Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Components > Hard Drives & Storage

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-22-09   #1 (permalink)
Overclocker in Training
 
Sirrush's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In my room
Posts: 71

Rep: 1 Sirrush Unknown
Unique Rep: 1
Trader Rating: 0
Default Should I use...

one of my old 80gb HDD for my OS and my new 500gb for everything else, or should I just use my 500gb and make a separate partition for my OS?

Also, would it slow me down at all if I used a PATA HDD as my OS drive, or should I take apart my other computer and steal that HDD. (Both are 80gb, 7200 rpm drives).

Thanks in advance for the feedback.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Somenamehere View Post
If you want to touch a female breast before you are 40 stay clear of WoW.

System: My Desktop :D
CPU
Intel Core i7-860 @3.15GHz
Motherboard
GIGABYTE GA-P55-UD4P
Memory
OCZ Platinum 8GB (4 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3
Graphics Card
XFX Radeon HD 5770 1GB DDR5
Hard Drive
WD 500GB caviar green
Power Supply
Corsair TX750W PSU
Case
Cooler Master HAF 932
OS
Windows 7 Ultimate
Monitor
Samsung 2443BW-HAS
Sirrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-09   #2 (permalink)
Folding Fanatic
 
theCanadian's Avatar
 
amd nvidia

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: North Carolina, USA
Posts: 2,954
Blog Entries: 4

Rep: 243 theCanadian is acknowledged by manytheCanadian is acknowledged by manytheCanadian is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 179
Folding Team Rank: 84
Trader Rating: 21
Default

As it stands right now, it doesn't really matter. But if I was you, I'd try to stay SATA in case you want to go RAID in the future. SATA RAID is probably a little easier to manage, just from a cable standpoint. Just a thought.

So to answer your question. PATA shouldn't slow you down for a single drive.

Also, the newer the drive the better. Unless it's a Hitachi or a Samsung or something like that.
__________________


Its gonna be like perana on a rotting cow in there when it happens...I'm looking forward to it. - DIRTYDUCK


The only difference here is that this time the rod that Apple is shoving up your ass isn't silicone, its a rough wooden shaft. Instead of leaving the customer feeling violated, they are leaving behind bloody splinters. - nathris


System: Move On It v2
CPU
AMD Phenerom II X3 720 Barack Edition
Motherboard
Gigabyte MA790X-UD4P
Memory
G.Skill PI (2x2GB) DDR2 1100
Graphics Card
XFX GTS250 512MB + EVGA 9800GT 512MB
Hard Drive
SATA II 160GB + 2x 500GB Storage Drive
Sound Card
SoundBlaster Audigy 4
Power Supply
SevenTeam ST-750ZAF 750W Modular
Case
Cooler Master CM 690
CPU cooling
ThermalTake Big Typhoon (lapped)
GPU cooling
XFX Stock + ThermalTake DuOrb (lapped)
OS
Windows XP Pro Performance Edition / Windows 7
Monitor
HANNspree HF229H 22"
Overclock.net - 2009 Chimp Challenge Champions 2 Million+ Folding at Home points

Last edited by theCanadian : 11-22-09 at 10:00 PM
theCanadian is offline I fold for Overclock.net theCanadian's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-09   #3 (permalink)
*cough* Stock *cough*
 
intel ati

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,075

Rep: 168 ComGuards is acknowledged by manyComGuards is acknowledged by many
Unique Rep: 129
Trader Rating: 0
Default

80GB 7200RPM IDE Drive? In my experience - those are slow, comparatively. I have 8 WD800JB IDE HDDs that are collecting dust because they're too old and slow to run in single drive. I get a slight performance increase when I run them in RAID-0, but 8 drives in RAID-0, especially 8 old IDE drives in RAID-0, is too slow.

I would probably go with the 500GB drive as your main drive, and then use the 80GB for minor functions. i.e. move your pagefile off of drive C onto the 80GB; use the 80GB as a "temp" drive for downloading or extracting files. i.e. if you have a bunch of RAR or ZIP files that you've downloaded, I'd download them to the 80GB, and then extract to a partition / volume on the 500GB drive. That way, you're reading from one drive and writing to another drive. Even with an old 80GB drive, it's probably faster than reading & writing on the same drive.

Just my two cents.
__________________
System: Not-So-Skinny
CPU
Dual Intel Xeon E5520 [16 Logical Processors!]
Motherboard
Dell
Memory
24GB DDR3 12x2GB UDIMMS (18 slots total)
Graphics Card
OnBoard Matrox G200
Hard Drive
8x160GB WD-RE [Hot-Swap] RAID10 | Dell PERC6/i
Sound Card
None
Power Supply
Dell Hot-Swap Redundant 1400W
Case
Dell PowerEdge T710 Stock
CPU cooling
Stock
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
VMWare vSphere4 Enterprise Plus
Monitor
Dell iDRAC6 Remote Management [KVM-Over-IP]
ComGuards is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26 PM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.12062 seconds with 8 queries