheet. As of June 2009, this has changed. Now, i've created a Google Docs function and tied it to this thread. Here's how it works: Please input your results into the form linked below after running the HDTune tests. It's self explanatory, but the questions have instructions by them. If you have any questions ask. When done, hit "Submit" and your results will automatically be entered into the spreadsheet. Please allow up to five minutes for your results to appear, as it refreshes every five minutes. CLICK HERE TO INPUT RESULTS If you swore you added your data into the form again, i deleted it because i'm tired of spending time fixing mistakes that i clearly told you not to make...feel free to add yourself again; follow the rules this time.
Last edited by wierdo124 : 1 Week Ago at 12:28 AM Reason: Added content for new system |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
![]() |
good idea, Im running mine now. I think you should put a list up of hard drives.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
The Dark Passenger
![]() |
I thought about that but its just easier to add a list as members post. Too many drives out there.
__________________I'll create a chart as we get more data in.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
![]() |
Thats what I meant, but I can't get my computer to idle down to get the most accurate reading.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
The Dark Passenger
![]() |
The joys of vista....
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
![]() |
No, its not vista, infact I love vista. I just forgot to get everything turned off.
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
The Dark Passenger
![]() |
Here is another one:
WD 250 GB (WDC WD2500AAKS-00VSA) Transfer Rate: Min/Max/Avg: 15.6/103.7/83.9 MB/Second Access Time: 16.4 ms Burst Rate: 145.1 MB/sec CPU usage: 1.6% Note the difference between a 16MB cache AAKS and a 16MB cache Velociraptor....
Last edited by Robilar : 11-27-08 at 07:41 PM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
PC Gamer
![]() |
Seagate Barracuda ST3250410AS 250GB 7200 RPM 16MB
__________________Transfer Rate: min: 35.5 MB/s max: 94.7 average: 76.9 Access Time: 16.0 ms Burst Rate: 183.0 MB/sec Cpu Usage: 2.1%
Last edited by mr.derp : 11-27-08 at 07:48 PM |
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
The Dark Passenger
![]() |
cpu usage is a good idea, I'll add that too
__________________
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |||||||||||||
|
The Dapper Swindler
![]() |
Seagate 7200.3 2.5" Mobile HDD 320GB 16MB (ST9320421AS)
Transfer Rate: Min/Max/Avg: 41.1/85.0/65.3 (MB/Second) Access Time: 16.4 ms Burst Rate: 62.4 MB/second Not bad for a mobile HDD. Lots of turbulence though. Its almost as loud as my gpu fan.
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|