Overclock.net - Overclocking.net
     
 
Home Gallery Reviews Blogs Register Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Members List


Go Back   Overclock.net - Overclocking.net > Industry News > Hardware News

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-05-06   #41 (permalink)
The Foxiefluff
 
Mootsfox's Avatar
 
amd ati

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 16,316
Blog Entries: 1

FAQs Submitted: 3
Hardware Reviews: 3
Trader Rating: 98
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickJS View Post
Yea, but it wont have the same performance as the other conroes. I just had a thought. Most average computer people judge a computer by megaherdz(sp?) to determine speed, wouldnt that drive away consumers?
This is only because Intel has told people, more mhz = more power.

Call me old fasioned, but I really like this single core idea. I don't like the idea of 80 cores when I could have one really fast one.
__________________

Nikon D300s - Nikon D1H - Nikon D60 - Nikon F100 - 24-120mm AF - 18-55mm VR - 55-200mm VR
Nikkor 24mm AI f/2.8 - Nikkor 35mm AI f/2.8 - Nikkor 50mm AI f/2.0 - Nikkor-S 50mm f/1.4 - Nikkor 50mm AI f/1.4

System: The Fox Box
CPU
I7 920 Max Speed Unknown!
Motherboard
ASUS GENEII
Memory
6 x 2GB OCZ DDR3-1600
Graphics Card
HD4870X2
Hard Drive
2*500GB AAKS WD's (RAID 0)
Sound Card
X-Fi Xtrememusic
Power Supply
PCP&C 750w Silencer (coppa)
Case
PowerSpec TX-366
CPU cooling
Megahalems
GPU cooling
Stock + 80mm blowing at
OS
7 Ultimate 64bit
Monitor
Samsung 305T+ 30" & Samsung 2243BWX 22" & Dell 22"
Overclock.net - 2009 Chimp Challenge Champions
Mootsfox is offline Overclocked Account Mootsfox's Gallery   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-06   #42 (permalink)
Audiophile
 
Mebby's Avatar
 
intel ati

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2,646

Rep: 77 Mebby is acknowledged by some
Unique Rep: 68
Folding Team Rank: 573
Team Name: RatRod
Trader Rating: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thumper View Post


1.416 is NOT low vcore for a Core CPU.......that's well over the factory specs for a Core 2 Duo, and it's only a 66FSB increase.......it's using a 12 multi in that screenshot to get the higher clock speed......

If they fold well, and are cheap and there may be room in my house for one........
Sorry, I googled it.

I was looking at the Core Solo U1400 with its 1.1V
__________________
Don't worry if it's hard, if your not a tard you will prevail.

System: Core Power!
CPU
E6400 @ 3.2Ghz
Motherboard
Maximus Extreme
Memory
2x 1Gb || PC3-8500
Graphics Card
Gainward 'Golden Sample' 4850
Hard Drive
80Gb Seagate
Sound Card
Supreme FX II
Power Supply
Seasonic 500W
Case
Armor LCS
CPU cooling
Water Cooled
GPU cooling
Stock
OS
XP Home
Monitor
19" Ace Widescreen
Overclock.net - 2009 Chimp Challenge Champions
Mebby is online now I fold for Overclock.net   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-06   #43 (permalink)
Linux Lobbyist
 
intel ati

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,191

Rep: 16 Pwnjohnson Unknown
Unique Rep: 15
Trader Rating: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mootsfox View Post
This is only because Intel has told people, more mhz = more power.

Call me old fasioned, but I really like this single core idea. I don't like the idea of 80 cores when I could have one really fast one.
Its like asking if you want 4 cores or 4+ GHz, . That single core could have beastly overclockability with the low FSB, its worth it if you think about it...
Pwnjohnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.


Overclock.net is a Carbon Neutral Site Creative Commons License

Terms of Service / Forum Rules | Privacy Policy | DMCA Info | Advertising | Become an Official Vendor
Copyright © 2009 Shogun Interactive Development. Most rights reserved.
Page generated in 0.09982 seconds with 9 queries